• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Batman could solve more crime by domating some of his vast wealth to support the impoverished in Gotham than he ever does by beating up criminals.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t it canon that he does that a lot already?

      It’s just that it’s like filling a sieve with a tap. Unless you block the holes, you’re never going to get anywhere.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yep. Batman deals with immediate problems, like someone being mugged, and Bruce deals with long term problems, like governmental corruption. And Bruce actually is fairly consistently depicted as having made progress there. Supervillains and the Court of Owls continue to be problems, but he’s usually dismantled the local mafias and cut down on police corruption inside of a few years.

        • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah this conversation pops up at least once a week, and Batman is so prolific that I feel people not understanding this is a literacy problem.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      My favorite depiction of Batman is the Harley Quinn TV show, where he (third season spoilers):

      spoiler

      Gets detained by Joker, who has turned into Gotham’s left-wing populist mayor, for evading taxes.