• Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    204
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is a lot about this that is nuts, but one thing that really jumps out at me.

    It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

    But with this I have to ask: are Biden and Harris assisting with a plan that is clearly intended to cost Harris the election?

    I want to say that they surely must’ve told Israel not to launch anything before election day. But based in their actions so far, it doesn’t seem like they’re imposing a “no election interference against us personally” requirement as a condition of their assistance.

    I guess we’ll see.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      149
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their messaging so far to Israel has been “do whatever the fuck you want, 💰💰”

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a weird thing to say, but I actually don’t think that there’s any indication that Harris or Trump would do anything substantially different with regard to Israel, but the biggest change is that if Trump wins, I suspect that coverage of this will disappear behind all the coverage of his domestic chaos. At least if Harris is president I think there is a chance we see the press maintain a modicrum of interest in covering this.

        Either way, words can’t describe my anger that Harris appears to be prepared to throw the election over her support for genocide. It is an unreal situation to watch.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            2 months ago

            So the one says it out loud, the other just keeps the intention quiet.

            Both are equally sending weapons.

            However with Trump we saw that he pulled American soldiers out of the region and he is much more unstable. So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              2 months ago

              So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

              That would require him to give a shit about the soldiers dying to make a change. His history says the exact opposite of that. Soldiers dying would do absolutely nothing towards whether he changes anything.

              • Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                2 months ago

                Trump pulled most troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure he doesnt care about the soldiers life, but he isnt committed to being a war hawk. He just does random stuff.

                • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  29
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning. He just decided to speed it up dramatically so he could say he achieved something, and promised a deadline that was unattainable while doing it well. It’s not random, it’s narcissism at the expense of everything else, including the country.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 months ago

            No intelligent person should vote for a party supporting a genocide either. Israel government is finishing the job already.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ok. But either Harris or Trump WILL be our next president with how fucked up our election system is.

              Who would you rather fight on this? A run of the mill democrat, or a literal nazi? We’re choosing our opponent, it’s the only choice we get.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                Don’t support any of them and use your energies somewhere else, you said yourself that the system is fucked up

                • PunnyName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay black pill bro. When you grow up and understand how things actually work, let us know.

                  Maybe those of us who are actively trying (while also understanding how our choices work) will acquire Ranked Choice voting before you become mature enough to join in on this non-black-or-white conversation.

                • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Sure. And then trump wins and i completely lose my reproductive rights and my trans wife loses her healthcare.

                  There’s more at stake here.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’ll disappear by him shutting down all news organizations and outlawing any dissenting opinions. He’s straight up said it. There is no functional difference on this issues between them. It’s the ancillary consequences trump will impose on everyone that is why he should be fired into the sun as an example.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology. It was concocted by atheist colonizers, not religious leaders. The goals are colonial, not religious. Most importantly zios commit these crimes while claiming to be the only true jews. This is extremely anti-semitic.

            So it’s no surprise that they’ve collaborated with literal nazis before WW2. And it’s no surprise that they continue to collaborate with racists and fascists all over the planet. In the usa the vast majority of zionists are christians that are generally very anti-semitic. They want jews to take over palestine so doomsday will come and kill the jews! These are the allies of zionism smh.

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology.

              A significant number of jews across the globe say otherwise. The very foundation of your argument is self serving propoganda. And I didnt read past that.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump in charge tends to highlight problems not burry them. Like how immigration and the border camps were a huge story, then Biden got elected, kept all the same staff and same facilities and suddenly the border camps weren’t a problem and we went further rightward on immigration. People stop paying attention when Democrats win, that’s how they burry stories, and that’s why the media loves Trump, because hes the one who generates the clicks and engagement they track.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trump would tell Netanyahu to nuke the place and he’d fucking do it. It would be a catastrophe the likes of which we haven’t seen since WWII.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        She most likely was in the room when Biden authorized the troops you know. She is very much on the same page as Biden on this.

        Sucks you guys don’t have any other option.

          • riodoro1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            She did say she supports Bidens stance on Israel and that israel has the right to murder innocent children protect itself.

            • thejml@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              To be fair I think most people think it (and other countries) should be able to defend itself… it’s just that they went from defense to all out genocide like a year ago.

