San Francisco’s police union says a city bakery chain has a “bigoted” policy of not serving uniformed cops.

The San Francisco Police Officers Assn. wrote in a social media post last week that Reem’s California “will not serve anyone armed and in uniform” and that includes “members of the U.S. Military.” The union is demanding that the chain “own” its policy.

Reem’s says, however, its policy isn’t against serving armed police officers. It’s against allowing guns inside its businesses.

    • tree
      link
      fedilink
      -129
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      veteran status is though in a lot of cases so I would not be surprised if there was movement to take it in that direction

      • @SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17710 months ago

        Veterans can’t bring guns wherever they want either. There’s signs on every hospital in Ohio.

        • tree
          link
          fedilink
          -61
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I wouldn’t be surprised if groups are already trying to spin stuff like that as anti veteran discrimination, although this article says “armed and in uniform” implying by that language they would serve an unarmed cop in uniform, so I guess they just have to ask everyone in uniform if they have a gun or install a metal detector if they actually want to enforce it

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            46
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Or they could just guess and refuse to serve someone in a non-protected class as is their legal right.

            • tree
              link
              fedilink
              -3210 months ago

              yeah but if they want to do that they have to say “no cops” not “no cops who are currently carrying guns”

                • tree
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -3610 months ago

                  I’m sure the cops can find a way to sue them if they don’t have it explicitly written down or will show up just to intimidate them at anything lesser than being asked not to be there, but we’ll see

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1510 months ago

            Nothing about being a veteran requires you to carry a gun around, or even be pro-gun-ownership

            That some veterans are dumb is just a result of the military not valuing intelligence in privates, and being willing to recruit anyone who can run and do pushups and pullups.

            • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              People understandably want to support veterans but the reality is that the people who go into the military are usually dumb, toxic masculine men.

  • @TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10110 months ago

    Correct me if I am wrong but didn’t the same people having a whinge over this make the point about how businesses have the right to choose who they serve? I believe this was a few years ago when a different bakery refused to serve gay people.

    So it wasn’t about the rights of business to be run without government interference afterall.

    Well there is a shocker.

    • Jaywarbs
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Being gay and being a cop are not at all the same. One is a sexual orientation and one is a job. Cops chose their job.

      • @TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think you may have misunderstood my post.

        A few years ago conservatives got their back up because a bakery refused to serve gay people and reasonable people found that to be wrong.

        Conservatives argued that a business has the right to choose who they serve without government interference. And this was held up in court.

        Therefore those same people complaining about another bakery not serving the police is the same thing. But now the shoe is on the other foot and they are crying foul.

        My post was meant to point out yet another example of hypocrisy from conservatives.

        • @ngdev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2310 months ago

          The point they made enhances yours. Yes it is hypocritical, but is arguably worse on the conservatives’ part since sexual orientation is something you’re born with.

        • Jaywarbs
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          Thanks for explaining - yes I misunderstood and thought you were saying that those who were mad a bakery refused to serve gay people shouldn’t try to ban anyone else from their own stores. Sorry about that and thanks for explaining!

      • @uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Joke incoming: gay community already accepted cops as their kind.

        Or is it? Or did they?

      • @TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        I’m sure there is a message in there somewhere. I wouldn’t know because I’m just a dumb Libtard. But I’m sure those conservative geniuses out there could figure it out.

  • @Not_mikey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    80
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    For some more context this place, reems, really isn’t a bakery so much as a middle eastern take out place. The main store is currently closed down though so the only place they have open is a counter serve food court style place in the ferry building, so the cops didn’t get kicked out of the place, they either went to the counter and the cashier refused to serve, or more likely, they saw the new policy online and threw a hissy fit without actually going.

    The founder is a Palestinian leftist, so this probably was targeted towards cops/military.

    I’d highly recommend going here if your on a tourist trip and end up in the ferry building, not just for the cop hate, but there wraps are great as well.

          • @VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Because I don’t believe that might makes right. I believe that we can be better than our primitive and murderous ancestors and we owe it to each other to at least try.

