Comrades of the European Internet Forum,

enough is enough!

For decades, we have placed ourselves in the cultural shadows - well-behaved, conformist, as if we were the ill-educated child of the great American moral uncle, who must not be too loud, not too naked and certainly not too independent. While half-naked shoulders are censored at high school graduation ceremonies in the USA, heads are thrown around like bowling balls in TV series. All normal, all ‘entertainment’. But woe betide you if you see a nipple - then the censorship hammer screeches louder than a Trump on Truth Social.

I ask you: What has become of Europe?

We, the continent-born of the Enlightenment, the revolutions, the renaissance of nudity on canvas, in stone and on film - we have allowed a country that bottles cheese in cans, of all things, to tell us what is ‘moral’!

It’s not moral, it’s demurely stupid.

Why are depictions of violence in mass media allowed to flow freely like American fracking oil, but natural, aesthetic, tasteful nudity - which has been part of European art and culture for centuries - is algorithmically filtered out, demonetised and labelled with warnings as if it were uranium?

No more prudish double standards!

We need a cultural return to what we have to offer:

  • Enlightenment instead of transfiguration.
  • Pleasure instead of violence.
  • Nudity as an expression of naturalness - not as a moral offence.

I call on you: Banish pixelated prudery! Let’s tear apart the corset of American moral dictatorship like a badly programmed DRM protection! Save the freedom of the breast - for Europe!

Stop aligning your films, games and series with a market that beeps ‘fuck’ five times but completely waves ‘shoot him in the face’ through.

We are not Hollywood’s post office box. We are Europe. We are culture. We are naked! - So, metaphorically. And sometimes literally. And that’s okay.

Thank you for your attention!

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I took my clothes off I don’t know what else is going on but I’m having a good time thanks for inviting me I really appreciate it

  • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I didn’t take my dick out for Harambe, but I’ll do it for Europe

  • dumblederp@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’ve been to a bunch of nudist events in Australia, naked bike ride, nude beach, life drawing events, confest hippie festival and some gallery openings. I’ve also studied anatomy. People need to get their head right about what it means to be naked. Everyone has a body, and should be more comfortable with it.

    Edit: Chatting with yanks on deaddit, they largely seem so afraid of nudity that they’ll be calling the police if there’s an adult naked around a child where in many other parts of the world it’s completely normal, eg modest family bathing scenes in anime.

    • fikniefnadjofullinn@feddit.is
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 days ago

      Let’s just let people groom themselves however they prefer. We need to normalise accepting bodies of all kinds instead of pushing people to some particular ideal.

      • Skymt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hear hear! My shaved ball sack is oh so delicious to touch! (That’s not an invitation btw. My balls are mine)

      • pohart@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think you’re wrong that we should let people do what they want but it’s definitely troubling that so many people want pre pubescent hairlessness in their partner. Maybe we should do away with whatever is causing that

        • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          I see it as a supernormal stimulus: women’s bodies are less hairy than men’s, so a hairless body is the most feminine. Or, the young are less hairy than the old, so hairlessness is the most youthful.

          • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Though one could argue that it is solely cultural, based on the fact that those preferences do change over time

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It makes sense in porn, when the point is to show every detail up close, hair obscures the details. It’s just that so many people then decide porn is what they want to model themselves after, or what they expect of partners…

    • MTK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      I disagree, you were just taught to be ashamed of your body. Just as you shouldn’t be ashamed of your face or hair or height, you shouldn’t be ashamed of your nipples or butt or genitals.

      Nudity is okay, your body is yours, and your nudity is not for others pleasure if you don’t want it to be. Just as I wouldn’t look at your face and be disgusted that you have a nose, i wouldn’t be disgusted that you have other body parts.

  • Pirata@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is unironically great copywriting. Either that or chatGPT.

    I wonder what OP does for a living.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    We are Europe. We are culture. We are naked! - So, metaphorically. And sometimes literally. And that’s okay.

    We are human beings all living in the same planet. If your concern is nudity and the bigotry around it, i don’t think you are going to find much freedom behind the walls of authoritarian countries and “europe”

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m surprised to see your little tricks got upvotes this time. Your pro-russia content is usually too obvious to stand a chance. This comment did not fool me however

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Don’t get fooled buddy we are clearly not all human beings living in the same planet…

  • Bob@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I assume that you haven’t watched any American TV shows for the past couple of decades. Nudity and gratuitous sex scenes are a staple of the American entertainment industry.

    • Mniot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      But note that that’s about nudity and sex being the same, and the sex is pornographic (that is, the intent in showing it is to arouse the viewer). The OP is about non-sexual nudity. In fact, OP doesn’t mention sex at all, but I feel like it’s reasonable to extend the argument to non-pornographic depictions of sex.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        That’s also true. Actually, I think they’re (edit: sex and violence) both intended as pornographic in their own way.

        • portal9021@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think, there is a strong difference between pornography and artistic nudity and those should not be viewed as the same.

          From Wikipedia on Nude (Art):

          Kenneth Clark noted that sexuality was part of the attraction to the nude as a subject of art, stating “no nude, however abstract, should fail to arouse in the spectator some vestige of erotic feeling, even though it be only the faintest shadow—and if it does not do so it is bad art and false morals”. According to Clark, the explicit temple sculptures of tenth-century India “are great works of art because their eroticism is part of their whole philosophy”. Great art can contain significant sexual content without being obscene.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Ah, to be clear, gratuitous sex and gratuitous violence are both pornographic in their own way. Sorry, my bad.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh. Violence is still way more prominent. If feels like the whole point of the first 5 minutes of every cable show is presenting in vivid on-screen detail a new and unheard of way a person can be horribly hurt. Nudity is unusual and worth remembering, though.