AI itself isn’t a bubble & isn’t going away. Not saying it won’t change but I’d prefer to be a realist than someone who believes in things just cause I want them to be true.

We all knew it was never about the hostages. It has always been about the land.

Apparently Newsom doesn’t even know who AIPAC is & Cory Crooker says his $800k AIPAC donations don’t matter.

Yes… Democracy Now for example, but they’d probably be considered even more left for reporting the truth.

I wish all I needed to tell me what to trust is a simple graph. According to that, I should be relying a lot more on CNN & NYT. If a majority of Americans don’t know at this point that MSM media outlets & politicians on both sides are highly influenced by the Israeli lobby, then they might as well start sending their taxpayer dollars to Israel themself.

I never read that Israel represents all Jews, nor how opposing genocide is antisemitic. I’d strongly argue that a country committing genocide while claiming to represent all Jews are actually engaging in antisemitism, especially since those they are genociding are semitic people.

You’re leaving out the most pertinent details, their bruh:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba

If you’re going to steal land & displace a million people, don’t be surprised when they revolt. The whole world sees Israel as the colonizing imperialists they’ve always been, and the colonizing monarchy that claimed back then Zionists could steal the land have ragrets.

First, if you actually believe Trump has violated the constitution then this is how you do it, in court. Trump does not have the ability to impeach judges, and it requires 2/3 majority of Congress.

While the Supreme Court may overrule decisions in some instances, they’ve shown at least some indication that they have a redline that he’s too stupid to realize. All I have to say at that point, is good luck attacking your own appointed Supreme Court Justices. See how that plays out for ya.

Legal judgements & opinions—even the ones that are based on flawed theories—are not a simple waive of the pen. I imagine even with significant corruption, that a process of keeping it almost entirely secret while trying to warp law into something else entirely is such a significant undertaking, that it isn’t sustainable.

The second & most important part however, what Trump is asking is that they instead not even try that, but instead ignore even basic judicial standards. While that might fly in some red states where he’s got a majority of support, once any faith is lost in the Supreme Court by District & Circuit courts, then you’ll see how a breakdown in the judiciary would take down Trump. Congress would not have the votes to impeach. There is no disciplinary action if the District & Circuit courts decide to no longer rely on Supreme Court precedent.

The Supreme Court only hears about 100 to 150 cases out of the more than 7,000 requests it receives each year. It is not structured to hear every single case of defiance from lower courts. If they altogether stopped relying entirely on Supreme Court precedent, the Supreme Court simply has no authority other than reversal. Furthermore, this would create such a breakdown that Republicans would immediately be pressured into impeachment of the President, knowing that they wouldn’t have the votes to amend the Constitution or impeach the judges.

LOL… this is a new argument I’ve been noticing more & more. It goes something like this… “Hamas made Israel commit a genocide.” If I was paying $7,000 per comment on social media, I’d be asking for a refund for such low effort Israeli propaganda.

Why is it a problem for you to condemn political violence? Either you oppose it or you don’t, end of story. If someone asked you condemn sexual assault, would you do it or claim the prob with condemning it is people still voted for Trump?

If you look at what the actual honoring is calling for, there is a lot of non-partisan good things there that ultimately aim for a goal that is opposed to political violence on both sides.

Good, this is what America should be about. It doesn’t mean all people the right will act in kind, nor people on the left, but the resolution was about condemning violence & extremism on both sides, and not using it as a tool to censor others:

Whereas the assassination of Charlie Kirk was not only a heinous act of violence, but a sobering reminder of the growing threat posed by political extremism and hatred in our society;

Whereas such acts of politically motivated violence are antithetical to the principles of a free republic, in which differences of opinion are to be debated—not silenced—with civility, reason, and mutual respect;

Whereas the rise in targeted violence against individuals for their political beliefs undermines the very fabric of our constitutional democracy and chills the free exchange of ideas essential to a healthy civic society;

Whereas leaders at every level—government, education, media, and beyond—must stand united in unequivocal condemnation of political violence, regardless of their ideology;

Whereas the tragic loss of Charlie Kirk must not be allowed to deepen the divides in our Nation, but instead serve as a turning point to recommit ourselves to better angels, and to the timeless American principles of liberty governed by truth and the virtues of peaceful dialogue; and

LOL. A strongly worded letter will save democracy. When are people going to wake up & realize they’re government is controlled by the same corporations they constantly spend their 💰 money to support?

So now the message is to be scared to stand up for what is right?

I remember when Biden had his administration veto the UN Security Council resolutions demanding ceasefires. Let’s not forget Israel’s control of Congress crosses both party lines. If you want to beat Trump then don’t get outraged over this & then make excuses when your own party engages in similar activity.

The MIC really wants to continue their proxy war.

I wonder if Israel bombed their kids if they would say it raises questions about the rationale.

LOL, settlements are just that. They are a minimal tax to those who break the law, while at the same time telling them that you won’t ever do anything to ensure they actually stop breaking the law. With that being said, lawsuits are expensive & time consuming for both sides. Sometimes, even a minor win can feel like a major victory, especially when corporatocracy is so prevalent in America. It is much harder to fight corruption, when the system continually does nothing but defend it.

Turkey holding their own government officials accountable? The US isn’t even capable of that most of the time.

The bubble won’t pop. AI has become a national defense initiative. The only thing that will pop NVIDIA’s bubble is another chip designer coming out with something better. Maybe someone will use AI that ran on NVIDIA to build something else, therefore using NVIDIA to kill NVIDIA.