• andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The simple answer is “REFUSE TO BUY THE SHIT!”

    It is literally that simple. I can’t think of a single person that HAS to buy a NEW car. Keep what you have or buy used. Tell the dealerships and auto makers to fuck off! Explain why a person ever has to buy a NEW car.

    As long as people are stupid and buy it the auto makers WILL continue on this path.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The simple answer is “REFUSE TO BUY THE SHIT!”

      “For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.” – H.L. Mencken

      The reality is, individual boycotts don’t do shit because people who care about their property rights are outnumbered by dipshit consumer whores by a dozen to one (if not worse). The only way to actually fix this is regulatory action by the FTC to outlaw this shit as the blatantly obvious violation of the doctrine of first sale that it is.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Enshitification isn’t solved by voting with your dollar. If it did, the printer market wouldn’t be the shit show that it is. You can’t vote for the good if all the manufacturers mutually agree to only produce shit. Only regulation will keep them in line.

      (inb4 “brother is better”, I am aware that brother printers are generally better, but they are far from good.)

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially when the majority of people will litterly drink shit milkshakes every damn day before they ever dream of using something that isn’t their preferred brand or might require accepting some modest trade-offs.

        We all suffer from enshitification because the “average consumer” makes it profitable with their apathy, their ignorance, and their laziness. And there’s nothing we can about that. We’re stuck in these markets with them, and they make up the majority, so they set the trends.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will say, part of that ignorance, apathy, and laziness is an intentional part of our existing society. You can’t spend the time to research every single product you ever buy, because many are stuck working several job, basically everyone is juggling their work, family, and social life.

          A couple months back, I tried putting some effort into finding a printer that had all of the qualifications I wanted.

          • usb printing, no network needed

          • laser

          • color

          • not a brand that will fuck you over (looking at you HP)

          • within a reasonable budget of $300-$400

          And such a product just doesn’t exist. Brother comes close, but the market straight up isn’t producing good things. So at the end of the day all I can do is either get shafted at the local print store, or suck it up and get an inferior product.

          But going back to the OP, it’s so much worse with cars because we have a car-centric society. You NEED a car in this place to have a normal life. Our cities and transportation have been intentionally designed to fuck over everyone not in a car.

          So there is inelastic demand. The manufacturers can do whatever the fuck they want and get away with it.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve succinctly articulated something I’ve been struggling to for a long time.

          We all suffer from enshitification because the “average consumer” makes it profitable with their apathy, their ignorance, and their laziness.

          And then you follow up with this banger:

          And there’s nothing we can do about that. We’re stuck in these markets with them, and they make up the majority, so they set the trends.

          I hate it so much, but what can those of us that actually care do other than try to educate people?

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got an 03 Jetta in good trim with a 5-speed (which hardly anyone makes anymore). I’m gonna keep that fucker alive even if I have to turn it into the car of Theseus.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have a Samurai of Theseus.

        But, My wife drives a 2017 Mirage G4 with a 5 speed, and we are going to keep that thing alive however we can. And it’s fairly easy, because the Mirage is very simple and is made to be easy to repair.

    • kowcop@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will probably continue to buy new cars as I can spend my hard earned on whatever I want. Everyone’s financial situation, wants and needs are different… you shouldn’t bundle everyone else into your opinion.

      That said, I wouldn’t buy a car that has a feature that I need locked behind a subscription… I would just buy one that suits. I am not loyal to any particular brand so I don’t care.

    • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A better solution is to counter market these products. Invest time in spreading content that tells other people how shit these products are. Not buying it doesn’t do much. But spreading the good word does. Its why they pay so much to advertise and market

    • CCatMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason I see is for increased safety ratings, but sadans will never win with the trucks people drive around in now :(

  • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Corp execs literally don’t care about your bitching, and will perfectly coordinate with other companies corp execs to make sure the same blanket policy is pushed and agreed upon by everyone else in the industry, thus making it the new standard and leaving the customer with no choice against it, for the 69 millionth time”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just a reminder, such collusion is supposed to be illegal.

      But we don’t pay attention to those laws anymore.

      • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people who made those laws don’t care nor enforce them because they’re on the payrolls of the people breaking them. Were so fucked as a country.

    • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      "Congress reports that they don’t see the issue, one congressman said ‘lol I don’t see what the big deal is, the market will regulate itself and just don’t buy a car lmao’ "

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good thing new cars are now out of the price range of most people. Credit is not as cheep and easy. All it would take is one place to start making cheep cars in a shed for the whole racket to collapse. And if you look at the history of consumer markets this happens often, even with the collusion and crime.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And if you look at the history of consumer markets this happens often, even with the collusion and crime.

