The repository for the previously private submodule is still called Floorp-private-components, though it’s public.

https://blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-11/ is a maintainer’s official response to… Reddit, which crossposted me apparently. Hooray!

    • d_k_bo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

      The Open Source Definition

          • CaptObvious
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yea, I know. The license doesn’t restrict use. Anyone can use the software for any purpose. They just can’t sell it.

              • CaptObvious
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                No, commercial exploitation is assumed ownership. It isn’t use. Open source is not CC0 — or at least that’s not the only possible open source license.

                BTW, I agree that, in this case, the dev is just throwing a tantrum over using the wrong license for his earlier work.