              The current party doesn’t know where that line is while the other party wants them to “finish the job”.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Of the two she’s the one whose had statements about Israel needing to respect international law. So there’s no evidence she believes Israel should be allowed to conduct a genocide.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Didn’t she just say the other week there’s nothing she wouldn’t do differently from Biden?

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Which to this point has been attempts at a cease fire and offshore missile defense help. Putting troops under Iranian missiles is a massive departure from the past year.

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, up to this point it has been billions of dollars and weapons to Israel with the occasional finger wag to them. Troops on the ground is the natural next step of his policy up to now, and congruent with Kamala’s statements that “Iran is the number one enemy”.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have. She generally tries to walk a line between fully pro Israel and neutrality.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The insanity is not that it is Republicans or Democrats

      The insane part is that America is just sleep walking straight into a war that will probably escalate into something much bigger and no one wants to do anything about it.

      God help us all

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      if they money you get from AIPAC is more than the money you get as US presidency and without the headache of being president, I wounder if Kamala care enough to be a president.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

      Do you realize that israel government is waging war only because they are backed by USA?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure what your point is.

        I understand that this is in a real sense the US’s war, and that Biden is not being dragged into it, he’s fully committed to it. I’m not sure what that changes about my observation that it’s weird that Harris appears to be facilitating an electoral hit job on herself.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, and zios will be even more backed by Trump (supposedly).

        It’s not even a hidden thing. Yahoo wants Trump. Grift recognize grift.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If Harris is in on a plan to strike Iran it wouldn’t cost her the election in the US. All they have to do is say, “We received credible intelligence that Iran had decided to sprint for a nuclear warhead. We had to act in a timely manner.”

      What would cost her the election is if an American soldier dies to an Iranian missile and Biden/Harris doesn’t immediately go hard on Iran. Which makes this a ridiculously irresponsible move by Biden.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It feels like they are totally beholden to Israel.

      If they push back hard, they alienate swing voters who like Israel from the old days, aka apocalypse.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is actually a persistent myth: there is no evidence that they are beholden to a constituency that would punish them for any actions that curtail Israel.

        Israel’s actions are wildly unpopular across the electorate. They are unpopular with nearly all Democrats as well as most independents and a very large plurally of Republicans. I have seen numerous polls that show that there is a very significant number of voters that Harris is losing over this, and I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate that there is any measurable cost to her speaking out against Israel at all. Which is really sad. Because it means that this is absolutely a moral choice on her part. This is not an electoral choice at all.

        https://truthout.org/articles/poll-endorsing-israel-arms-embargo-would-boost-harriss-support-to-49-percent/

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I am not religious so I don’t know the details but I have a friend who is very religious and refuses to vote for Trump again. He hates Harris but won’t give me a reason. When I have brought up the Israel stuff he immediately jumps to a very, holy land, must support and defend at any cost mentality. He would never vote Democrat but it makes me wonder how pervasive this weird fairy tale attachment exists throughout the voting base.

          • Andy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s a good question. Is your friend an evangelical Christian? A lot of people don’t know this, but the actual biggest plurality of political Zionists in the US are not Jews, but Evangelical Christians who support Israel because they believe it is a chess piece in bringing about the end of the world (which is a good thing in their dogma).

            They also happen to often like the idea of ethnofascism, which is a very sad state of affairs.

            • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              He is evangelical Christian yes. I don’t have much exposure to religion. I have gone to his church a couple times when he has asked me to in the decade or so we’ve been friends. I’m in my forties. I’ve never felt pressured but I also keep my religion or lack of to myself. I just never really understood the position on Israel and it really stuck out to me. Even though he will freely admit how crazy and hateful things are out of the MAGA crowd, I get the feeling anytime the topic gets close to coming up with me he fends it off by essentially communicating to me that he has unwavering and unquestioned support of Israel and I haven’t been willing to push it since he is otherwise a great person in my life that has helped me through a number of difficulties.