            As for your assertion on the origins of rights, that’s absolute bullshit. The vast majority of worker’s and other civil rights have been won via peaceful protest.

            You’ve actually got it backwards: TAKING AWAY rights always happens through violence. That’s what it’s for: enforcing your will on those you are unable or unwilling to convince by civilized means.

              • @Naura@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                610 months ago

                I will not fight for Starfleet, but I will defend its ideals. Pacifism is not pacivity. It’s the active protection of all living things in the natural universe.

                ~Hemmer

              • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Ghandi is the only one that comes to mind. And in Bill Wurtz’s “The History of everything, I guess” video he even says “wait, that worked?!?”

                That would be the right for the Indian people to self govern.

                • @VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but since I’ve never heard of a Jamaican Revolution, so I’m guessing they also won their independence without bloodshed.

                  LGBTQ rights I feel like have made huge strides without violence. There was the Stonewall riots, of course, but since then most of the rights have been achieved mostly through normalization and exposure through pop culture and stuff like that. Of course, some people are trying to rewind those, but conservatives are like that with all rights that aren’t specifically for white men.

                • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  110 months ago

                  I was with you right up until this historical revisionism. I’m a Baha’i and we are pacifists. But. If there is a threat to the community, we will start with words and diplomacy, and will end where we need to, to ensure the unity and safety of our communities.

  • @elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7810 months ago

    It’s wholly within their rights to refuse service to anyone for any reason. I hope they stick to their… well, I guess “stick to their guns” doesn’t really work here but whatever.

    • @dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      7410 months ago

      If they are a public facing business, they are not within their rights to refuse service to anyone for any reason. There are protected classes, like age/race/sexuality. So if you own a business like a coffee shop, you can’t say “no black people.” However, police and guns are not protected classes, so I think they should be in the clear legally.

      • @ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        2710 months ago

        What happened to the supreme court cases that said it’s ok to discriminate against protected classes as long as it just so happens to be “against your religion”

      • felixthecat
        link
        fedilink
        2010 months ago

        Unfortunately that isn’t true. Businesses have a right to refuse service for a wide variety of reasons. Like you said though those protected classes are illegal to discriminate against.

        That is why you can have rules, like “no shirt no shoes no service”. So in this case it is if you bring a gun you will be asked to leave.

        Although now if that store was ever a victim of a robbery I would bet the response time is very slow…

        • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          1310 months ago

          Although now if that store was ever a victim of a robbery I would bet the response time is very slow…

          So you’re saying people who become cops aren’t interested in the public good and are more interested in power?

        • @elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s not like police departments give a shit about robbery anyway. They take a report and tell you to call insurance. Better off with a guy with a gun.

        • @Imotali@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          610 months ago

          Fun fact, if they can prove the police deliberately delayed their response that’s a massive lawsuit.

          • @elscallr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            You still gotta convince the city and then who are you really hurting? If the cops had to pay lawsuits out of the FOP pension fund maybe that would matter. If you sue the city you’re only hurting your neighbors and yourself.

            • @orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              Payments for those things shouldn’t come out of public funds, cops should individually be required to carry malpractice insurance. Cop gets found guilty of violating someones rights? Settlement gets paid by their insurance. I bet you’d see all those “bad apples” suddenly being utterly unemployable once they literally can’t find anyone willing to insure their scumbag asses.

      • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        Also the distinction is “no uniforms, no guns” off duty police are still served. It’s actually a little closer to “no shoes, no shirt, no service”.

        As listed in the article some of the employees and regular customers come from war-torn places or have histories of traumatic interactions with police. Hence the ban comes from a place of limiting PTSD reactions.

  • rynzcycle
    link
    fedilink
    75
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    if you’re going to have policies that discriminate against one group of people, then own it, post it publicly,

    …McCray said somehow without even a hint of irony.

