I’ll note that right now, this is a seasonal issue, associated with moderate springtime temperatures when there is a lot of sunshine available.

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is only a problem because of money. Maybe California should install some power storage centers in order to hold the excess for later.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s already some storage: its the #1 source of electricity during the evening peak, but realistically, we’re going to want enough renewables that we sometimes see curtailment

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m hoping to one day install some solar, and looking forward to setting up non-battery “storage” — e.g., electric water heater that turns on when there’s an excess of power, deep freezer that gets as cold as possible when there’s excess power, that sort of thing. It seems thermodynamics is the relevant discipline for these sorts of “storage” methods :)

      As an aside — while smart devices are much maligned, some rudimentary smart features for matching consumption seems like a pretty good idea. (If I ever get around to this stuff it’ll be local control via HomeAssistant.)

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Im a fan of gravity based energy storage. Excess energy is used to raise a weight up a slope and it can be reclaimed when the weight is released.

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is a reason why energy based energy storage is not more developed right now (with the exception of Pumped-storage hydroelectricity). It’s not very dense at all.

          A 15 tons block of concrete that goes up 100m can only store 4kwh of energy. A 4.5kwh battery cost around 1600€.

          Gravity based energy storage seem simple and elegant at first but you go into the details you realized that is far far les efficient than regular chemical battery. Unfortunately.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Absolutely! Living in a city, this gets a bit tricky though. But if I had a giant reservoir on a hill…and another one below it…

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only problem is they need more of it. Some cost needs to be put onto solar to fix the grid. It needs upgrading because solar is making more work for the grid.

      Solar is absoultely good, but it doesn’t come without costs to the grid and that money needs to be raised to upgrade it.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      if you had read the article, you’d know that they are.

      To cope, CAISO is selling some excess power to nearby states; California is also planning to install additional storage and batteries to hold solar power until later in the afternoon.

      don’t just read the headlines y’all. not a good look.

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, sorry I missed that single sentence in the article that is so plastered with ads that my phone has trouble displaying the page. I’ll be sure to do better next time.

          • Dagamant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The site is serious crap on mobile. Between all the poppins and the ads reloading to make it jump around as you read. It’s damn hard to read a full article on a lot of these news sites.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              cool. still not really an excuse to make an uninformed comment. get an ad blocker or a browser with a reader mode before spreading misinformation like that lol.

              • Dagamant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I mean, it’s a pretty good excuse. The sites job is to inform people and they do a shit job of it. I’m literally checking lemmy on my phone while taking a break so when some link leads to a site that’s damn near unreadable I’m not spending my entire break futzing with settings to make it readable. Like I said, I’ll do better next time.

                • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  oops sorry i read “i’ll do better next time” as sarcasm at first. that’s on me, totally my fault.

                  idk what app you use but Voyager has a setting that lets me open all links in reader mode. i believe other apps i have tried also have this option. and adblock plus works great 👍