Employment change is a life event

Open enrollment doesn’t apply if you have a change of life event

I’ve always felt he’s a little overhyped because of his pedigree

It’s a TV show. It’s on Apple TV+ or your favorite torrent site.

Honestly? It’s the kind of thing you should go into without reading much about. Part thriller, part workplace drama, part sci-fi. The premise is that people can “sever” themselves from their work, so that they don’t have to remember or think about work in their free time. Sort of like a memory block, but it causes you to basically have two separate memories/selves.

…. Vikings? Really?

Well you should watch it

No, this is the internet, go away with your facts and reality!!! I want to be mad at Disney!!!

I wouldn’t call that “virtually no time”

Sit for a few minutes first. Getting up/down will alter it for a few mins

Also, don’t buy a cheap monitor. I’ve used a cheap CVS one that gave different readings 10 times in a row.

Was your dog named after the dog in Severance?

Depends on how or why the original verdict was thrown out iirc, but usually yes. A new allegation is a new crime that you wouldn’t have been charged with before.

He’s been in prison for a few years?

Find me a company where this isnt in their terms

1. It’s down 9% since in revenue compared to this quarter last year. Not good but 71% loss on net income is slightly misleading
2. Outlook is often more important than earnings. People are, supposedly, hype about the autonomous taxis. But those have been coming “next year” for a couple years now

Except yes, he is defending them? What’s your point?

I was hoping more for studies that illustrate this, not just an article summarizing it all

It’s almost like if you need people to vote for your agenda, you can’t tell them “suck it, I’m gonna support an effort to oust you”

Unless you are a moron of a party leader, this will always be the case, particularly in a 2 party system.

Edit: also, the article doesn’t mention progressives. He’s defending all incumbents, so the conclusion that this is an attack on progressives is not really founded

Do you have more info on this?

No. Autism is not a reason to be a bigot. Maybe the “lashes out” could be explained by sensory sensitivity (depending on the scenario and what you mean by “lashing out”), but that doesn’t excuse bigotry.

Edit: also, what makes you say she is “mentally younger”? Autism and ADHD don’t stunt maturity in and of themselves

I can’t tell if this entire account is attempting to mock people with 0 self awareness or if you actually have no self awareness

Or, just trolling for downvotes?