• @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      By pointing to evidence to back my claim and asking for consistent standards and something vaguely resembling the rule of law?

      How do you propose we make the conversation better?

        • @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          By all means, tell me what their position is. Failing that, what’s the charitable assumption to make here?

          As far as I can see, the likely options are:

          • They support the genocide

          • They don’t care about the rule of law

          The former is more common in this context, but it’s both weird and worthless of you to insert yourself into the conversation to defend someone’s positions that (unless you can confidently answer this question) you don’t understand. Just like that, you’ve derailed the conversation into this irrelevant shit - what was your complaint again? Oh…

          • @Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            -13 months ago

            As far as I can see, the likely options are:

            You can’t see very far then.

            I don’t agree with your position, so you’re probably racist. Good day.

                • @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  03 months ago

                  Are you implying keyboard activism when there might be none in order to bolster your weak argument?

                  Trot on, you weird hypocritical defender of genocide deniers.

                  • @Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    03 months ago

                    Quote where they denied genocide.

                    I’m not defending them. I’m pointing out your shit reasoning.

                    Are you 15 years old and trying to sound edgy and trendy? Are all your friends keyboard activists and you’re feeling peer-pressured into typing nonsense?