• Ranvier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      From the article:

      Viana said he didn’t know what charges the demonstrators faced but that some will likely be charged with disturbing the peace and others with trespassing.

      They also were apparently reading some city anti camping ordinance to the protestors.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why does the lawyer not know what the charges are? How were they arrested without being charged?

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Because when it comes to dealing with those opposing the US MIC, we’re already a fascist country. You have the freedom to do many things but this is not one of them. MLK killed after speaking out on Vietnam, Kennedy killed for much the same reasons; Vietnam and mulling changes at the CIA, Boeing whistleblower mysteriously ‘comitting suicide’ your freedom only extends to things that do not oppose the military.

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            MLK wasn’t killed because he spoke out against Vietnam.

            He was killed because he was abandoning a racial paradigm in favor of a class one. He was building a rainbow coalition.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              Same with Malcolm X, and Fred Hampton. As soon as any of these men started talking about class unity, the people in charge immediately acted to get rid of them. Really shows how scary class consciousness is to the ruling class.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I get that, but I don’t know why this is even going before a judge if they were arrested without charge. I didn’t think that was legal.

        • Ranvier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          This source suggests something about a judge not being present for an arraignment, and so they were released with instructions to present again in May. Sounds like they probably haven’t been formally charged with anything. You can be arrested without being charged, usually charges come shortly after an arrest. But they can’t hold you indefinitely with no charge, which is why they were just released with instructions to return on a certain date.

          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/emerson-college-protest-arrests-divides-along-public-safety-vs-political-lines/ar-AA1nGB5t

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can be arrested without being charged, usually charges come after an arrest.

            Okay, I didn’t realize that. I thought they had to charge you with something if they arrested you. Thanks.

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can be arrested just because the cop felt like it. They typically have some time span in which to charge you or they have to let you go.

          Cops aren’t the ones charging you, that’s the DA.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, I was wondering if any more clarified information had come out.

        Another commenter let me know that Boston basically made suburban camping illegal last year in Boston.

      • WR5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Could you please cite in the article what the list of charges were? I see: “Viana said he didn’t know what charges the demonstrators faced but that some will likely be charged with disturbing the peace and others with trespassing”. Viana, in this context, being the lawyer representing the students arrested from the National Lawyers Guild. Additionally, there was mention of some city ordinances being violated, but no specifics.

          • WR5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think we are misunderstanding each other. Are you are confusing city ordinances with legal charges? And, if so, they don’t even call out the city ordinances that were all cited, just that there are ordinances about unlawful camping.

            The article doesn’t mention how many, which ones, and what charges can be levied against someone who violated those ordinances.

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I’m not confused. The article is pretty clear: they haven’t been charged yet (as of the article’s writing), and the lawyer was speculating on what they might be charged with. You even quoted the relevant part.

              • WR5@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I regret engaging with this believing you were trying to be constructive. This is now a closed loop in which, within 3 messages, you claim to know what the charges are, and then you admit the charges are still in speculation. Have a nice day.

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  The answer to your question was in the article, and you even quoted it yourself. If anyone engaged here in bad faith, it was you. You even proved it By quoting the answer when you asked the question.

                  If you stick your hand in a blender and it gets mutilated, you don’t blame the blender you blame yourself for sticking your hand in a blender.

                  If you believed something different was going to happen, that is 100% on you.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Time to consider stop paying taxes as a form of protest if you are arrested for protesting there’s really no other option. Unfortunately that will get in further trouble. We’re not free

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Are Americans starting to see all their “rights” are meaningless? You know a few you have on paper. The law has another to take it away EVERY SINGLE TIME. You are not free, you are one misguided DAs decision away from jail and destroying your life. Everything is criminal.