              • Andy@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s a shame. For what it’s worth, his position isn’t a mystery to me. I believe that he’s been convinced by his church that unquestioningly supporting Israel’s expansionary goals, regardless of any other moral question is an absolute necessity for anyone who truly loves Jesus and believes strongly in his rebirth and in the promise of everlasting life in heaven.

                It is – with all due respect – as crazy as anything you’d hear in a Texas cult bunker. But I’m guessing that it’s real as a wildfire to your friend. It makes me sad to think about.

                • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I appreciate the insight and time you have taken to respond. Also your understanding. I have a really difficult time processing the situation. It does feel very cult like and matter of fact. I don’t understand how someone that seems so good can know something so bad is going on, who is so obviously able to recognize the bad in other related areas, and blindly vehemently support them unquestionably. He’s intelligent and successful…yet so lost, the most caring and compassionate person I know; it can’t be ok.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A majority of Americans are against the action in Gaza. It is a popular opinion not to support it, unless you’re a major donor.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          So in the last few weeks, Biden can pull support as much as possible basically giving Bibi the finger. Any funding that dries up is unlikely to have more of an effect than pulling support. This helps Harris win. Then she can re-woo them over the next 4 years.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          A majority of those who actually turn out to vote are pro Israel (and no, people under 35 don’t vote in other countries where they have more options, so cut the “they don’t vote because of the support for Israel” bullshit, they don’t vote because they’re young and don’t care)

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay, well the Harris campaign can continue claiming that the reason she’s down in the polls in Michigan has nothing to do with Gaza.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is one of those times we should remind ourselves that if we as Redditors can plainly see something so out in the open and obvious, then almost certainly the executive branch can see it too. The odds of them knowing something we don’t know are overwhelmingly greater than the reverse.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I see this often, and it’s frequently, consistently not the case.

        I understand the sense in this belief, but if you review history over just the last five years you can consistently see this not being true over and over. Going all the way back to the Iraq War: it was obvious at the time that the Bush administration was lying about their claimed evidence that there was an active program creating weapons of mass destruction. And at the time, there was a deafening movement of regular voters who loudly protested that we were absolutely convinced that it was complete and obvious bullshit.

        And people like JOE BIDEN loudly expressed exactly what you’re saying: they know things we don’t know. They know what they’re doing.

        And they didn’t! They did not have any meaningful information we didn’t have!

        Sadly, it’s debatable whether they knew what they were doing. Did they expect it would be such a historic clusterfuck? That it would create decades of worsening outcomes for us? Probably not. But did they know they were making up a fake case for war because they wanted to let off some anger over 9/11 by killing hundreds and hundreds of THOUSANDS uninvolved Muslims, and build some new military bases near oil in the process? Yes. Obviously yes.

        And after the fact, the people who claimed that they knew things that we didn’t became president and Secretary of State.

        They do not know something we don’t know. They are doing exactly what this looks like. Biden would absolutely go to war with Iran just to serve the cause of Zionism even though he knows that Benjamin Netanyahu is a fascist. That is exactly what this is. There’s not chess logic behind this, you can absolutely know everything you need to if you read newspapers regularly.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The WMD were always a false pretext.

          And anyway, you can’t cherry pick any one episode or even several from history where the heads of state were wrong or stupid and say that they don’t know more than we do. They literally have everything we have in the public media and enormous intelligence operations working for them. This doesn’t make them honest or infallible, but anyone who sits in their armchair tut tutting about how “gee I hope this president can see it’s an obvious trap” is, in a word, a fool.

          • Andy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I think you’re arguing a strawman version of my point. I’m not claiming that it’s impossible for them to know something we don’t. I’m just saying that the assumption that there is secret information that makes his actions sensible is not well founded.

            There are numerous examples of leaders claiming expertise that wasn’t borne out. And if this were the case, I think it would be reasonable to expect them to at least claim this to be the case.

            As it stands, this behavior can be fully explained with the information available to us and Biden’s foreign policy stance. So there is no reason when you see him doing something that can be easily explained by the observation that he has poor judgement and priorities that are wildly different than most Americans to believe that there is a reason outside of the public facts and our existing knowledge of his poor judgement and unpopular priorities.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              If you want to narrow your point that’s fine but I never said that there must be some reason their actions make sense. I said they can be wrong or duplicitous but they necessarily have more access to information than we do and that’s a plain fact you can’t talk your way past with all the hindsight in the world.

