previously misericordiae@kbin.social

  • 18 Posts
  • 154 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 3rd, 2024

help-circle

  • Finished I’m Afraid You’ve Got Dragons by Peter S. Beagle. In general, I think it has pacing and tonal issues (be aware that it’s not cozy all the way through!), but it was also cute in, like, an 80s-YA-fantasy kind of way. I don’t regret reading it, but I think there are better books to recommend.

    Currently reading Fever House by Keith Rosson. I guess I’d call this action horror? There’s a severed hand that makes people near it want to be overly violent, and various players trying to acquire or get rid of it. Fast read, enjoyable so far.




  • The answer is no, because factions like corrupted have 3 possible reactions to each damage type: vulnerable, resistant, or neutral. The point of the test was to see if your UI is incorrectly listing both neutral and resistant damage types under “Resistances” (it is), or whether something about damage levels has actually changed (it hasn’t).


  • Interesting, sounds like a bug then. I did some brief simulacrum testing with just serration and a single 60% elemental mod in a gun, and resistances are working for me as per the wiki. In other words, corrupted lancers (listed as vulnerable to puncture and viral, resistant to rad) take less damage from rad (230 per hit) than they do from magnetic or cold (279 per hit).

    Please do test this yourself, though! It’d be hilarious if it was more than a UI thing for you.



  • So I just checked in game (on PC), and my codex for frontier lancers looks like this:

    screenshot of frontier lancer information from the codex, which lists no resistances at all

    Is it a platform thing, maybe, or a bug? My guess is, that list you have is less “vulnerable/resistant” and more “vulnerable/not vulnerable”, just worded weirdly. What does it say for enemies from late game factions that have documented resistances, like the murmur?


  • misericordiaetoBooks@lemmy.worldCan we update the Icon for the community?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I like the idea (and it’s very cute!), but it feels a little busy. I think that could be solved by simplifying the book shape, if you’re down to give that a shot (feel free to ignore me, ofc). Two suggestions to try, not sure if either will work:

    • Get rid of the inner black line and the orange, and use a single black line down the middle for the crease instead. If the book shape isn’t strong enough at that point, you can always try thickening up the edge, or coloring the whole shape.
    • Alternatively, remove the black outline (and the orange fill) entirely (apart from a center book crease), and just have the ears, nose, and whiskers (maybe also eyes?) be a different color. Let the book be the highest contrast shape, so it’s obvious.

    EDIT: Ok, look, I was impatient to see what it could look like, so I did it myself. (I may have gotten a little carried away.)

    An updated version of a logo by @Mem@discuss.tchncs.de, of an orange and white book-faced lemming on a purple-blue background.

    @Mem@discuss.tchncs.de, YOU DID SO GOOD! LOOK HOW CUTE IT IS.


  • Still reading I’m Afraid You’ve Got Dragons by Peter S. Beagle. It’s still light and fluffy fun, but it’s starting to feel kind of muddled. Like, I thought I was getting a story about a dragon catcher that hates his job, but that’s been sidelined in favor of a story about a prince that doesn’t want to rule. There’s been a sprinkle of “legendary dragon? nah, that doesn’t exist anymore” foreshadowing, but the plot’s been very low stakes otherwise. Not sure if it’s a framing issue (there’s a lot of POVs) or a narrative one, but maybe it’ll all come together later on.





  • Finished The Truth of the Aleke by Moses Ose Utomi. Twistier and grimmer than the first book; hoping the third (when it comes out) will have a satisfying conclusion. One note: if you decide to read this one by itself, with the thought that you might read the rest of the series later, just be aware that it spoils the ending of the first book.

    Started I’m Afraid You’ve Got Dragons by Peter S. Beagle. Light and fluffy fairy-tale-type story so far, without the melancholy undertones I remember The Last Unicorn (understandably) having. Reviews seem mixed about the second half, so we’ll see how I feel about it when I get to that point!


  • Last week, I read The Lies of the Ajungo by Moses Ose Utomi, and now I’m reading the sequel, The Truth of the Aleke. These are both African-inspired fable-like fantasy novellas about teenagers saving oppressed desert cities. Obviously, I enjoyed the first well enough to read the second, but I think they would have been better listed as YA, as both volumes feature not-so-subtle lessons about the bad guys and predictable plot twists that might have seemed fresher/more relevant to that audience.

    (Sidenote: if you’re doing book bingo and need a quick disability rep. hard mode, The Truth of the Aleke is only ~100 pages, and seems to work as a standalone so far.)







  • I read a fair amount of Enid Blyton as a kid, and remember enjoying the Five series. Does it hold up well?

    Still haven’t been getting much reading done; I’m not even a third of the way through Between Two Fires yet! It has been enjoyable so far, though, with a lot of clever medieval flavor that reminds me of Arthurian legends, or monsters doodled in the corners of old manuscripts. I suspect there’s probably some Canterbury Tales influence as well, but it’s been a long time since I had to read them.