https://feddit.org/post/13994826/7165181

Everything I downvoted was because I genuinely do not think it’s good. Like meat is not going to cure cancer.

I actually really like eating meat I just try to life a life that gives others room to enjoy this earth too without mutually destroying it.

Please tell me how I am the asshole :)

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    If it is all misinformation and I want to reduce its visibility, why does volume of down votes matter?

    I mean the whole idea of ‘down voting too much’ is that the down votes, which are basically instant after reading a post or comment, are done in a short period of time. If someone takes a few minutes to browse a community to see if maybe a couple of the terrible posts are outliers and vote as they go, is that really any different than down voting them when they are noticed coming through a feed organically?

    Note that nobody cares about the frequency of up votes.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it is all misinformation and I want to reduce its visibility

      You could block it. That would reduce your visibility to it completely.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      it is all misinformation

      If you think it’s all misinformation but you don’t block the community (or even post your correct information), at some point you are just wasting your time.

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      People don’t scroll more than 1 hour a feed. That mean there is no point of downvoting a 9 hours old post that did not reach any top or active posts

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If there is no point because it won’t be seen then there would be no negative impact from the downvotes, and punishing someone for downvoting ‘old’ misinformation would be silly.

        I downvote misinformation because if someone comes across the community later they are going to see those old posts too. Same reason for downvoting a 5 minute old post as it would for a 5 day old post, misinformation is misinformation.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          People don’t go directly in a community. They only interact if they find posts in the all feed and interact with individual posts

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                How is a vote spam?

                Why isn’t upvoting spam? I have upvoted 10 times as many comments as downvoted, and hundreds of times as many upvotes for posts as comments. Is that spam?

                Do words mean anything anymore?

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  If the votes on the internet don’t matter - then the downvote brigade shouldn’t care they are excluded

                  If the votes on the internet do matter - then the downvote brigade is being acknowledged that they don’t like this, and are being given their free time back when they are uninvited from the community.

                  • snooggums@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Why does the frequency matter?

                    Is it a ratio to the number of posts?

                    If I come across a sub with a lot of posts but little engagement should I feel bad for up voting a bunch of them so whoever stumbles across the community next knows someone liked the content?

                    What if they have 6 posts in the main feed? Should I only up vote one of them to avoid spamming? Do I need to pay more attention to the community and not the post itself to avoid being an upvote spammer?

                    Should I only upvote a limited number of comments per post or per community?

                    The whole spam argument makes zero fucking sense outside of multiple people intentionally brigading niche subs, which is bad. An individual voting how they want is completely different from brigading.