  • pound_heap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh come on, the header is a clickbait. There is a US military base in Israel already, it’s been there for years. The article is about an announcement that they are sending another missile defense battery with personnel alongside

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There are 100 more US soldiers deployed, aren’t there? I’m not a US citizen, but I still wonder why more troops are needed to help Israel in an war of aggression that violates international law.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes it’s an anti-missle battery and a crew of 100 to operate it. Presumably this includes 7-day around the clock shift coverage so it sounds like a reasonable number for a large missle array.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lol,maybe because Hezbollah rockets are getting launched and we’d like to shoot them down before US personnel are killed potentially escalating this even further?

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe we should get the US personnel out instead of sending more, then.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re both right. We want to protect our servicemen there from Hezzbollah rockets and they shouldn’t be there in the first place.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          we’d like to shoot them down before US personnel are killed potentially escalating this even further?

          So we’re sending more personal instead of getting them out of the situation? Gymnastics.

        • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Let the rockets rain down and stop this madness before the fascist state of Israel kills us all.

          Do Americans really believe they’ll be able to get their pet monster under control once they genocide the entire Middle East?

          “Greater Israel” is just going to keep expanding unless they’re stopped now. Do you think Nazi Germany would just say “ok we have enough land for the master race / chosen people let’s stop now”.

          Do you really think America will have any power once it gets to that point?

          The world let Zionists get away with the Nakba at the time because of the Holocaust, but now the Zionists and the United States are the ones doing a Holocaust.

          Israel is a failure of humanity and an affront to Jewish people everywhere, hijacking the religion in order to build a white supremacist, genocidal, settler-colonial apartheid ethnostate with a Star of David slapped on it.

          Israel must now be dismantled, land back to the Palestinians, the architects of this Holocaust brought to justice, and the people deprogrammed out of their genocidal cult.

          • Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Do Americans really believe they’ll be able to get their pet monster under control once they genocide the entire Middle East?

            I don’t think any Americans who truly support this think further than the next quarter of Raytheon profits.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Gtfo. If you need to play wargames maybe send some more support to Ukraine instead.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ve got an idea to prevent this from escelating further: Depose Netan-fucking-Yahu.

          The UN and the US Citizens would praise it if anything. China and Russia would say shit about it but they also say shit about us doing nothing. We can literally only gain from destroying the Israel current administration.

          • DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Absolutely. However, there is no need to destroy anyone. It would be enough for the US to give up its unconditional support for the Netanyahu regime. Then Netanyahu would be voted out and would go to prison for corruption in his own country.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Ok but that does nothing to stop genocide, land theft, terrorism, invasions, etc.

              It’s a joke to pretend like yahoo is the root problem.

              • DandomRude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’m just trying to suggest a somewhat reasonable solution. I don’t think Israel could afford to keep this inhumane war going if they didn’t have the support of the US. Let us also not forget that it was radical right-wing Zionists who assassinated Yitzchak Rabin, the Israeli politician who first credibly promised peace in the region. What I want to say is this: Violence and hatred cannot be a solution - this only leads to more violence and more hatred, more misery and more suffering.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Who is “we”?

          Maybe I’d have some sympathy for you if y’all stop with the genocide, terrorism, ethnic cleansing, land theft, invasions, etc.

      • pound_heap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I see someone already told you that American soldiers have been there already, long ago this new deployment. But they didn’t bother to prove it to you, and you didn’t believe them.

        Well, let me Google it for you. Very quick search reveals this article from 2017:

        https://apnews.com/general-news-2ccf317f293d4be59b92cec5554c3db4

        Back then it was “dozens of soldiers”, nothing close to thousands another person claimed, though. But I think it’s safe to assume the numbers grew since then.

        • Andy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not disputing this, I’m just asking for clarity so I can understand key facts. Are there soldiers actively serving in Israel? How many? Since when?

