According to Hans-Kristian Arntzen, a prominent open-source developer working on Vkd3d, a DirectX 12 to Vulkan translation layer, Starfield is not interacting properly with graphics card drivers.

  • notepass@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is so severe, in fact, that the aforementioned translation layer had to be updated specifically to handle Starfield as an exception to the usual handling of the issue.

    “I had to fix your shit in my shit because your shit was so fucked that it fucked my shit”

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is how games and drivers have been for decades.

      There are huge teams at AMD and nVidia who’s job it is to fix shit game code in the drivers. That’s why (a) they’re massive and (b) you need new drivers all the time if you play new games.

      I read an excellent post a while ago here, by Promit.

      https://www.gamedev.net/forums/topic/666419-what-are-your-opinions-on-dx12vulkanmantle/5215019/

      It’s interesting to see that in the 8 years since he wrote it, the SLI/Crossfire solution has simply been to completely abandon it, and that we still seem to be stuck in the same position for DX12. Your average game devs still have little idea how to get the best performance from the hardware, and hardware vendors are still patching things under the hood so they don’t look bad on benchmarks.

      • mattreb@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll give a different perspective on what you said: dx12 basically moved half of the complexity that would normally be managed by a driver, to the game / engine dev, which already have too much stuff to do: making the game. The idea is that “the game dev knows best how to optimize for its specific usage” but in reality the game dev have no time to deal with hardware complexity and this is the result.

        • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To attribute this most recent failure to an overabundance of hardware variety is a joke. This issue persists on all Nvidia and Intel cards. Why? Because it’s an oversight pertaining to one thing they all share in common: their shared interaction with DirectX.

          Let me repeat myself for the people in the back. The number of items they had to account for with this failure is one. One API.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          This sounds more like hardware manufacturers haven’t provided a good enough abstraction layer across their devices, or they did (vulkan) but everyone is just stuck on bad apis that don’t properly map to the abstractions for the hardware. Or even more likely the publishers cheaped out and pushed something to release when it wasn’t ready like they have been forever.

          • Shadywack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s also a lack of specialized talent. There’s lots of great “talent” at game devs and even middleware devs. There’s just not much great talent that deals with renderers and API development. The vast majority of devs just lean on the middleware developer to push out the renderer codebase. In a situation like Bethesda running their own studio engine, they just don’t have the right people for it. This plagued the 90’s when people were trying to code for Glide, OGL, DX5,6,7,8, and 9. Many studios folded because they couldn’t get their tech to work with hardware acceleration.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pc gaming is and forever will be way better then games on consoles.

          Why?

          I’ve 3 letters for you.

          R G B

          ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

          tbf pc gaming was always a fight for performance, I never felt superior back in the day fighting with qemm, irqs for the soundblaster or glide3d, it’s always had been a shitshow. It was a super shitshow in the nineties, it was a bit better in the zero’s and nowadays it again became a tad better.

          But somehow I enjoyed that shitshow. Still do.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know that’s what graphics drivers do, like, all the time. Every major title is handled specifically. I am not a developer. I heard this from engine developers

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      They released on two different platforms. PCs have so much variation in hardware, it’s not surprising there are issues with it.

      • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s poorly optimized code, and the comments from the top brass has been “lol your PC sux” when they can’t even get it running right on their own hardware.

        It’s not the variations of PC that’s the issue, it’s a design and quality control issue. Direct X and Vulkan are the bread and butter of PC gaming. Microsoft developed direct X to establish a common graphics framework for Windows and Microsoft game studio still fucked up working with it.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          common graphics framework for Windows

          They could have picked Khronos’ APIs. They think they are smarter than everyone else including GPU developers.

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is just classic corpo shit, developing their own proprietary stuff when no one asked for it. Apple with Metal too. Then it falls on developers to write abstraction layers

  • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bethesda needs to start handing out checks to these people for fixing their fucking games dude

    • Nailbar@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s their business model to have players fix the games for free?

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And you know to some extent, having a community help you with your games and find bugs is beautiful and probably pretty fucking cool for devs. But the fact is that the business side of things continues to put a sour taste in all of our mouths, devs included.

        I really hope AI and the like push game devs out of big businesses and into self employment. Of all the types of people, I want problem solvers to have that life the most.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          AI is still pretty bad at writing code, and often makes up API calls that dont exist. I wouldnt get your hopes up just yet.

          • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh I’m aware haha. However I do wanna point out how much of an improvement gpt4 is compared to 3.5. The improvements have been pretty awesome imo even if they do tweak the ways you have to word things.

            Ik a lot of people bitch and moan about how bad it is but I’ve had nothing but luck after pivoting around and wording things differently, following different techniques. But I get not everyone likes adapting so much so it’s fine ig.

