Transition from: Designed for Cars to Designed for People, Cars, and Bikes
But fuck this shit:
I want my zebra back, this is not visible from far away. And if I don’t see a crosswalk anywhere nearby, then I shall cross the road anywhere convenient.
This I like:
Bratislava’s barely visible pedestrian crossings also tripped me the fuck out when I was there but then I realized you can actually cross wherever it’s convenient because drivers are not out to kill you.
The traffic light is visible from far away and at a traffic light it’s almost always possible to cross a road.
Are there images in your comment that other people are seeing? I don’t see anything after your : characters except a few lines of white space.
Yeah. But Imgur blocks me because of my VPN, so I used Catbox. However Catbox is blocked in some countries.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Edit: From FAQ, blocked in/on/by: Australia, Ireland, UK, Iran, Afghanistan, Comcast, Spectrum, Rogers, Verizon, Quad9.
Hmmm thanks for the info. I am in the US. It is probably just my Lemmy client, I’m using “Connect” fwiw.
…I mean, cars ended up better too. Hella lot more clarity after.
That’s one of the recurring ironies. Most of the stuff anti-car-culture people are pushing for (eg: more trains, this photo, etc) make it better for the people who do drive
Exactly! The design forces everyone to drive more slowly and deliberately. If I was a driver I would be very pleased. The only people that hate this are speeders.
bro you don’t understand i have to reach the traffic light 2 seconds faster PLEASE
I dunno. Paths are clearer and easier to predict, lanes are more defined. In good circumstances, you can safely speed more than before. Not that it’s good idea, but it literally doesn’t take away anything from drives while massively improving safety, clarity and elegance.
When paths are narrow and the sidewalks busy (people, trees, benches, etc) drivers subconsciously slow down because it feels faster. Inversely, drivers speed up in wide open areas because it feels slower. This has been well studied and rebutted earlier urban design principles that thought narrow streets and obstacles caused traffic accidents.
It’s very good, but it would have been even better if they didn’t do the “you’re on your own now” thing with the bike lane.
For sure. Or added the crossing where you have to wait for lights. It’s a small road, it should just be a crosswalk with pedestrian priority and a low speed limit. Not a car priority traffic light crossing.
One solution would be to sacrifice the new gardens on that top road to make space for bike lanes. Of even better, the whole road becomes a bike-first road where cars are allowed in at 10km/h.
seriously, all this and they couldn’t find space to make a proper raised bike path?
Nice. Looks like not one tree was felled, too.
But we need to address these port-a-potties. What sadist would put them right under someone’s window? They have an exhaust pipe at the top!