          That article didn’t actually provide much clarity. I tried searching for more, and found a bit in this article:

          https://theintercept.com/2023/10/27/secret-military-base-israel-gaza-site-512/

          The main thing this says is that US military presence in Israel is deliberately ambiguous. For instance, the day after the commemoration in the article you shared, US European Command actually denied that this was a us military base, insisting that it was actually a “living facility”.

          I don’t doubt that we have troops there. But historically the army doesn’t seem to acknowledge them. So announcing sending people does seem significant.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s only a huge deal if we talk about doing the same for actual allies like Ukraine instead of Netanyahu’s rogue regime

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I feel so bad for the people being deployed and their families. These people are being positioned to be triggers for a war against Iran. They believe it will be easier to manufacture consent for that war if the administration (whichever one we have) can point to dead Americans. Sick shit.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate how I can’t even comfort myself by knowing this idiocy will cost them the election because these fucks are the less horrible option.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yep, this is coming from the most ‘leftist’ candidates we are allowed to vote for. Pretty fucked up options we get to choose from. I hate it here.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can always vote more left, and should vote more left if you live in a dem stronghold like California.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    US President Joe Biden has said he is “absolutely, positively” urging Israel to stop firing at UN peacekeepers during its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon, following two incidents in 48 hours. Source

    Some hours later: Biden absolutely, positively sends troops to help Israel out. WTF…

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wtf is going on in this comments section? They are sending an anti air battery to protect them against rocket fire, but the bulk of the comments are acting like they are sending in troops to go in on the ground into Gaza/Lebanon.

      Does really noone even bother to read the article?

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am not a US citizen. My point is not that US troops are being deployed, but that this is a war of aggression that contradicts international law. The US should not support this - not in any way.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree that they shouldn’t be supporting it. But we’re talking about defending a country against missile attacks, not violating some potential ceasefire by launching missiles for Israel.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            They’re enabling Israel’s aggression by providing military support, even defensive support. Not to mention adding US troops to the area increases chances some will get killed or injured, providing an excuse to enter the conflict even more.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              I was responding to someone who claimed that by sending tools to stop weapons from killing people, Biden is violating his call for a ceasefire.

              You can disagree with this, but claiming it’s aggressive is just blatantly false.

          • DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The thing is that Israel was never attacked in a military sense. It was a terrible terrorist attack, that much is true. Israel retaliated - not only against those responsible, but above all against the Palestinian civilian population. The number of victims is simply disproportionate: the attack on October 7, 2023 claimed 1,200 lives; Israel has now killed more than 40,000 Palestinians (this is a conservative estimate). There is no longer any danger for Israel - and in terms of its military superiority, there hasn’t been any for the last 20 years. Lebanon is only marginally involved in all this. Hezbollah is not Hamas. I don’t want to go too far with all the his. It’s simple: what Israel is doing is wrong on any moral scale. Anyone who doesn’t see that is grossly misinformed.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Noone is defending Israel’s invasion here. Your top level comment implied that Biden is violating his own call to a ceasefire by sending these troops in …when they are a defensive unit. No missile attacks, no need to use the defensive battery.

              • DandomRude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                What do you want me to say? With a view to the US election campaign, I’m glad to say: Vote for Harris/Walz! The apparent alternative Trump/Vance would be much worse even in this matter. I have no problem to say that because it’s true. That does not mean that you are fighting a just cause here - on the contrary. It just means that your political system is in shambles and that your moral compass if way off.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  What do you want me to say?

                  What I would love is for people to read the article and then objectively think about it for a second, rather than just knee-jerk respond to the headline in a way that confirms what they already believe to be true, seemingly regardless of what is actually happening.

                  All I did was correct the misinformation you were spreading. There are plenty of valid reason to criticize the Biden admin over, no need to make ones up.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Zios are in danger as long as the rightful inheritors of the stolen land are alive.

              That’s the whole point of their genocide.

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This emboldens the bully Israel. Now they know that no matter who they pick on, they will never feel any real counter-attacks because the US will stop them all. This encourages them to continue their attacks and to pick new fights because there will never be any consequences. If Biden wants to encourage Netanyahu to stop his wars of aggression, he needs to make Israel second guess their attacks.

        This move absolutely counters his message for a ceasefire. This will embolden them to keep fighting.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy is too obsessed with elections and swallowed the bait. Seeing everyone’s reaction I did.

