• @ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    12510 months ago

    /c/fuckcars : “use some other form of transportation!”

    Also /c/fuckcars: “No! Not like that!”

      • @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Unless you live in an extremely remote place not served by roads. The arctic for example. It’s not technically commuting as in going to and from your 9 to 5, but plenty of small northern communities are still completely dependent on small gravel runways or even bushplanes for things like going to the doctor or dentist, or really anything they need to go to a city for, which is a lot of things.

        I actually thought this was a similar situation, that they’re so out in the middle of nowhere flying is significantly more convenient than driving. But then I took a look at the map and realized that they’re not far from Chicago and are within easy driving distance from nearby smaller towns, which makes this way harder to justify though still mildly interesting.

        • @oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          One of the first things my instructor told me was “I hope you’re getting your license for fun or a job, and not planning on commuting. Eventually you’ll get stuck somewhere due to the weather.”

          Heavy, powerful commercial jets have deicing systems. They also have the benefit of an entire team of air traffic controllers on takeoff and landing – and they still get grounded by weather. Small planes are grounded by such inclement weather as “fog”, “thunderstorms”, “high winds”, and “low cloud cover”.

    • @Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      -7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why not? Less risk of being hit by a plane if they’re in the sky and requirements for a pilot license are much stricter. In a plane crash occupants are more likely to die than innocent bystanders, compared to cars that are designed for safety only for those on the inside.

      • @elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Why not? Probably because:

        Bike pollution: .

        Car pollution: oooooooooo

        Plane pollution: OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO

        (bike pollution is slightly more than nil just because of the CO2 we breathe out while riding)

      • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I dunno, I was supposed to get 100hrs of driving experience in order to get my license. Meanwhile the minimum required for a PPL is 40, and only 20 of that is required to be with an instructor. You can get away with fewer if you are just getting a Light Sport license, and an Ultralight requires no license at all (seriously though, get training).

        • @Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          910 months ago

          [INTRO]

          Tom Scott (with his characteristic enthusiasm): “Hello, lovely internet denizens! Today, we find ourselves in a comment thread, delightfully jesting about my propensity to dive into the oddest corners of knowledge. From the physics of shoelaces to the mysteries of quantum buttered toast, we’ve covered it all!”

          [SMILE AND NOD]

          Tom Scott: “Now, I can already predict a few of the replies that might pop up here. ‘Tom, why not delve into the intricacies of a potato chip next?’ Well, who knows, that might just be on the horizon! And yes, someone will undoubtedly ask about the physics of a cat’s purr. It’s been on the list for a while, folks!”

          [CONFIDENT NOD]

          Tom Scott: “But you know what they say, the quest for knowledge knows no bounds! So, let’s keep the laughter rolling and the curiosity burning. What’s next, you ask? Well, that’s anyone’s guess! Stay tuned, stay curious, and let’s keep this adventure going!”

          [OUTRO]

          Tom Scott (looking bemusedly at his busily buzzing phone): “Well, it seems the replies are pouring in already! I might be here for a while trying to keep up with all your brilliant comments. But hey, that’s the joy of it, isn’t it? The learning never stops! Keep those questions and suggestions coming, and I’ll do my best to tackle them in the videos to come.”

          [TOM SCOTT SMILES AT THE CAMERA]

            • @Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              [Hard cut to specialist]

              [Overlay with a Scandinavian name and the title, “Expert in online discussions”]

              “Mange tror at internetdiskussioner er sunde. Det er et indtryk vi har arbejdet mange år på at kultivere så vi kan påvirke folks meninger uden at blive opdaget i det. Vi fik blandt andet Tom til at lave denne video blot for at få mig med i den!”

              [Cut back to Tom]

        • @n00b001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          Very true, even the 99% global human population reduction of 2025 he’s already recorded and got ready to go

      • @viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        Are you sure? I’ve seen a video about this community, but I don’t think it was Tom Scott. Couldn’t find it on his channel.

        • @Guest_User@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          510 months ago

          Wow, I’m actually pretty sure I’m wrong on this. I’m just now checking on my lunch break but I can’t find it. I know I saw a video about this (or a very similar) community following specifically one man who has a hanger house. Swore it was Tom Scott but, I just can’t find it… Don’t tell me I hallucinated it lol

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      These exist all across the country! Here’s a fun fact, the street signs are all 2 feet tall in these neighborhoods so that even low-wing airplanes can make turns around corners that have signs without risk of completely destroying their plane.

