• bier@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If this would also mean I can drive at the max allowed speed and can’t get fines I would actually like this. I don’t really feel the need for speed anyway, the maximum allowed speed usually is fine for me. But some countries like France switch a lot between 130 and 110, so most of my speeding tickets are because I didn’t see the 110 sign immediately and there is a speed camera.

    If this solution let’s you go a max speed with zero tickets I would use it.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      France loves to put the camera at the bottom of a hill, just after a speed reduction… Honestly the way it currently works feels like it’s adding more danger than anything. I drive at/below the speed limit always but you see everyone’s behaviour changing before the cameras in ways that don’t always seem safe.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve seen Norway master this technique. Top of the hill: 90. Sloping downwards, getting steeper and steeper (like, super steep). Almost near the bottom: 70, 5 meters further a speed cam. And those slopes are no joke. You need to clear your ears, they are that high. By the way, those 70 signs aren’t visible from far, due to the terrain and greenery. It’s already hard staying at 90 with constant braking. So it’s a new set of break pads after every step hill.

        This wasn’t just once, I’ve seen it many times during my holidays there, spread throughout the country.

    • CaptObvious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This became such a problem in the US that many states now outlaw or severely restrict speed cameras.