Summary

The White House confirmed that Elon Musk is working as a “special government employee” under Trump, granting him significant authority to cut federal spending.

Musk has a government email, office space, and access to sensitive Treasury systems. His team abruptly shut down USAID headquarters on Monday.

Musk is consolidating unchecked power, raising legal and ethical concerns, particularly given his federal contracts.

Musk is unpaid and may not be required to disclose financial interests.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As Jon Stewart said “it has been done within the confines of our legal system, therefore it’s not fascist”

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No no, violence is not the answer. Someone really needs to send him to Guantanamo Bay, outside of US jurisdiction, and introduce him to all the immigrants he’s illegally detained. They can each take a piece of him.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          Violence is the last recourse of the failure to properly manage a situation.

          Violence has never been the only answer. Human civilization works only because of this fact, if violence was the only answer we would never have risen beyond a baboon troop size.

          Literally billions of low level conflicts are solved daily without violence.

          In saying the above, “violence is never the answer” is categorically wrong. It has in fact been used throughout history to great effect, but also to terrible effect. We have to be very careful where we apply violence, it tends to make things much worse before they get better (if they do at all).

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          It’s amazing how many guns we have, how pro 2A we are, how much pride we carry over things like the American Revolution, and we say dumb shit like violence is never the answer.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Elon can’t do and won’t do anything without our approval,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday.

    Any bets on how long it will be until Elon does something so unpopular that there’s blowback on Trump and it becomes “Elon acted on this alone and I had nothing to do with it.”

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I insist on only calling him President Musk because I know when he takes enough attention and credit from Trump, Trump will get mad and tell Elon to fuck off.

        • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 hours ago

          We can only hope. This morning, I saw multiple news articles with “President Musk” in the title. I suspect it’s intentional for that reason. But at minimum, I hope it’s starting.

  • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So is there no conflict of interest with the companies he runs getting federal contracts? Don’t politicians need to put their companies into some type of trust where they can’t run it and make decisions that would be in their favour? I mean I know it doesn’t work like that with stick trading (cough cough Pelosi).

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Company he runs? You really think he has time to run 5 companies while jerking off on twitter and now is spending his time jerking off in the treasury. The man just does what ever he feels. None of it is remotely called “work” he’s basically a walking jerk off

    • hydroxycotton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I brought up the conflict of interest to a trump coworker and he deadass said, “I get the conflict of interest, but I just don’t care.” The mask is fully off.

      Edit: not that I’m surprised, just depressed and somewhat bewildered

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Trump did away with the trust thing. And they let him because it wasn’t a law, it was just something that was understood to be done. No talk of him doing it this time either.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I imagine that as a formality Musk’s recommendations go past Trump, then to Russell Vought who is head of the OBM (office of management and business), and the actual official in charge of funding allocations.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Is that the appropriation bill that fills the annual budget? Would the OBM be more like, allocation of those funds? I don’t know much about this stuff.

          Would dems even have the votes to “shut down the government” that way? Is that in June/July?

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Fat chance. I read he brought in his own server and connected it to the network at the OMB to spam emails to federal employees. That seems highly illegal.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Gosh, I remember a quaint time in the olden times when having your OWN EMAIL SERVER was something worthy of being lined up against a wall and shot for.

        Guess that only applies to Democratic candidates for President named Hillary.

        Also, and it bears repeating - I guess this would have been jUsTaSbAd under Kamala, because something something neoliberal argle bargle status quo genocide…

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Legality is just words on a piece of paper if nobody is going to enforce it.

      • wagesj45@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I tend to agree, but we should at least try. Pull every lever of governance we have for as long as we have it.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I don’t disagree but it’s not as if we’re dealing with people who have any sort of integrity or honor, who’ll accept when they’ve done something wrong.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Doubt it. I bet they’ll try to classify any of his communications as presidential advice, which would make them privileged communications not subject to foia

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The richest man on the planet who once joked about ending world hunger is cutting federal spending of the richest and most powerful nation on the planet. Let that sink in for a moment.