    • @smattering82@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -4710 months ago

      Bring on the down votes but my opinion is this will only make things worse. I think people should judge the police on a officer to officer basis. I work in biblical service and the majority of cops are really decent people who are trying to help. There are always bad seeds. Even if a cop is on a power trip if you ask them they will help you.

      In my opinion the biggest problem w the police isn’t the officers it’s the training and culture. They have their hands tied w ridiculous use of force policies and almost no training. But bring on the hate and call me a fascist.

      • @solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3410 months ago

        It’s hard for me to judge them individually cop to cop because literally EVERY.SINGLE.ENCOUNTER I have EVER had with a cop has been a negative experience at best. Every single one. I’m not going to hate on you or call you fascist. Just pointing out it’s like saying I’ve never met THIS wasp before, maybe I shouldn’t judge it unless it stings me! Then surprise motherfucker you got stung, whodathunkit.

        even if a cop is on a power trip if you ask them they will help you

        Fucking bullshit, sorry but not sorry, but you’re delusional man. And I’m a 40yo professional white guy in the suburbs! My god, I can’t even imagine being black from the hood.

        • @smattering82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -910 months ago

          From one white suburban 40 year old to another I understand what you’re saying and as I said before I have met plenty of wasps. I guess what I am trying to get across is that blanket hate for cops isn’t the answer. It’s a very hard job that they are not trained to do and it does attract assholes. But every encounter I have with a cop I start out just being friendly and the majority of the time they are friendly back. Also well aware of my white 6’2” privilege when dealing with them.

            • @smattering82@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              010 months ago

              White suburban 40 year old that works public service in mixed cities with large populations of poor black white and Latino communities so I don’t live in a bubble. Most cops I work alongside seem to treat decent people decently. Again there have been some bad apples but it’s a work in progress.

              • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I think you’ve misunderstood what I meant. You are a white, suburban 40 year old. Your demographic does not get targeted with police brutality, so it’s no surprise that cops treat you well. It’s a form of bias called survivorship bias.

                • @smattering82@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  No I understood what you said and I agree with you. I am aware that I get treated differently. However I have noticed that a lot of the younger cops that I see interact with minority populations much better than older “salty” cops and they gives me hope. There are real assholes too, my hope is things get better. Because I see the cops treat scumbag white people the same way they treat scumbag black people.

              • @orclev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                410 months ago

                Again there have been some bad apples

                Finish that phrase. Here, I’ll start it for you “A few bad apples ruin…”. Any time someone uses the phrase “a few bad apples” and then can’t point to where those bad apples have been purged with extreme prejudice, they’re just illustrating how broken things are and why police need to be abolished and replaced in-mass with a new police force that’s designed for actually helping people with proper checks in place to permanently and aggressively deal with those that abuse their positions.

                The tradeoff for police getting special powers should be that when they use those powers to violate peoples rights, the weight of the law should come down on them like a ton of bricks. If a cop commits a crime, they should have a MINIMUM of 10 times the sentence a non-cop would get. Cop assaults someone and that’s normally 6 months in jail? Cop should get 5 years in jail. Cop murders someone and normally you’d get 5 years? Cop gets 50 years. If there were extremely harsh punishments cops would be a hell of a lot less likely to abuse their positions. You also need to fix the incestuous relationship between police and prosecutors. There should be an independent department purely dedicated to arresting and prosecuting police for crimes.

                • @smattering82@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -110 months ago

                  I like the idea of a new police force but what you are describing sounds like inanity. You had me until you make the punishments 10x the crime. What happens when someone make a honest mistake? Because they had a off day their lives are ruined. Even in this fantasy where the constitution no longer exists who would sign up for that job? You will have to pay $500k a year and have genius lawyer monks doing the job.

          • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Unless and until they start following section 1983 of the federal code, as was written and passed by Congress not as was illegally revised in 1874 by one person that had no authority to do so, they are all criminals and deserve nothing but scorn.

            This only applies to the thugs with badges in the US. It may not apply to your utopian police department.