        Luckily I’ve looked a bit further down the thread to find something not about elections, and saw this comment.

        The title is hella misleading and clickbait. We should restrict people from posting such BS.

  • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Clickbait bullshit. The Department of Defense statement clarifies the US “troops” are just the crew required to operate the air defense battery equipment the US has been supplying to Israel for a while now.

    This is not the first time the United States has deployed a THAAD battery to the region. The President directed the military to deploy a THAAD battery to the Middle East last year following the October 7th attacks to defend American troops and interests in the region.

    Again, nothing new or different about this. The US is not putting boots on the ground to shoot people up. At least not yet.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, you’re very mistaken. Let me explain.

      In the past, the US has stationed supporting troops off of Israel, in battleships far away. It’s meant to provide support while keeping things calm.

      The reason that putting any soldiers IN Israel is significant is that it means that if Iran tries to kill any Israeli soldiers, they can’t do it without risking killing Americans. And if they kill an American, it is understood that we will retaliate and they will be at war with the United States of America.

      That’s the point of sending 100 troops to offer “tech support”. It’s to deliberately create conditions that could start a war. If you ask a general, they’ll claim that it’s just shrewd tactics, because letting Iran know all this means that good judgment will prevent them from attacking Israel. But every war in history is preceded by people making those claims (even when they don’t believe them) before going to war.

      This is foreplay. This is how you flirt when you’re a NatSec pervert thinking of going to war against someone.

    • psycocan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And don’t you think that 100 troops deployed in Israel means that the US is actively defending Israel? We’re already past the point of the US enabling Israel aggressions and rabid rogue actions and the large scale genocide. The US will fight the wars started by Israel

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah we don’t share our real defense tech with allies, even Israel. THAAD is legit platform we field and this would not let any IDF forces near.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Biden is really trying to start a whole new war and make the Democrats lose this election.

    • ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, I think Biden supports this unwaveringly because it aligns with US policy to keep the region destabilized.

      I mean they helped overthrow the Shah, aided the Taliban in fighting the soviets, invaded Iraq and Kuwait (which led directly to the creation of jihadist state – ISIS), aided a US-aligned faction in the Syrian civil war, helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions… there is so much more.

      And for what? To keep them from realizing they are all arabs and are sitting on the largest collective reserves of oil in the world…

      Evil Empire.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions…

        Holy shit tell me more. I’m an Arab and this is my first time hearing of this.

        • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I found a paper on this here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/arabstudquar.35.3.0255

          Seems like they were actually on the side of the dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen until they realized that they’d collapse. I think Libya is very well remembered, they just completely ruined what was formerly a stable, wealthy country (although a dictatorship of course).

          Also especially in Egypt when the elections didn’t turn out the way they wanted it because the Muslim Brotherhood candidate won, they backed the regime change and since then Egypt has a new dictator loyal to the US and Israel.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The MIC has more control over US foreign policy than the US political class (including the president) because America is a shadow plutocracy — controlled by the near-circular venn-diagram of its wealthiest individuals and corporations — masquerading as a “democracy”. Americans are able to vote in free elections, but 90% of the politicians on state and federal ballots are pre-approved, pre-positioned, and directly financed by the plutocracy. Most of the laws passed by congress are directly written by corporate legal teams, packed with unrelated provisions to allocate public money to corporations; they don’t even read or understand exactly what they’re voting on most of the time… This is ultimately the case in every “democracy”, just with varying degrees of gratuity and success.

            The proof is honestly in most of the US’s present and past actions, both domestically and internationally (including the undying support for Israel). They’ve been allied with, and militarily supported, countless dictators all around the world for centuries, because dictatorships are more profitable for American plutocrats than democracy. Democracy poses a direct threat to corporate power and profits, and is literally why they overthrew the Shah in Iran. I genuinely believe that MAGA is more a power play by the plutocracy to formally end American democracy once and for all (with thunderous applause) and solidify the corporate dictatorship through a fascist theocracy… Otherwise they will continue to face the threat of left leaning movements like Bernie Sanders actually coming to fruition.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      He is petty enough to do that. We’ll and doesn’t seem to give a shit about what terrible things Israel does

      • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Biden has always been a narcissist. And many 80 year olds do get pretty petty and selfish, from what I’ve seen. We really need an age cap on government service so we dont have to go through this again. On supreme court justices and congressman too. Dying on the bench or in office of old age is wildly unacceptable for such important roles. GTFO.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Either he’s making too much money from AIPAC to stop now. Or he’s bitter about being pushed out of the race for president this election. Or both.

