The internet is already exploding about Katherine Parkinson, John Lithgow and Paapa Essiedu signing up to the new Hogwarts adventures – and it hasn’t even started filming
It’s almost like we shouldn’t blame others for another. I dunno. Maybe I’m a trans hater like the trans community wants to paint anyone that enjoys Harry Potter.
I can choose what I can and cannot live without. Without your insane judgment and ideas off a single situation. But alas. Nuance is lost on modern society.
Saying “I can’t live without Harry Potter”, that’s hyperbole. Or if you’re serious, it’s just funny.
The argument is that funding Harry Potter directly funds JJ Rowling - whom then proudly and openly uses her wealth to pay for campaigns to enact anti-trans legislation and pays suppot to regressive anti-LGBTQ groups. Its a boycott.
People are justified in judging those who know this yet continue to support Rowling’s products monetarily or act in them as LGBT hostile.
From all the online back and forth I’ve seen though, few care if you pirate them therefore denying monetary support <- that’s nuance.
Upon re reading it does come off that way but I was using the previous commentarys language towards it not being serious that I couldn’t live without it. Apologies lol
Ah, all good. I didn’t downvote either way, just commented to try to make sense of the discussion. Sarcasm or facetious language is easily lost over text - thanks for clarifying
Nuance? Nuance is not to jump to conclusions about the entire trans community and the “insane judgement” of anyone who disagrees with you. You’re making all kinds of assumptions and not demonstrating much ability with nuance so far.
Do you… not know what the word generalize means? It’s to take something specific - like, say, the interaction you’re describing - and use it to infer the general characteristics of an entire community. To reduce an entire group of people to your anecdotes of individuals.
I understand you think my single comment I mentioned is my only experience with this reaction in your community. But that’s just naive and rude to assume id generalize in that fashion. This is consistent behaviour from the community towards this fandom.
That’s… literally the definition of generalizing. As if an entire demographic could be reduced and characterized by your interactions online about a children’s book series.
Ohhh, you’re just a transphobe using this as an excuse to soapbox. Cool. Cool cool cool. Nuanced. Totally. Go touch grass and get a life.
Oh yeah, you’re a trans hater if you’re paying for any HP media. No doubt or questions about it. Straight up scumbag move to be funding that shit.
If you’re paying her, you’re part of the reason she has so much money to give her anti-trans organisations. It’s directly causal and you need to take responsibility for where you’re sending your money. 🙏
If you’re going to make broad generalizations about every trans person like that, I mean, maybe. There are trans people that read HP and trans people that don’t GAF.
I didn’t say I agreed with either of those groups of trans people. They just exist, and flattening trans people as a whole into a one dimensional caricature to frame yourself as a victim is crass any time, doubly so during Pride month.
Maybe I’m a trans hater like the trans community wants to paint anyone that enjoys Harry Potter.
That kind of wild generalization certainly makes you sound like a trans hater.
No one is claiming that everyone who likes Harry Potter hates trans people. But any interaction you have with Harry Potter books, movies, merchandise, etc. makes money for one of the most prominent trans haters in the world and helps her to spread her hateful message. At least pirate her stuff if you care.
I personally do not have an agenda I am aware of. It might appear in that fashion but again. I am a single person with my own emotions and my own feelings informed on my experiences. I am not intended to be some one else’s fucking champion. I’m just annoyed at this exact bullshit in our society. We might agree on literally 99.99% of everything else. But you won’t care. Cause I like Harry Potter!
You came into a comment thread, unsolicited, shared your opinion, and then jumped on every opportunity to argue, in bad faith btw, against much more levelheaded and informed opinion. You reek of enlightened centrism.
You came into a comment thread, like everyone else does. Unsolicited, shared your opinion, just like you are right now, and then jumped on every opportunity to argue, here you still are trying to argue?, in bad faith? Maybe. Not on purpose I’m divergent so maybe I dunno sometimes. Levelheaded? I dunno. Seems about the same level based on above? Informed? Says who you? Confused on that.
Yes. You are. We are asking you not to engage with a very specific thing, and you are refusing. You are stamping your feet like a toddler that we are asking you not to give money to someone that is using that money to fund anti-trans lobbying.
So yes, you are a “trans hater” and need to do better.
You don’t see how cultural relevance has caused HBO to cut JK Rowling a check in order to make this show, which she then turns around and donates to anti-trans organizations?
Pirate or not, people watching and interacting with this stuff and talking about it with other people keeps it in the public consciousness. As long as it remains part of the zeitgeist then Rowling continues to profit from it.
It’s quite easy to find other, better stories about wizards that don’t directly fund bigotry. I recommend Dresden Files.
It’s almost like we shouldn’t blame others for another. I dunno. Maybe I’m a trans hater like the trans community wants to paint anyone that enjoys Harry Potter.
Brother, it’s Harry Potter which is not exactly a thing you can’t live without lmfao
You’re making it sound like they’re asking you to give up breathing
I can choose what I can and cannot live without. Without your insane judgment and ideas off a single situation. But alas. Nuance is lost on modern society.
Saying “I can’t live without Harry Potter”, that’s hyperbole. Or if you’re serious, it’s just funny.
The argument is that funding Harry Potter directly funds JJ Rowling - whom then proudly and openly uses her wealth to pay for campaigns to enact anti-trans legislation and pays suppot to regressive anti-LGBTQ groups. Its a boycott.
People are justified in judging those who know this yet continue to support Rowling’s products monetarily or act in them as LGBT hostile.
From all the online back and forth I’ve seen though, few care if you pirate them therefore denying monetary support <- that’s nuance.
