Republican senator, who flew to Mexico as Texas faced deadly cold snap, complains of ‘serious security threats’ to lawmakers

The Texas Republican senator Ted Cruz, who achieved viral infamy in 2021 when he was seen at Houston airport for a flight to Cancún even as his state faced a historic and deadly spell of cold weather, this week moved a step closer to securing police escorts for lawmakers at airports.

Under an amendment to the Federal Aviation Authority Reauthorization bill introduced by Cruz, members of Congress and other prominent officials, and some family and staff members, will be offered security escorts if they are deemed “currently … or previously … the subject of a threat, as determined by such applicable federal protective agency”.

If passed by the House and Senate, the bill will fund the FAA for four years.

But given Cruz’s scrape with viral fame over his flight to Mexico in February 2021 – a trip to join a family vacation he abandoned after one day, admitting his “obvious mistake” as tweets and memes proliferated – the senator faces criticism and mockery over his attempt to secure security guards for future airport trips.

    • iamericandre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      He’s been doing that ever since the orange turd insulted his wife and then Rafael rimmed his ass

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know who threatens lawmakers the most? Who sends the most death and rape threats? Who it is that’s out for blood if an official deviates from orthodoxy?

    Trump supporters.

    Ted should just come out and say it. He’s afraid of his boss’ rabid proto-fascist fan base.

  • ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ted, you stupid prick, hire your own damn security. We, the American people, owe you nothing.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      One of the reasons he doesn’t need a security detail in an airport is that (at least in theory) they stop people from bringing guns into them.

      The chances of him being assassinated in an airport are very close to zero. The chances someone might come up to him with criticism, however…

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    When legislating for your constituents: Regulations shall be written in blood (and lots of it!).

    When legislating for yourself: Best err on the side of caution.

    I mean did Cruz even try thoughts and prayers first? Shouldn’t he hire a private security detail from the free market instead of embiggening the government and using people’s taxes to pay for his protection?

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’re out there trying to cut government spending and remove laws! Except this one. We need this one.

    Speaking of hypocrisy, always remember that Republicans spent Obama’s entire presidency arguing that he was born in Kenya so he can’t be president. But didn’t say fuck all when Canadian Ted ran. Want to know more about why I think you’re racist?

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      He was also the main push for increasing Congress’ salary a few years ago because it was too expensive to maintain a house in Texas and one in DC. Despite how expensive it is, he is still able to afford frequent trips to Cancun.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Piece of traitor shit surrounding himself with other pieces of traitor shit with guns. What a country!

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Party over people. They’d rather freeze to death in a winter storm than vote for anyone who doesn’t have an “R” next to their name on the ballot.

      • Oyml@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        So if Democrat candidates create a registered trademark for their names and add ®, would the get more votes?

        Bernie Sanders® for president!

  • BillDaCatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    While I doubt that things are actually more dangerous nowadays than before, Cruz has been very vocal about selling the narrative that things are getting worse. If he feels like his life is in danger, he needs to work to make it safer for everyone instead of just himself!

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Awww, poor widdle Teddy-Boy! Those evil leftists are so mean! How heartless of them to hold poor Teddy accountable for his despicable shitfuckery!

  • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly this seems reasonable. Still funny that he is one of the sponsors though.

    • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fuck that. They should pay out of pocket if they want bodyguards. They get enough shit on the publics dime. He could also try not being a piece of shit and people wouldn’t fuck with him.

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        This doesn’t just apply to him. Plenty of legislators are expose to threats from both sides of the isle. And it isn’t like they are going to get 24h coverage from this. This is walking around an airport for a couple hours.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        We don’t say the same thing about the president, right? At a certain point it would be harmful for the country if politicians were subject to physical intimidation. And while we might have feelings about assholes from other parties, what about people with the same views as us?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Weird how he didn’t need this security detail last year. Seems like it only happened when he got publicly criticized.

          Most senators do not have a security detail. Ted is afraid of talking to the public unless it’s on TV.

        • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Let me wheel out a ridiculous comparison to make my point.”

          One is a head of state, the other isn’t. And this isn’t a party issue which you’ve implied in several comment. Nobody in congress should receive protection unless they are paying out of pocket.

          • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            How is it a ridiculous comparison?

            I wasn’t saying that a senator or congressman is of the same importance as a president. After all, you won’t see the president at an airport.

            What I’m saying is it’s in the public interest for our elected representatives not to be subject to physical threat.

            If a senator is eating at a restaurant, and a person or group comes in who they view as a threat, they always have the option to leave. Often there are multiple points of ingress/egress. And they have the option to bring in as much security as they want.

            At an airport you can’t just leave unless you want to miss your flight. There are by design limited points to come in/out at an airport, and the terminals are usually dead ends so even if you wanted to leave it might not be possible if confronted by a group. And even if a person wanted to bring private security they don’t let people in unless you also buy tickets.

            • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you weren’t implying some sort of similarity, why bother making the comparison?

