Donald Trump’s decision to declassify evidence given by ex-British spy Christopher Steele over the former U.S. president’s alleged links with Russia led to the disappearance of two sources, Steele said in court documents made public.

Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination in the U.S., is suing Orbis Business Intelligence, a British private investigations firm co-founded by Steele, over the “Steele dossier” in order, he said in his own witness statement, to prove its claims were false.

The dossier, published by the BuzzFeed website in 2017, alleged ties between Trump’s campaign and Russia, and said Trump engaged in sexual behaviour that gave Russian authorities material with which to blackmail him.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Steele said in a witness statement that Trump’s decision to declassify his 2017 testimony to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation was “one of the most egregious breaches of intelligence rules and protocol by the US government in recent times”.

    His witness statement was made public on Tuesday, the day after Trump asked London’s High Court to allow his data protection lawsuit against a British private investigations firm co-founded by Steele to continue.

    Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, is suing Orbis Business Intelligence over the “Steele dossier” in order, he said in his own witness statement, to prove its claims were false.

    Steele had given evidence in an interview with two FBI agents as part of Mueller’s probe into an alleged conspiracy between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia.

    He suggested Trump’s discovery of Steele’s friendship with his daughter Ivanka had damaged their relationship and also “deepened his animus towards me and is one of the reasons for his vindictive and vexatious conduct towards me and Orbis”.

    In his witness statement, Trump said Ivanka was “completely irrelevant to this claim and any mention of her only serves to distract this court from (Orbis’) and Mr Steele’s reckless behavior”.


    The original article contains 462 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the same guy who claimed Trump got a golden shower from a Russian hooker years ago, and nothing came out of that. Wake me up when something of substance comes from this clout chaser

    • thanksforallthefish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean the same guy who has already been sued by Trump in the US over this dossier and won ? That “clout chaser” ? The former head of MI6 russian desk who is widely respected ?

      If he says trump had a golden shower in russia then he probably has proof. Might want to check that he actually said that though (as opposed to speculation by third parties)

    • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re an idiot because that was never the allegation if you actually read the dossier. The allegation was that Trump paid Russian prostitutes to pee on the bed the Obama’s slept in when they visited Moscow.