            As far as coding goes though I’m not mad about it being ass. That’s prolly the last part we should get working real well considering the implications for abuse we face now without considering the ability for it to write infinite offspring… :)

            Black mirror should do an entire season on AI imo I think it would fucking kill

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          having a community help you with your games and find bugs is beautiful and probably pretty fucking cool for devs.

          That’s all well and fine for free open source projects, but products that expect me to pay money for them need to pay contributors. I’m not donating my time and effort so that some shareholder can buy another yacht.

          • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, the business side of things again

            Totally agree. If it were just a down to devs and players as in open source projects, it’d be a much different story

          • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have completely misinterpreted what I said.

            I specifically said self employed which does not mean:

            • unemployed
            • making less than what they were
            • are in any way disappointed with the decision to work from home, on their own terms and rules.

            Weirdo capitalist begone.

            • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              being ‘pushed out of big businesses’ because a machine can do the same work for cheaper generally doesnt come with connotations of a stronger position to negotiate for the actual workers

              Weirdo capitalist begone

              lol

              • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who was talking about automation?

                I didn’t say pushed out by big business, is said out of. Meaning, they had some form of motivation which was strong enough to move them out of big business dude.

                Why are you picking a fight with someone who literally is wishing the best for devs lmao.

                • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  im not picking a fight

                  you said i misinterpreted your comment, i read it back and deleted my original comment, and explained where the misinterpretation came from

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People actually need to stop doing Bethesda’s work for them. Release after release they just push out buggy and unfinished product and community fixes it for them while they somehow take credit. FO76 was a huge mess exactly because people couldn’t fix it. Bethesda is bad, and people need to see it as such. Paying full price for their products is downright insulting.

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think if they would just price the games more fairly and in accordance with how the game actually plays then that’d be a different story.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would they. Corporations are always most amount of money for least amount of work. Bethesda is lucky, people claim they love their games after community patches them. So they pay full price and never finish anything.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    only issue I see with the game at the moment is that they did not use those fly/land/dock sequences to mask the loading times. I think that would enhance the experience a lot

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really would have. Considering that my loading screens are scarcely longer than those sequences anyway it could have, should have been nearly seamless.

      • avater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        are you on pc? Normally my loading screens last about 2-3 seconds, which is really short and a reason that I dont mind them that much

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s what he means, he could load faster if the animation didn’t exist and instead of using the time for the animation to load, you get the animation then a loading screen.

    • PintShotRiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly it almost seems like that was the plan and then something went wrong and they couldn’t fix it in time

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll play in a year after most of the bug and performance issues are fixed. Which seems like my typical response to any major game release these days; just wait a few months at first.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Armored Core VI and Baldur’s Gate III are two big recently published games that do work quite well. They stand on the shoulders of two respectable companies.

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve played it a little on Xbox since it’s on gamepass and I haven’t encountered any bugs, other than a single game crash. Is the PC release significantly worse than console?

      Doesn’t feel revolutionary but I’m enjoying it. Created Amos Burton and it’s a pretty fun playthru so far.

      Edit: Okay so let me correct that to replicatible crashes after xbox captures (both screenshots and recordings).

      • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve had 0 hard crashes but a few soft crashes since entering the final stretch of the MSQ. Sarah and Walter are stuck “talking” to each other permanently despite Sarah being in my ship and Walter the lodge. And if I try to talk to either of them the game locks up whenever it’s time for the other npc to chime in and I have to reload. I also had a random soft crash where I couldn’t enter the lodge from new Atlantis no matter what I did until I restarted the .exe(I’m thinking it’s related to the convos bug I’m experiencing). Also the weird movement bugs like someone walking away from you during a convo or crew members floating in or through random places in my ship. Also have a flashing texture issue for a few seconds after accessing the inventories in the armory ship habs.

        Outside that I’m getting 50-70 fps with mostly high settings at 1080p.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m amazed that Bethesda has one of the premier game developers in their stead in id Software and didn’t bother to just use their shit. Instead they actively chased their staff away.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bethesda the publisher and Bethesda the developer are different things.

      The publishing arm seemed to know what they were doing, certainly enough for MS to buy them.

      The developing arm is nothing if not consistent. You know what you’re getting into. An RPG, with lots of character build possibilities (even if a particular build overpowered enough for 90% of players to accidentally stumble across it, like Skyrim’s stealth archer build), a handful of memorable NPCs, no real character development, so-so performance, and a shitload of bugs.