              If a senator or representative feels threatened, they can call the police or find security, just like the rest of us. Especially in an airport, they are everywhere.

              • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I do imply they are similar, I didn’t say they were the same.

                Do you think that an elected official might have a higher risk of being threatened than a private citizen?

                • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  He chose to be a senator, if he feels it’s unsafe he can find a “safer” profession.

                  Do you think that an elected official might have a higher risk of being threatened than a private citizen?

                  No I don’t. There are a TON of elected officials that would not benefit from this change, so this isn’t so much protecting elected officials as it’s Cruz being too much a a fucking man child to handle criticism from the people he’s supposed to serve.

          • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            Generally you can ask if you can speak to them. If done in a respectful way they may talk to you. They may even be more willing to talk knowing there is security there. Each situation will very though.

    • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not. I actually commented on this before in a different thread. I saw him in a Texas airport last year and he already had a state trooper with him and not a single person was trying to talk to him as he walked. That man is in no danger because his persona is repellent enough to keep people away from him.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        And, as I pointed out elsewhere, the TSA, something he decides the funding for, is supposed to stop anyone bringing weapons into an airport.

        At worst he’s risking getting punched in the face.

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This doesn’t just apply to him. Plenty of legislators are expose to threats from both sides of the isle. And it isn’t like they are going to get 24h coverage from this. This is walking around an airport for a couple hours.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t seem reasonable to need a security duty in a place that’s already considered high security. People are screened for anything dangerous by the TSA.

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        In an ideal world that would be true, but if we were in an ideal world we wouldn’t need the security there in the first place. You can do a lot of damage to someone with just your body and there are a lot of people that are violent out in society.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Maybe in the interest of safety, it would be best for everyone if we just kept Ted Cruz locked away from the public permanently, like in a bottomless pit or something.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Agree.

      Many politicians suck, and it’s not good that they’re insulated from public feedback. I think some people feel like harassing Ted Cruz at the airport is the only way he’s ever going to hear what they have to say, so they don’t want to have taxpayer money going to protect him.

      But for those people imagine the flip side: some Jan 6er assholes harassing AOC or Bernie at the airport. There are enough people from any walk of life or viewpoint to mob a politician at an airport.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        But for those people imagine the flip side: some Jan 6er assholes harassing AOC or Bernie at the airport.

        I am absolutely fine with that. They are citizens. They should have the right to approach elected officials in public. Just because they say things I don’t like doesn’t mean those officials should be immune from the public.

        If you don’t want people to talk to you, maybe politician isn’t the right job for you.

        And I would not be at all surprised if that has happened to both AOC and Sanders more than once and they handled it with grace and aplomb. Do you really think they have security details? Does that sound like Bernie Sanders?

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I think the people in this thread are focused on speech - you’re right that politicians should be available to the public, that they shouldn’t be insulated from public sentiment.

          What I’m talking about is violence - like January 6. Just because it hasn’t happened yet doesn’t mean the necessary elements aren’t all there. Some people are getting information from crazy sources, completely untethered from reality.

          And sure, people aren’t supposed to be able to get guns through, but I’ve accidentally brought knives through security more than once. There’s also just plain old physical force. We’ve seen news stories of people dying from a single punch, maybe their head hits the floor too hard.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you’ve accidentally brought weapons through security, that is partially Ted Cruz’s fault. He is part of what controls the TSA’s budget. Why should he be insulated from the consequences when none of the rest of us are?

            Any of us could be a victim of violence at any time. Most people, even very famous people, do not walk around with security details. I know because I used to live in L.A. and saw famous people just walking around plenty of times.

            I’m sorry, but this is Ted Cruz just being a coward. On our dime.

            • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ted Cruz is a coward. And maybe that’s why he’s proposing this. I’m saying regardless of his reasons for proposing it or how shitty he is, I think it’s a reasonable policy.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                And I’m saying it is not a reasonable policy for someone who controls the TSA’s purse strings to not trust them to stop weapons from coming into an airport.

                It’s his fault it happens. He needs to deal with the consequences if there are any.

                And again, this is not a common thing for federal politicians. It simply isn’t. Yes, the president and his family have a security detail. But only after a ton of presidents got assassinated. William McKinley got assassinated because Leon Czolgosz just walked up to him and shot him. But back then, we didn’t have airports or security screenings. And most senators and congresspeople still don’t walk around with a security detail.

                Only the cowards.

                You mentioned AOC.

                AOC got sexually harassed on the capitol steps and does not have a security detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMeF_jwnHMA

                Here she is being confronted by angry pro-Palestinian protesters. In public without a security detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oMkaJ73D7E

                As for Bernie Sanders? Here’s BLM protesters getting on the stage with him while he was running for president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2iMM7m12zE

                Bernie Sanders and AOC are not cowards and are not afraid to be around people who are harassing them in public. Not even when there is no security scanner around.

                Ted Cruz is.