Upon re reading it does come off that way but I was using the previous commentarys language towards it not being serious that I couldn’t live without it. Apologies lol
Ah, all good. I didn’t downvote either way, just commented to try to make sense of the discussion. Sarcasm or facetious language is easily lost over text - thanks for clarifying
Nuance? Nuance is not to jump to conclusions about the entire trans community and the “insane judgement” of anyone who disagrees with you. You’re making all kinds of assumptions and not demonstrating much ability with nuance so far.
I was told earlier to walk into the sea for my opinion of enjoying Harry Potter. I am not generalizing
Do you… not know what the word generalize means? It’s to take something specific - like, say, the interaction you’re describing - and use it to infer the general characteristics of an entire community. To reduce an entire group of people to your anecdotes of individuals.
I understand you think my single comment I mentioned is my only experience with this reaction in your community. But that’s just naive and rude to assume id generalize in that fashion. This is consistent behaviour from the community towards this fandom.
But I’m the one generalizing. Lol.
That’s… literally the definition of generalizing. As if an entire demographic could be reduced and characterized by your interactions online about a children’s book series.
Ohhh, you’re just a transphobe using this as an excuse to soapbox. Cool. Cool cool cool. Nuanced. Totally. Go touch grass and get a life.
Lies and slander. I am not a transphobe. But alas. You are free to your opinion.
Lmao. You don’t use personal experience to inform your decisions??? Wild. Insane maybe?
you were told to go swimming? are you a cat do you hate water or something?
Lol. Insane.
Ever read the Stormlight Archives? You might enjoy them
I have not. Will check it out though. Ty for insight.
Edit: ah Sanderson. I’m reading Elantris rn!
Oh yeah, you’re a trans hater if you’re paying for any HP media. No doubt or questions about it. Straight up scumbag move to be funding that shit.
If you’re paying her, you’re part of the reason she has so much money to give her anti-trans organisations. It’s directly causal and you need to take responsibility for where you’re sending your money. 🙏
If you’re going to make broad generalizations about every trans person like that, I mean, maybe. There are trans people that read HP and trans people that don’t GAF.
Agreed. Thank you for understanding nuance. Unlike others here.
I didn’t say I agreed with either of those groups of trans people. They just exist, and flattening trans people as a whole into a one dimensional caricature to frame yourself as a victim is crass any time, doubly so during Pride month.
I didn’t say I agreed with any groups of people either. Wtf are you even saying here? Lol
That kind of wild generalization certainly makes you sound like a trans hater.
No one is claiming that everyone who likes Harry Potter hates trans people. But any interaction you have with Harry Potter books, movies, merchandise, etc. makes money for one of the most prominent trans haters in the world and helps her to spread her hateful message. At least pirate her stuff if you care.
If you cared you’d know I am a pirate already by my comments here. But. You. Don’t.
you literally came into this thread with an agenda
What? Lol I do not have an agenda. I’m just some dude that wants to enjoy trans people and Harry Potter. (That doesn’t give JK any money).
Feigning ignorance of the meaning of the word “agenda” is not a defense.
You have an agenda. You went in the comments to spread it. And it’s incredibly obvious to anyone who can read.
I personally do not have an agenda I am aware of. It might appear in that fashion but again. I am a single person with my own emotions and my own feelings informed on my experiences. I am not intended to be some one else’s fucking champion. I’m just annoyed at this exact bullshit in our society. We might agree on literally 99.99% of everything else. But you won’t care. Cause I like Harry Potter!
Attempting to both deny your agenda and then asserting it in the same comment. Truly peak.
Does agenda mean opinion? I’m confused here actually
You came into a comment thread, unsolicited, shared your opinion, and then jumped on every opportunity to argue, in bad faith btw, against much more levelheaded and informed opinion. You reek of enlightened centrism.
You came into a comment thread, like everyone else does. Unsolicited, shared your opinion, just like you are right now, and then jumped on every opportunity to argue, here you still are trying to argue?, in bad faith? Maybe. Not on purpose I’m divergent so maybe I dunno sometimes. Levelheaded? I dunno. Seems about the same level based on above? Informed? Says who you? Confused on that.
Or alcohol?
It’s a book about kids fighting with magic sticks…
Don’t know if you’re a trans hater but you’ll certainly die alone lmao. Read another book
Yes. You are. We are asking you not to engage with a very specific thing, and you are refusing. You are stamping your feet like a toddler that we are asking you not to give money to someone that is using that money to fund anti-trans lobbying.
So yes, you are a “trans hater” and need to do better.
Also what money. I haven’t given anyone money. I’m a pirate you dunce.
You don’t see how cultural relevance has caused HBO to cut JK Rowling a check in order to make this show, which she then turns around and donates to anti-trans organizations?
Pirate or not, people watching and interacting with this stuff and talking about it with other people keeps it in the public consciousness. As long as it remains part of the zeitgeist then Rowling continues to profit from it.
It’s quite easy to find other, better stories about wizards that don’t directly fund bigotry. I recommend Dresden Files.
Jim Butcher is also… not great
This is news to me, but I hardly know everything there is to know about him.
Any specifics? I would like to know. I recommend his books frequently.
I’m allowed to enjoy what I enjoy without your personal judgment. I assure you I am an ally but you don’t care because I like Harry Potter.
An ally wouldn’t make generalizations about all trans people like this:
Why not when feeling attacked by a community they defend naturally?
Nonsense. Not agreeing with you does not paint me as a hater. That is extreme cap. Get outta your bubble lol