- cross-posted to:
- furry_irl@pawb.social
- cross-posted to:
- furry_irl@pawb.social
cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/38448230
Source (Furaffinity)
Separate ssd’s lets go
While microsoft has admitted to bugs causing exactly this scenario. I personally have a stabe 6 months with dual-boot. And only updating cachos once a month or every two weeks has been fine. The server and rog ally exclusively runs linux.
Grub had/has this issue every time windows does a cumulative monthly update. Systemd doesn’t have this issue.
Don’t dual boot, flatten and rebuild.
“B-but my gaaaaaamez!!!”
Ah yes, the classic dual-boot woes
The supposed update that fixed it (windows update) broke it worse than ever, took me quite awhile to figure it out.
This should not happen unless you booted into windows and ran an update.
Well, but you could update windows, then reboot but boot into linux. That means the windows update can’t fully complete yet. Now if you start up your PC the next day and it boots into Windows by default, the update process will continue.
Same thing. You’d have to boot into windows at some point.
Ladies and gentleman we got em
It always sucks dual booting in my experience. It’s an exercise in balancing maintenance and disk space management between two operating systems. You’re always likely patching if you actively switch between them.
I think it’s usually better to choose one and virtualize the other. I’d rather choose Linux + Windows VM than the other way around.
Sadly VMs don’t work with the Anti-Cheat rootkits, one of the only reasons I still have Windows
Yea, I figured thats why most people end up dual booting. It’s not a judgment or anything.
FWIW, I get around this by either using Geforce Now to stream the game that uses it or simply not playing the game lol. It’s not worth dealing with Windows for me.
My friends and I don’t usually play the kind of games that use Anti-Cheat so its not an issue.
I haven’t had dual boot problems since the early 2010s. I don’t even know what I’m doing right.
Probably installing on separate drives.
Nope. Only have the one. I usually create a separate /boot partition and use UEFI, I think.
I have Linux and Windows on separate drives.
Me too, the windows drive is in the garage
*garBage
I that why I never relate to this issue? I’ve had a dual boot setup for years by now and have always been able to choose either windows or Linux at startup, but they are on separate drives
Yeah, Windows has a habit of borking bootloaders whenever it’s on a partitioned drive.
Gaming. Want a quick round in a pause? Mount error: go boot Windows to fix it. But i have multiple tools and sessions and stuff open…
And Windows still can’t handle anything reliable.
@MonkderVierte @bluesheep ntfs? just use chkufsd binary from paragon mounter apk (there is static x86 binary in assets). And do not use ntfs-3g, it is slow and almost abadonned.
Oh, right, i never used the new ntfs driver. So it’s only a bad memory.
@MonkderVierte new ntfs driver sometimes might be unstable (usually chkufsd helps fix some errors)
Also there is fuse Paragon UFSD version (you may use ufsd binaries from paragon mounter on x86)
But ntfs-3g utilities sometimes cannot fix even trivial journal errors
With super cheap SSD’s and motherboards with multiple m.2 slots, there’s rarely an excuse not to have different drives anymore. Laptops might be an exception.
Some gaming laptops come with a second nvme slot. Mine does and I did exactly this. Was wayyy simpler.
The trick is to have a second EFI partition. One for windows to destroy, and one for linux to enjoy.
Good old switcharoo
If you’re lucky, it’s still on the disk and you just need to “repair” the bootloader.
If not, well, that traumatised Mr Incredible pastiche might be at least a circle of hell too pleasant.
You have backups, right?
There’s no way Windows would just access non-readable partition, and do anything with it, let alone delete it. No operating system does this.
Replacing the bootloader is of course much more likely, but the general rule is that if you can manage to install Linux, you probably can follow basic instructions to fix GRUB or whatever your bootloader is.
There’s no way Windows would just access non-readable partition
I knew that was true back in the day, but I haven’t tried dual booting in a long, long time. Also, I wouldn’t put it past Microsoft’s current incarnation to “accidentally” decide that that “empty” partition would be great for virtual memory and the hibernation image.
Oh Windows knows this is the EFI partition, there is a flag for that. Windows just doesn’t care when it decides to nuke your bootloader with its own…
And yes, it’s still happening…
Installing Linux is so simple nowadays that fixing the bootloader is a level higher now
To be fair, windows does save its license key on ROM. It writes to the read-only memory. So it could.
Can that actually happen like this? If Windows killed the bootloader wouldn’t that mean that you couldn’t boot into Kubuntu either? Or can it somehow kill the bootloader when the PC is turned off?
ish. if your boot priority is set to windows first and it decides it needs to repair the bootloader it can wipe other oses from the boot order.
What definitely did happen to me is I booted into windows, shut down, on the next startup there was no more grub menu, just instant boot into windows. (Separate physical drives).
I constantly tell people the dangers of dual booting. They don’t listen and then it breaks.
I constantly tell people the remedy of the dangers of dual booting, using a separate drive for Linux. They sometimes listen and then have a dual boot system that doesn’t break.
Eh, Windows has broken grub before even if it’s on a separate drive, some Windows update did that last year.