I regret nothing. Say what you want.

Edit: I just saw the two typos. If you find them, you’re welcome to keep them.

  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Vim and emacs are text editors.

    Vs code is a code editor (but really it’s also just a text editor)

    Maybe they mean IDEs like visual studio?

    I’ve never really heard it called a coding GUI before.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    At uni I did a lot of my Java coursework in notepad, then I’d have to take it into a computer lab on a floppy, tar it and upload it to a unix terminal so it could be emailed to the professor. Java syntax with only the command line compiler is not fun.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I write all my code on paper and use OCR to convert it. It almost works sometimes.

  • AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I genuinely do a lot of coding in Kate, the standard KDE editor. It’s enough to do a lot of things, has highlighting, and is more than enough when you just need a quick fix.

    I am also still using nano when editing stuff in the terminal. Please, don’t judge me.

    • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      To be fair, Kate isn’t just a text editor, it actually is an IDE. The text editor version would be kwrite, which would be horrible to program in.

    • SatyrSack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      KWrite is the standard text editor. Kate is the advanced one. The name actually literally stands for “KDE Advanced Text Editor”

        • SatyrSack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Huh, I did not know that any didn’t. I just tried a bunch, and here is a quick breakdown of what was preinstalled on each:

          distro Kate kwrite
          Fedora false true
          KDE Neon true false
          Kubuntu true false
          Manjaro true true
          SteamOS true true
    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yep, I came here to say that Kate is really nice. Even though I’m an emacs user and won’t use it.

      Nano, on the other hand, can’t do almost anything, so I can’t recommend that people make heavy use of it. It’s ok for random small edits, but that’s it. (By the way, YSK that you can set your terminal to use Kate as the default editor by setting the $EDITOR variable.)

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Me too. I’m still not sure what the problem is and I’m kind of afraid to ask.

      I do have the plugin for multi-line editing set up, I guess.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Geany is a nice GUI option. It’s a bit more capable but still lean.

      It’s probably time for me to re-evaluate the host of coding editors out there. For the most part I just use good text editors. Though I do love Spyder, I only use it for a certain subset of tasks.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This feels a little bit like Brainfuck tbh.

      For what it’s worth, I can think of one thing that would make brainfuck even worse: Instead of using 8 arbitrary characters (it only uses > < + - . , ] and [ for every instruction) for the coding, use the 8 most common letters of the alphabet. Since it ignores all other characters, all of your comments would need to be done without those 8 letters.

      For example, “Hello World” in brainfuck is the following:

      ++++++++[>++++[>++>+++>+++>+<<<<-]>+>+>->>+[<]<-]>>.>---.+++++++..+++.>>.<-.<.+++.------.--------.>>+.>++.
      

      If we instead transposed those 8 instructions onto the 8 most common letters of the alphabet, it would look more like this:

      eeeeeeeeaneeeeaneeneeeneeenesssstonenentnneasostonnIntttIeeeeeeeIIeeeInnIstIsIeeeIttttttIttttttttInneIneeI
      
    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is such a waste of time to the point where it infuriates me. I know the standard answer is “why not?”, but it’s just cringe to, like you are trying too hard to purposely be stupid, whereas with standard text editor you can say already they cba’ed to install anything so it was a case of initial setup vs. long term productivity.