That article is pretty different. It barely touches on the kneejerk reaction from the right, which is the point of OP’s article. It doesn’t get in depth with voters at all, tbh.
If you wanted an article discussing the facts of drug smuggling, yes, your article is short, sweet, and to the point. However, all of that content AND MORE is included in the original, since the point of the original is how people have shifted right on drug policy, despite there being no evidence for Trump’s statements.
I’m a little confused as to how the title makes Trump sound good. Facts are facts.
Instead of downvoting because you think the title makes the article pro-Trump, people should actually read the article
I don’t think anyone is saying he’s good. They’re just saying “holy shit, even this this insane guy who is so bad is anti-Trump”
100%. Take out those first 2 drives of the game (chalk it up to few of them playing in the preseason) and it was pretty solid for the offense
Blankenship picked of Rodgers (back when he was with the Packers) in his rookie season, in one of his first games iirc
There’s a really good Dick pun to be made as a follow-up joke here, I just can’t think of it
You know it’s bad when the person who makes everything into a joke admits that it’s fucked
Yeah, I noticed that. Not the call I would’ve made, but almost as soon as he signaled, it all became about the toe
What an insane ending. The league couldn’t have asked for a juicier start to the season
I read a lot of fucked up news stories, but this one is one of the wildest in recent memory
What most people don’t realize is that childhood vaccinations don’t actually last forever. It’s been probably 30 years since I completed most of my vaccinations as a toddler, but when I got my most recent job (at a healthcare provider), they tested me and I needed boosters for some childhood vaccines due to losing immunity.
If you have a HYS, there is no reason to have 100k in an account earning .05%.
Like others have said, everything else depends on your risk tolerance. If you’re young, you should have more in higher risk stuff (stocks, etc.). Even if you have a big loss, you can earn it back.
Whatever you don’t need liquid and whatever isn’t in high-risk investments can go into stuff like bonds and CDs
The article doesn’t specify, but it was probably dollar dog night… They had to stop it, partially because drunk kids would throw em
They’re in our blood and even in our brain?
There are a number of feminist communities on Lemmy that you’re welcome to join, although I doubt you’ll get very far with arguments that were addressed in the 1990s
Whoa. You guys get replies when you email DAs of the biggest cities in the USA?
So you read the pieces that challenge what I believe, but how about the sources that validate my opinion? Let’s ignore all the other evidence and focus on that
Well TIL what DINK means. As another DINK household (unless you count the dogs), I have literally never been judged or had a confrontation about this.
Sure, almost all of my friends have kids now, so the nature of our relationships have changed. But I don’t think it’s necessarily in a bad way.
Check out Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble. One of the best books I’ve read on the subject