              • @orclev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 months ago

                Hell no, that’s only going to make things worse. First police won’t do anything if something is stolen, so that’s just wasting your time. As for assaulting you, there’s a good chance that’s going to end up with the cop beating you up instead. You’re better off asking for help from some random passer by, there’s a better chance they’ll actually help. If my house is on fire I’ll call the fire department. If I’m having a medical emergency I’ll call an ambulance. If crime of some kind is happening you deal with it yourself because the cops will either do nothing or make it worse.

                • @solstice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  210 months ago

                  Yes seriously, only thing cops are good for is the paper trail for insurance. Call them while you’re being assaulted and they’ll probably just join in the fray.

        • @SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -1010 months ago

          Not everyone lives in the US. I’ve been working with coppers my whole adult life and have had one bad experience. They’re good people.

      • dtc
        link
        fedilink
        2310 months ago

        You know every time I’ve had something stolen and filed a police report I have not even once had my stolen shit returned. They don’t even call back after weeks to say “hey we didn’t care enough to follow any leads, good luck”.

        And yet they take every fucking chance they can to write my as many moving violations as possible, whether or not they apply.

        The police don’t serve the people, never have.

          • @MajorJimmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            810 months ago

            Fuck the officer for going along with it. They can quit and find a different job that doesn’t make them out to be a piece of shit like the rest of us. Nobody forces them to become a cop, but by choosing to become one, they’ve branded themselves as part of that fucked up system. That’s on them. ACAB

      • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1510 months ago

        I work in biblical service and the majority of cops are really decent people who are trying to help.

        Your inability to see your selection bias and account for it (while claiming to do just that) is beyond staggering.

        Like… you’re saying the words, but then your overall takeaway proves that despite what you’re saying, you have no concept of reality beyond your own lived experience and world view.

        I’m not in the ACAB/Defund camp either by any means, but you should either learn to truly acknowledge your bias (and not just pay it lip service), or just fucking own it and stop pretending to have a nuanced and enlightened opinion.

        Like…don’t try to make yourself sound like you’re speaking from any sort of well reasoned position that accounts for the limitations of personal experience and acknowledges the experience of others. Just say, “Hey, the vast majority of cops I’ve interacted with, I’ve had no problem with. Therefore I think most cops everywhere are decent people and the tiny fraction that aren’t are just an unfortunate and unavoidable, but ultimately acceptable exception that is worth it in exchange for the services police forces as a whole provide for society.”

        Because that’s literally what you’re saying.

        You’re a white guy working and interacting with these cops in a religiously charged setting that already puts you in familiar and friendly territory with them in terms of ideology, race, and gender. These are three huge factors that are all coloring the interaction, and given the closely intertwined threads of American right wing politics with police, religion, race, and gender, every single interaction you’ve had with them benefits from being on their side in all the major categories that matter. With that frame of reference, you cannot possibly (at least while maintaining intellectual honesty) use your own personal experience as being at all broadly representative of that of the average person in the general public.

        It’s like showing up to game day in the home team’s city wearing the home team’s colors and singing the home team’s fight song…and then the next day when you see a story about how many of those fans you met were harassing and assaulting fans of the other team, your response is, “Well I interacted with dozens of those fans and they were all really nice to me. Since I have real experience with them, that proves that they’re nice people who would never do those bad things. Must have just been 1% of bad apples. But overall, there’s no problem with bad fans since they were all nice to me.”

      • @VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Even if a cop is on a power trip if you ask them they will help you.

        I was with you until about here. I’ve seen cops shoo away people in need rather than even deign to give directions. I would say the majority I’ve seen have been very unhelpful and the encounters that have been nice or cordial have been the extreme minority. It’s like their default is power trip mode.

        • @smattering82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -1010 months ago

          Damn you sure are painting with a broad brush. I have been replying to a lot of comments so if you read this reply in another comment sorry. I agree that the police need reform and I agree that it attracts a lot of the wrong type of people. I think their training is lacking in use of force and de escalation tactics. I think they should have more than 2 hrs a year of grappling training and a lot of departments are moving in the right direction.