        EVs actually seem to make this more inevitable to me. Most people aren’t capable of building a combustion engine and transmission, but EVs are fundamentally easier from the engineering side. There are complications with the batteries but the overall thing is a lot simpler. I think that’s why there are already lots of Chinese EVs available for like half the price of anything here.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes and no, the materials to make EVs go are much harder to source. I think ICE engines are at this point nearly impossible to stop people from getting their hands on. I think I could source the parts to make a shitty ICE car/truck/thing but the batteries for an EV that has any chance could be hard. I think it does not really matter what the type of vehicle takes the market, it matters more that the current model loses viability as the consumer base can no longer afford or borrow for the modern car/truck/other.

          If you can no longer get a 7 year loan for a 100k plastic monster, you have to get something else. Since there is almost nothing else new, you have to buy used (we are roughly here). Once the used market is hot enough that used cars are worth more then new ones (Think of a lada in hand being worth 2 on order) someone will disrupt that market just out of greed. Once you have another option for a cheap car/truck/thing you will see (or seen as this has happened) lobbyists push to have laws put in place to stop the upstart (CAFE, Chicken tax, motorcycle cc limits etc.). But now you don’t have so much a reluctant market but an impossible one, people will literally be unable to support the old system. At this point something has to give, ether the government protections have to go, the old companies are forced to change, or the increasing the ability of the consumer to spend more (ether though subsidies or cheap loans). I think the overall economic situation means the cheap loans are out for now, subsides are rarely popular for luxury items (the current model has forced vehicles into this category), the governments are not so stable around the world making upholding unpopular laws less feasible, and lastly the old companies are at the end of the day going to pick profit even if it means change.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You could probably just go buy some LiFePO solar kit batteries from Amazon to power your homemade electric car. They are expensive but readily available right now. They have been getting cheaper in the last year though. A 12v 100Ah one can be as cheap as $200 …

            If you took about 30-40 of those 100Ah solar batteries and wired them in series, you could make the 350-400 volts that powers a Tesla and have a comparable but not as good range. 35 of them could be about $7000 to purchase at Amazon prices.

            That’s possibly not even feasible with the logistics of that many batteries, but that’s an example of what’s available on the consumer market and comparable to what Tesla is using to make their Model 3’s power. I think it’s something that could be achieved by a hobbyist with a good understanding of the electronics technology and access to a good workshop. In fact I’ve seen it done on TV when Anthony Keidis had an old muscle car converted to electric, well over a decade ago.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I ment as a car to sell. I could not start a company in a shed to sell a cheap car using amazon batteries at the moment. Also if you look at the work to put those batteries together (aging wheels does a good job showing the effort) it kinda makes small ev production hard. Its not impossible and I would jump on a cheap dumb ev but since you can buy ice engines with a gas tank for less its still the more likely cheap option.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is really happening is your car has hardware features that are being disabled, and you have to pay extortion money for the criminals to not disable them. It’s ransomware as a service.

    So the question is, who wants to buy from a company that is running ransomware as a service?

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just want a vehicle made like they used to be made. No computer chips and physical handles I have to turn to get the window down. An entire vehicle I can fix myself when things break down.

        It shouldn’t be a hard ask, but here we are… Overly complex shit, with many features no one needs.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No computer at all? Gonna have to track down something with a carburetor and hope it still runs. The newest you’re gonna find is a 1991 Oldsmobile.

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know the war that’s being fought by developers against YouTube?

        Now imagine that same energy directed towards car companies.

        I guarantee you the moment this becomes a thing, there will be jailbreaking and a whole industry dedicated to making sure people know how to get all the benefits that their car has installed but not enabled.

        Because if buying isn’t owning, then pirating isn’t stealing.

    • sweetnumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not the only way. Simply refuse 100% of the time to ever buy a vehicle where you have to get a subscription for nothing of value added. We have ALL the power here and we don’t need guns (well, laws, ie men with guns who will force you into a cage if you don’t comply) to enforce it, just don’t be an idiot an buy one of these vehicles. I’ll buy nothing but used cars without subscriptions if it becomes impossible to get a new one without bullshit subscriptions.

      The demand is clearly high, so if it gets bad enough I guarantee another car company is going to start up and do things better, taking business away from idiots who try shitty practices for a short-term gain and a long-term loss.

      Or at least if we’re going to add a law, we need to take away two useless laws, as we have FAR too many.