      If people are still buying them and still not enjoying them I don’t know what to say. It’s like watching Fast and Furious 10, and going “well that’s fucking dumb”.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I saw the ending of the last F&F by mistake (they sold us tickets for a movie that started an hour later), and let me tell you - that was fucking dumb.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I watched the first one many years ago, which appeared to just be Ocean’s 11, but for people who think putting blue lights under your car makes it go faster.

          Then I watched F&F9 on Netflix the other month. I don’t remember any of the plot. At one point a car did a Tarzan rope swing.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      ID and Bethesda Softworks and both using different custom, proprietary engines. Retraining your entire studio on a new engine is extremely time consuming, especially if it’s a custom engine with limited learning materials, like ID tech. There’s a big cost/benefit analysis there, and frankly, if Bethesda ever did switch engines, I think they’d be more likely to go with Unreal for this reason. Current staff, and certainly new hires, are much more likely to be familiar with it.

    • Lampenoel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well the Creation Engine and the ID Tech Engine follow two completely different main goals: One is build for wide open spaces and exploration with real time physics while also guaranteeing mod support. The other is build for fast paced combat in closed level structures. And I think especially the mod support is important to Bethesda and its community. That’s also the reason why so many people stick to Minecraft java instead of the more performant bedrock edition.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, Bethesda will just do the same as they did with the Creation Engine. Let the community patch their crap and never fix it.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s shitty but at the same time, if people are gonna do it anyway… idk it’s tacky and the audacity to slap a $70+ price tag on the thing? Fuck that

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just wish they would have incorporated the fixes into the game engine at some point. I bet some of the devs would have even signed away the code for free or at least very cheap. It was annoying not being able to use mods to fix bugs in Fallout 76 that were patched in Fallout and Elder Scrolls games some as far back as Morrowind. Sure they were mostly rare like being able to get pushed into the void behind what should have been solid meshes and the game engine seeming not to care as you fall endlessly or it crashed.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    developer working on Vkd3d

    I.e. graphics driver developer. Listen what he says, Bethesda, not many driver developers will point out where gavemdevs act stupid.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m so glad steam hired this guy cause if he was doing this sh*t to cover slack for Bethesda and the huge publishers all for just a personal side project I would lose any hope I had for humanity.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As usual, it takes free labor for Bethesda to get their shit working the way it’s supposed to. What a garbage developer.

  • ono@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks like Hans implemented a workaround in vkd3d-proton 2.10, using the open-source AMD vulkan driver on linux (RADV).

    Device generated commands for compute

    With NV_device_generated_commands_compute we can efficiently implement Starfield’s use of ExecuteIndirect which hammers multi-dispatch COMPUTE + root parameter changes. Previously, we would rely on a very slow workaround.

    NOTE: This feature is currently only enabled on RADV due to driver issues.

    I don’t imagine it will take long for this to make its way into a Proton experimental release. Folks with AMD graphics who are comfortable with linux might want to give it a try.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Do we know for sure that the Starfield devs weren’t able to figure out the problems with performance? I find often with companies, the larger they are, the more bureaucracy there is, and the more prioritization of tickets becomes this huge deal, where you even end up having meetings about how to prioritize tickets etc.

    I would be surprised if the devs didn’t know what was wrong already, I think it’s more likely that management and higherups doesn’t care about them fixing it right now.

    • sethboy66@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Game devs have many teams all with different jobs, for a big game like this you’d typically have multiple teams dedicated to optimization in different areas (and between them). The specific problem in this case was how the game was communicating with graphics drivers (among others), which for any graphics heavy game is very fundamental to performance optimization. The problems aren’t even an after-the-fact optimization sort of thing that teams should have to identify and follow-up on, batching jobs is standard practice when interacting with GPUs whether or not there’s a translation layer.

      When the devs of a core translation API between two supported graphics drivers that are commonplace in the gaming ecosystem have to write code to specifically fix issues with your application you’ve done something fundamentally wrong.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of posts like these also seem to imply that the open source community should somehow be less competent than these companies and are surprised that the open source community can fix these issues. But the open source community has a ton of very respectable and extremely smart developers, it shouldn’t be any surprise really.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be even more direct: there’s a huge overlap between the circles of “works in software dev” and “contributes to open source projects”.

        I really try to do different things at home than work, but I’ve definitely contributed fixes to game mods (why do so many modders fail to do null checks before trying to interact with short lived shit like projectiles?) and open source software I’ve needed to do stuff.

  • naqahdah@my.lserver.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m inclined to believe this, and this likely isn’t even the whole extent of it. I’ve been playing on a Series X, but decided to check it out on my Rog Ally. On low, at 720p with FSR2 on, I’d get 25-30fps in somewhere like New Atlantis. I downloaded a tweaked .ini for the Ultra preset and now not only does the game look much better, but the city is up closer to 40fps, with most other areas being 45-60+. Makes me wonder what it was they thought was worth the massive cost that the default settings give, with no real visual improvement.

