• ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

    So hopefully they improve the transit situation in the cities & surrounding areas as well.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

      We can’t build mass transit because then we might need to build more mass transit.

      Also, it would be entirely impossible to expand local mass transit after the intrastate rail broke ground but before it was finished. Couldn’t be done. But we somehow can completely rewire I-45 to facilitate more interstate trucking.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, I knew the feds had cancelled grant money to it, I didn’t know the state killed it. I know they’re all in the pocket of big oil, but it’s just wild to me how trains are apparently woke.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They are woke because they have potential to improve lives regardless of class, race, or gender. Obviously they should have to “earn” those improvements by buying a car instead.

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Quite literally this is why a lot of public transit got cancelled and destroyed - it made it easier for “those people” to come to the wealthier white parts of the city. In my city they literally built an interstate straight through downtown to make it harder for the large black population here to get out of the traditionally-black parts of the city.

            • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              I keep recommending The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein. In the book, he documents how the modern suburb was created through zoning in order to keep Black people out by making living there too expensive, both through the land cost and the car needed to navigate it. It’s really crazy just how open and deliberate it was!

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least in Houston, the transit isn’t horrible if you stay in the inner loop. They gave a few rail lines and the buses run frequently there, so it’s probably fine in theory. But if you have to leave the inner core…

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, you’ve got to start somewhere. CAHSR has been the impetus for a lot of sprawled out central valley cities to get their shit together. Fresno is probably the prime example of this. We’re trying to drag Merced into getting its shit together, though kicking and screaming it may be.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Displacing minorities is a feature. Otherwise Those People might build up generational wealth, and eventually start considering themselves white people’s equals. POSIWID.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      TIL a new acronym, but one doesn’t need to infer the purpose of the system from what it does. The designers of the system said out loud that segregation was a feature. They gave speeches and wrote memos about it.

  • FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    (Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Steal land. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. Steal it again. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. If anyone complains, tell them that you shouldn’t care about the latest set of owners because they bought it off you when you stole it from the last set of owners.

      Don’t ask who profits. It’s definitely not six families who showed up wealthy and have only ever been getting richer for the last century.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there’s in interstate project in the northeast that’s pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”

    • FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.

      (Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).