GitHub - Floorp-Projects/Floorp-private-components: Official components code of Floorp Browser. Used for Floorp Official Build
github.com
Official components code of Floorp Browser. Used for Floorp Official Build - Floorp-Projects/Floorp-private-components

The repository for the previously private submodule is still called Floorp-private-components, though it’s public.

https://blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-11/ is a maintainer’s official response to… Reddit, which crossposted me apparently. Hooray!

  • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
    17·
    8 months ago

    The license looks to be Creative Commons non-commercial, which means it isn’t open source, only source-available.

    To be clear: the license chosen prohibits anyone who forks floorp and includes these extra bits from trying to make money from it, but the developer still intends on publishing the source code so it can still be scrutinized.

      • d_k_bo@feddit.de
        8·
        8 months ago

        The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

        The Open Source Definition

            • CaptObvious
              2·
              8 months ago

              Yea, I know. The license doesn’t restrict use. Anyone can use the software for any purpose. They just can’t sell it.

                • CaptObvious
                  2·
                  8 months ago

                  No, commercial exploitation is assumed ownership. It isn’t use. Open source is not CC0 — or at least that’s not the only possible open source license.

                  BTW, I agree that, in this case, the dev is just throwing a tantrum over using the wrong license for his earlier work.