Donald Trump has said that he will not become a dictator if he becomes US president again except “on day one”, after warnings from Democrats and some Republicans that the US was in danger of becoming an autocracy if he wins the 2024 election. Fuck, well at least he’s honest on this statement

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think the American people would ever let a Dictator get that far. If Trump gets nominated by the GOP you’ll see so much violence that by election day the entire course of history in the United States will be forever changed. I personally believe the GOP will not let him be nominated and will reject him. Trump will run third party and split the vote and give the Democrats a huge win.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wished I could be so optimistic. They have had endless chances to reject him and haven’t. It’s almost like Putin has some leverage on a bunch of em lol.

      He will get nominated, but hopefully my fellow Americans will not let him return to the white house.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wish that were true, but I suspect that the American people have become too passive to resist a dictator. He won’t take over by force, but cloaked in legitimacy, just like Hitler and Mussolini did. Heck, you don’t even have to go back that far. That’s Putin’s playbook, too. A Republican President also has a Supreme Court that favors very strong presidential powers and a permanently divided and largely impotent Congress. No real resistance there.

      So, what’s left? The police? American police would love having more power under a dictator. The public hates cops these days, and a dictator would restore their “rightful place” as respected and feared enforcers who will “clean up the streets”.

      The military? Well, that’s a wild card. They may not support a dictator, but they also don’t want to start a civil war. I think a US dictator will give himself enough legal cover and legitimacy to convince the military to hang back from interfering in politics.

      The most likely source of resistance is from individual states. However, I’m not sure what they can do, realistically. Secession would certainly start a civil war, which would play right into the dictator’s hands, giving him the perfect excuse to suspend rights and use the military for domestic purposes.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        The military? Well, that’s a wild card.

        Just want to mention Tommy Tuberville holding up military appointments. Unrelated I’m sure.

        Despite claiming he will stop blocking such appointments, he is still going to continue blocking the appointments of 3 and 4 star generals.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      They literally had the chance to stop him during his second impeachment after the attempted insurrection. Anyone who didn’t do it then, sure as hell isn’t going to do anything now.

      The last thing the GOP wants to do is piss off his supporters right before the next presidential election. The electoral college could have ousted him during the 2016 election (as people had floated around) too. There’s just not enough people are willing or have the desire to reject him. Many would love to have him as a dictator, they just need the right pieces in the SCOTUS to say it’s in the constitution.

      He’s 100% going to be the nominee now. Even if he goes to jail, he’s still going to be the nominee. The time for anything different is LONG past.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Why do you think there will be violence before the election, but after Trump’s nomination? In this scenario, in your mind, who are the ones that kick off this violence?

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Historical evidence on the rise of Dictators. You have to opress your opposition through violence to look strong. I foresee Kent State style responses from Trump loyalists in law enforcement.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Before the election? Why would they do it before the election? I don’t really understand what you’re saying.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yes, and Jan 6 happened after the election…

              They will be fine (as fine as these nutjobs can be) until the results are announced. If Trump loses, then they go crazy. If he wins, they’ll be very happy (but also go crazy because these people are insane).

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you prosecute violence against your opposition, publicly and with great force, you run a good chance of terrifying large portions of your opposition’s voting base into not voting for fear of implied violence.