    Another odd thing, if I’m playing Cyberpunk or something, this thing is in the 90%+ CPU and GPU utilization range, with the temps in the 90c+ range. Starfield? GPU is like 99%, CPU sits around 30%, and the temp is <=70c, which basically doesn’t happen playing any other “AAA” game. I could buy Todd’s comments if the frame rate was crap, but this thing was maxed out… but not getting close to full utilization on a handheld with an APU indicates something less simple.

    I’m hoping the work from Hans finds its way to all platforms (in one way or another), because I’d love to use the Series X but 30fps with weird HDR on a 120hz OLED TV actually makes me a little nauseous after playing for a while, which isn’t something I commonly have a problem with.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my experience on the Steam Deck is doesn’t matter if I run low graphics or medium graphics (some high settings) the performance is almost the same

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Typical Bugthesda. Am only wondering how did they get this big by only releasing buggy products. I can’t for the life of me remember a single product they have made that wasn’t buggy mess that community fixed for them time and time again without any compensation. Not only that community didn’t get any compensation, Bethesda tried to sell their work and pinch some more money.

    • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yet larian constantly gets free passes.

      Any serious bitching about SF seems to me to be nitpicking from folks who were just looking to bitch at Bethesda. It’s a fantastic game with minor issues that are easily overlooked and don’t really affect the experience.

      • rudolf_enum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Larian is relatively small compared to Bethesda and the game exceeded the already high expectations, it’s a AAA D&D 5e game, which is something people were looking for for a long time. Larian deserves it, and they are actively fixing the game anyway. Bethesda has no excuses to be releasing games that have the types of bugs that they do after having such giant successes like Skyrim. They have the money.

        • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look I like the game so I’m not trying to say it’s bad in any way but you are just making excuses. Pent up demand doesn’t excuse the bugs. Fuck, they didn’t even need to develop the underlying systems, they already have 5e and the engines.

          • rudolf_enum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not making excuses, I’m just saying that Larian deserves to get a free pass on this one for releasing a game that exceeded the already high expectations, not for the demand. And personally, I barely encoutered any bugs in a 90 hour long save…

            As for them “already having 5e”, that’s true, but it’s a system that is rather complex and which only gets more complex with higher in-game levels and items which all slightly modify the game - which is easy on tabletop, but I can only imagine what a nightmare it must be to implement this in a computer game. And as far as I know, there aren’t any other computer games that truly implement 5e. Sure, there’s Solasta, but that’s highly modified.

            As for the engine: I really don’t see it as a valid point, as they had to massively change and upgrade it between D:OS2 and BG3 anyway, it’s just too different.

        • BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          BG3 was basically unplayable for us for about 2 weeks post 1.0

          But also, we really wanted to only play co-op, and the bugs were mostly online related, which is arguably more forgivable.

          But still, hard crashing or freezing every 15 minutes for one of the three of us sucked, and looking at support forums, wasn’t uncommon either.

  • Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m convinced large video game publishers make deals with graphics card manufacturers to force the end user to upgrade, the AMD and Nvidia deals are not for free access to new technology it’s for which ever bids the highest price to sell more cards. There is little progression in graphics fidelity since 2016. We used to take giant leaps and now we take small insignificant steps.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fidelity is always going to have diminishing returns. Perhaps there’s something fishy going on in the video card business, I don’t know that, but as someone who works in CGI, the evolution we see year after year makes sense, it’s not like there’s a hidden untapped potential

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure if it’s such a direct conspiracy, but I’m sure some of this happens inadvertently at least. Developers of big budget games are likely going to target higher end hardware, and API usage that might cause problems on lower end hardware probably sneaks in as a result of that. I’m sure there’s some deals between game studios and Nvidia / AMD to get the latest GPUs for workstations at some discount, which probably means the machines they’re using for the bulk of development are beefier than the average consumer’s (you also probably want a bit of headroom while developing)… But this kind of stuff can naturally lead to higher requirements for software because you don’t run into performance issues unless you’re very serious about testing on lower end hardware… Which you might care about to some extent, but it’s an additional cost that can take away from other aspects of the game, which might make it less marketable (graphics are a big deal for marketing, for example).

      Obviously it’s not great if a game uses API calls inefficiently and that means it runs worse than it would otherwise… But I’m not really that surprised when it happens? Working on big projects on deadlines there’s often a “try the obvious solution, worry later if it’s too slow” mentality, and I’m not sure you need any more of a conspiracy than that to account for stuff like this.