    • Anas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’ve already been participating: The failed aid pier had one use, and it was a military one.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Now we’ve got to fucking participate in it?

      Ah yes, killing all those innocent civilians hidden in incoming Iranian ballistic missiles…

      • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right. We will be defending Israel from the incoming Iranian ballistic missiles after they kill innocent civilians on a scale larger than they already have been, prompting a response from Iran large enough that the iron dome is not capable of handing it. Which totally doesn’t make us participants. We’re not directly doing the bloodshed, just enabling it and defending Israel from feeling any consequences.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    So hold on, no troops in Ukraine, because they’re not NATO, but troops in Israel no problem?

    Or is it because US is scared shitless of Putin? Or is it because a lot of prople sympathise eith Putin?

    Maybe there’s no profit in aiding Ukraine?

    • Talisker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      We want Israel to win and we want Ukraine to be an expensive quagmire for Russia.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I want Ukraine to win, for Lebanon to be an expensive quagmire for Israel, and for Russia to burn on principle.

        • Talisker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Extending Russia, Rand Corporation 2019

          The United States could also become more vocal in its support for NATO membership for Ukraine… While NATO’s requirement for unanimity makes it unlikely that Ukraine could gain membership in the foreseeable future, Washington’s pushing this possibility could boost Ukrainian resolve while leading Russia to redouble its efforts to forestall such a development.

          Expanding U.S. assistance to Ukraine, including lethal military assistance, would likely increase the costs to Russia, in both blood and treasure, of holding the Donbass region. More Russian aid to the separatists and an additional Russian troop presence would likely be required, leading to larger expenditures, equipment losses, and Russian casualties. The latter could become quite controversial at home, as it did when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

          https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      We have a top secret base there, just like Korea and Vietnam early troops usually come in and break shit you can’t let go.

      No it’s because Russia is preoccupied and we’re testing near peer weapons from 3+decades ago there with little to no risk to mainland usa. It’s morally wrong sure but it does at least make sense.

      I mean sorta but not really, we’re selling most stuff at a loss. The benefit is really seeing how well our stuff works against the enemy or was designed to fight. Don’t get me wrong people are getting rich but that’s from buying more weapons to replace the ones we sold.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If Putin didn’t have the nuclear card in his pocket US boots would have been on the ground in Ukraine 2 years ago.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Afaik they, as a principle, do not have nukes but retain the capability to manufacture them. Probably a good one since having nukes makes them a target of America and not having nukes also makes them a target of America and others. Every soverign state looks at what president nobel peace prize did to Libya as a reminder of what happens to states that denuclearize.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Iran is not threatening the USA in any meaningful way.

          On the other hand, USA is constantly invading the middle east, promoting genocide and terrorism, and literally trying to nuke Iran.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree. What does that have to do with Iran having nukes? I don’t consider having a deterrent to be an aggressive act on its own and its weird that that’s how you took it

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Biden is trying really hard to lose the election for the democrats.

    What blackmail does Netanyahu have on the guy? This is such a bad move.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s either court centrist Zionists or let Trump win. There’s no alternative.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a numbers game. There are WAY more Jewish people in the US than there are Arabs (~7.5 vs 3.5 million, according to a quick Google search).

      Strategically, those Jewish voters are also more likely to switch to a Republican vote than the Arabs, regardless. It would take 2 Arabs (or any other Democratic voter) sitting out to counter a single Democratic voter switching to a Republican vote.

      Granted, none of this accounts for voter locations (because only the 7 swing states matter), voter enthusiasm, claims of national security, or (most importantly of all) ethics.