    • nyoooom
      link
      fedilink
      3510 months ago

      Depends, looks like small planes, and even if 10 come and go everyday you would quickly stop hearing them at all (the brain is very good at ignoring useless stimuli)

        • @Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1810 months ago

          Eh, if you’re living in a air park like that one, chances are you’re a planespotter or an aircraft owner/pilot yourself, I’ll wager the sound is music to those guys ears. I certainly doubt anyone will complane, I mean they should know exactly what they signed up for.

        • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          I’ve got you bud.

          Get some good speakers. Install an ad blocker (for now) and play “Air conditioner sound, 10 hours” on YouTube. It won’t annoy your neighbors, you can just say, “it’s muh humidifier” if anyone asks, but they probably won’t. Barking dog? Not in your bedroom. Vacuum cleaner? Nope, won’t hear it.

          And you’ll get to where you can’t sleep without it.

          I should download that video.

        • @SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I work at an airport. Cessnas and other small prop planes are perfectly fine and I think they are quieter than a harley for example. I bet those planes are the vast majority of planes flown in that pic of the neighborhood.

          Once you put jets on things it can get annoying. Even small business jets are pretty loud for their size, not to mention commercial airliners coming and going.

        • nyoooom
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Oh your brain processes those sounds for sure, but it mostly filters them out so, unless there is an unexpected sound, you don’t pay attention to them

          • @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No, exactly this was disproven again and again the last few years. The unconscious sounds add to the stress level too, makes you sleep worse, etc.

            Ok, may be different with only every hour or so. The studies are usually with constant traffic noise (like neighbourhood to airports, main roads).

            • nyoooom
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              Not sure if there is a misunderstanding but I’m agreeing with you

              When I say the brain processes it, it means it does take some work and energy, although it might not bring it up to your conscious perception for you to react

        • @Urbanfox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          At the end of my in laws small 8mx8m garden is a freight train line, and honestly, you just don’t hear it anymore once you’re used to it.

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      See, there are some weird types like me who actually like the smell of 100LL, and don’t mind plane noise. I’d live there. But yeah, it’s definitely not for everyone.

    • @oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Small airports like these really don’t smell like much. Sure: the fueling area, hangers, and maintenance shops have a smell, but it’s non existent as soon as you’re 50 feet away from them.

      What is fucked up is how much leaded fuel gets dumped on the ground. Part of the pre-flight check for planes is taking a sample of gas from the lowest point in the tanks (the “sump”) to make sure there’s no water in it. It’s usually done with a tool like this one. A lot of pilots just toss the fuel sample on the ground rather than “dispose” of it properly.

  • Ian@Cambio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3310 months ago

    Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.

    • @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2010 months ago

      Clarification: Only piston aircraft require leaded fuel. Which is unfortunately a pretty big part of the general aviation market, but similarly sized turboprops do also exist (though are more expensive) and it doesn’t apply to modern commercial aviation at all.

      • @Fox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        1410 months ago

        Further clarification: Only gasoline powered aircraft without the Auto Fuel STC require leaded fuel.

        Although, there is an initiative underway to fully phase out leaded avgas. G100UL is the FAA approved formulation. Exciting time and long overdue.

    • @Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      Yep, and the FAA is taking it’s sweet time to approve a new unleaded fuel for general aviation that shows a lot of promise called G100UL. It’s estimated it could take another 6-9 years. Otherwise it’s currently only approved for specific planes and not available at most airports and aerodromes.

      • @rexxit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s approved as of last fall, but the FAA spent well over a decade stonewalling it with unnecessary bureaucracy.

        Now we’re left with the chicken-and-egg problem of the market, where nobody will offer unleaded because it’s more expensive, but it’s expensive because it’s not widely used. The feds should subsidize it down to $4/gal for 5 years to get it off the ground.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 months ago

    That’s a lot leaded fuel to be inhaling everyday.

  • @otacon239@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    410 months ago

    I have a friend who lives in one of these neighborhoods but right in the middle of a city. Blows my mind that it was there the whole time and I just never noticed until I went to his house.

    • @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Railroad suburbs exist! Streetcar suburbs as well. Was actually the norm outside of the city core until they started ripping up all the rail lines to build highways.

      • @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Imagine showing up to an HOA meeting with a presentation on why we need to spend ten million dollars on a localizer and glideslope array so Larry wouldn’t have to divert to O’Hare when it’s foggy again.

  • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    I guess it works as a pilot neighborhood but Rich people would never want to live in such an obvious place. Makes them too easy to eat.