      • jaidyn999@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Distributors only sell new cars, and the subscription is included in the credit plan. New car and fleet buyers are fine with the extra security and backup these services provide.

        The distributors don’t care a damn what second hand buyers think.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can buy a used car for fleet use. The incentives paid to the people who do the perchancing should be illegal. All party’s know the game but it’s in their interest to keep playing.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they do that? This thing aligns with their interests (more money in the industry)

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remind me how subscription services translate to more manufacturing jobs.

        Hell, half the point of the strike was that the corpos were keeping too much and not giving out raises

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If every car has a seat warmer then you have to manufacture more seat warmers. Supposedly that implies in more work. But I’m sure the companies will find a way around it.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If every car has it you only need to make one kind of seat and you only need one assembly line to install that type of seat. That’s less jobs overall.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re going to write laws making older cars illegal to operate in the name of climate change. Places are already requiring the phase out of new gas and diesel vehicles with the stated ambition of completely switching.

      • jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not outright outlaw, but they will be taxed out of existence. Effectively you will have the choice of paying 10k in pollution taxes or 5k for the functional brake pedal subscription, and this shit will become norm.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s possible but right now they’re pretty serious about banning ICE cars in certain states by 2050 or so.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Car toys is just gonna take in the bucks. These car manufacturers are thinking they can charge a subscription fee when car toys will plug in a little doohickey they just makes your heated seats work.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cartoys will get a dcma notice and be sued into closing.

      They only exist because paid features is still rare. Once real money is on the line, they’ll be sued or even jailed like the gaming modchip developers.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I doubt that. If they can put an aftermarket car alarm, remote start, or radio in your car they can put a different module in to enable heated seats. Car manufacturers really do think they’re gonna stop this from happening but in reality we already have this for a bunch of car related accessories.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And I bet I could wire the heated seats to work without even needing to take a Tesla to car toys. Heated seat circuits aren’t that complicated. It’s a heating element mat, maybe a motor and fan if you have cooled seats as well. You don’t need software. You need a toggle switch and a thermistor.

            Also reverse engineering for the purpose of interoperability is protected by the DMCA.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You could bypass and put your own hardwired switch in. But it wouldn’t be integrated into the car’s gui.

              reverse engineering for the purpose of interoperability is protected by the DMCA.

              “to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.”

              https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201#

              Modchips makers were sued and jailed. Interoperability didn’t apply because they violated the “no commercial use” part of the title.

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I never claimed it would be. Car toys will absolutely do what they have always done to get around car makers and provide customers with the modifications they want. That is not even a question.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Modchips are an incredibly niche product and therefore much easier to target and shutdown, millions and millions of people will seek out how to break the law to get free heated seats if subscription services become widespread

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Modchips went under the radar for years. It wasn’t until they became popular (modchips company making millions in profit) that the developers were sued.

              Like car mods right now, as long as it’s a few, it isn’t worth the hassle because there is no money to take from them. If it becomes big and Cartoys starts selling lots of mod chips that break encryption, they will be sued and possibly jailed.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Heated seats use a heating element which just needs power and ground. They can’t encrypt that.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes you can run your own wire and glue a switch to the console. But it won’t work in the car’s ui. And I bet everything over 5v for USB is off a computer controlled relay. So you’d have to patch into the high voltage battery and do your own dc to dc conversion.

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If it was easy and cheap, everyone would be doing it for all their controls instead of complaining about Tesla’s touch screen.

  • harry_balzac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Officer, I signaled to switch lanes but I forgot to update my card on file so the blinkers won’t turn on. I was on my way to get a prepaid card for the blinkers and to open the trunk so I can get my groceries out.”

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only backlash they listen to is the one to their wallets. Remember Netflix password crackdown backlash?

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like we need to get the ELF and the RTR folks on a conference call.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Oh no, we can’t compete with Chinese manufacturers! Surely if we squeeze the customers just a little bit harder…”

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I hate what it will do to the used car market we as a people need to stop buying these new cars. Like actually make it a shameful act to even be in one of these distopian devices. People love to bully and be outraged, why not point it to something like this that can be agreed on and is not hard to fix?

    • tsuica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      People want the newest shiniest thing. Cars are no longer tools, but status symbols. And people absolutely will not give up status.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that is why shame works so well here. Status does not work to sell if is the status is negative.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Climate conference or whatever, has nothing to say about car makers actively hindering adoption of modern engines/EV?

  • CaptObvious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this shit is why I’ll never own a Tesla — or any other make that pulls this stunt.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just remember to not pay for the subscription and they will eventually stop this particular nonsense.