      • Roldyclark
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except a lot of Jewish voters are anti Netanyahu and want a ceasefire too

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree. That was an additional detail that I did not cover, as I wanted to keep it relatively simple. I expect that the anti-Netanyahu Jewish voters are unlikely to switch to voting Trump, given that the latter is firmly and openly pro-genocide.

          • Roldyclark
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s a good point, but I don’t think it’s about Jewish voters at all. It’s about AIPAC.

            • 31337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              And most major U.S. media outlets are highly biased toward Israel for some reason. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen the U.S. media this biased on an issue; I have to resort to small outlets like The Intercept or foreign media like Al Jazeera (which are biased in their own way), to stay informed. The only things comparable I can think of is the Iraq-WMD thing, and their perpetual bias against labor rights/for capital.

        • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          AIPAC disagrees with you.

          Wait until after the election to see who really stands where.

              • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                And if the government were so inclined, they could declare AIPAC a foreign lobby group and stop them the same way they did RT.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              It is importance but it’s unclear why you are mentioning it here.

              • Fosheze@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Because they were responding to this comment by saying “AIPAC disagrees with you” implying that Jewish Voters = AIPAC.

                Except a lot of Jewish voters are anti Netanyahu and want a ceasefire too

                • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Not saying all Jewish voters = AIPAC. Some would, but not all.

                  I’m sating AIPAC has an oversized influence in US politics.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not at the expense of democracy, at least I hope. There is no other option this year.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            And this will be repeated every election year from here on out now that the DNC knows they can get away with it.

            • kobra@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              There are other avenues that can be taken in a democracy between now and the next election. Ranked choice voting would be great.

              How would a trump win help the genocide happening in Gaza??

              • Fosheze@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                How would a trump win help the genocide happening in Gaza??

                Is this the only thing any of you can say?

                No remotely sane person is saying trump would be better. That doesn’t mean the DNC isn’t fucking us over a barrel. Sitting around parroting “Hur dur but trump worse” is just enabling them. After trump there will be someone else and the DNC will just keep following the overton window to the right because they just need to keep pointing out that the other guy is worse. Plus all their online enablers will just shut down any discussion by repeating “well you must love trump if you don’t like the DNC stepping on your balls. Yum yum tasty boot.”

                Newsflash they will never give us RCV. RCV would take this new powerful tool of “but other guy worse” away from them and they are never going to sacrifice that power.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Everything can be justified in this way.

        “Adolf Hitler identified he needed to blame all problems on Jews. And systematically put them in concentration camps. This was a political move necessary to advance his career and appeal to voters.”

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          To be clear, at no point was I trying to justify any actions. My only goal was to explain the strategic path that would lead to it. And of course there are additional nuances, which I alluded to at the end.

          Besides, a winning strategy is not an indicator of ethics.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No one is supporting Israel because they are calculating Jewish population for votes, that’s ridiculous.

            They support Israel because of aipac campaign donations. The only calculation is how much money is in their pocket. Nothing else matters, including the ongoing genocide.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        People are downvoting you because they don’t like the outcome, not because they disagree with your argument.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh shit. Either he’s trolling Harris’s campaign or they really are a cult. Very popular decision joe, sure people will forget till november.

    • logos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I got to believe Bibi has him by the balls somehow. It’s the only thing that makes sense.

      Can we article 25 this fool? Harris might have a better chance if she’s already been president for a bit anyway.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s quite obvious the Israelis have many US politicians either in their payroll, or have dirt on them. That-s pretty much standard operating procedure for the Israeli intelligence services. They are masters at those things. All you have to see is their depth of infiltration in Muslim countries.

        I hate that, but I must admit they are impressive.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Or, old fucks who were born around the time of the holocaust still think of all Jewish people as victims of the holocaust and can’t wrap their head around the fact that some Jewish people can be just as horrible as anyone else.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        But Harris will most likely just send more troops. She did confirm she „supports” israel.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You think it’s just Biden that has hands in this? Israel would never have been so bold if the USA didn’t move it’s embassy to Jerusalem and that choice was not Bidens.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Governments and rulers had every peasant below them by the balls for centuries. What are you going to do about troops being deployed to aid israel?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      cult

      I have only heard this used in referring to Republicans. How did you come up with that description, especially in this context?