          I am sorry you have only had dealings with asshole cops because I know a lot of really good ones. Have a great day.

          • @Stegget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            Everyone knows a “good” cop. And every one of those good cops has covered up for a bad cop. Which, by default, means there are no “good” cops.

            • @Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              And then the corollary; Every so often, there’s a good cop that has stood up to their bad cop neighbors, calling them out publicly for evidence tampering and racial profiling. And then the union kicks them out - making them a good person, but no longer a good cop.

              They do their own filtering. Hence ACAB.

            • @smattering82@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -210 months ago

              I agree with you there too the cops need another layer especially for behavioral or psychological calls. But that’s a training and budget issue. Also I have been to so many crisis intervention calls as a paramedic and was thankful the cops were there because they patted down the pt and they had either a gun or a knife on them. Every municipality is complaining about their budget so I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for trained social workers thst want to respond to the shelter or nursing home at 4 am for the psych.

      • @Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1310 months ago

        How many of the “good cops” turn in the bad cops? Oh none you say… Well you might want to do a recount of good cops then.

        • @CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          510 months ago

          Y’all remember when NYPD in its entirety said that old man fell during those protests a few years back?

          Then videos got released.

          Judging cops on a department by department basis saves paper ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • @orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            So you’re saying the system is broken? Well, that sounds like something we can agree on then. The police force is broken, needs to be torn down back to its foundations and rebuilt. Every time something happens with police you always get the same response “It’s just a few bad apples”, conveniently leaving out the rest of that phrase “that ruin the bunch”. Well, those bad apples have been left too long, and it ruined all of them. There are only two kinds of cops, the bad apples, and the ruined apples, both need to be thrown out. We need to abolish the current police and replace them with a uncorrupted version, the rot has set in too far in the existing police force, there’s no salvaging it.

      • @BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        It’s fine to have a different opinion and you shouldn’t be downvoted. If you’ve had that experience of them it’s perfectly valid. There’s just a lot of cops who are secret white supremacists who get outed routinely and that’s genuinely scary. Cops should get a lot more education than they do in the US.

  • @ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    4810 months ago

    If cops want the bakery to “own” their policy, they they should own their policy of racial profiling

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4810 months ago

    Hey now, cops aren’t all bad. I mean 60% of police wouldn’t be caught beating their wives.

    • @Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1410 months ago

      60% of chips didn’t admit to it, that 40% was a self reported number so 40% were dumb enough to see “do you beat your spouse” and went "uhh duh…yep, everyday!

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Congratulations, you found the joke behind me choosing such a specific wording.

        Here is a fun fact, they actually ruled that it is constitutional for a police officer to have IQ requirements in hiring out of concern that someone who did not meet the requirement would not obey orders or may have questions about certain orders.

        This sounds reasonable except I’m not talking about the IQ being too low, I’m talking about the IQ being too high, some departments will actually limit people from being police officers if they test too high on an aptitude test.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4310 months ago

    Even if it were a policy against serving cops, didn’t the Supreme Court literally just rule that a business can deny any group?

    If you can refuse to serve gay people, you can refuse to serve cops. This shit goes both ways.

      • Evie
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Right… why do they have to exist in public… /s 🧐🤔😭

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      True, but court would claim the previous ruling was focused on contracted custom services and freedom of speech.

      It would be pretty easy for them to craft an argument in favor of letting the cops in, as hypocritical as it may be.

      • @robbotlove@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        this is what being conservative is all about. There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

  • @Moyer1666@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    4210 months ago

    The police complaining about something being bigoted? Are they that blind? Or do they really only care when it effects them…

    • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      Aa the ban only applies to uniformed and armed cops and not plain clothed off duty ones they seem to be more outraged by the lack of convenience.

      They seem to have wheeled out their Victorian fainting couch over the barest hint of being told to respect a PTSD trigger safe space for people who have been terrorized by uniformed and armed people. Oh the bigotry! (snerk)