RIP. I hope the levels were backed up.

  • Moghul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t really expect a business to be forced to run a game in perpetuity, but at least they shouldn’t be allowed to C&D you from doing it if they aren’t.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      They would never have such expectation if they simply allowed players to host it to begin with. This used to be the norm, until companies figured out that it’s easier to control, monetize and force obsolescence to push players into a newer product if they are the only ones hosting servers.

      • Moghul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m a developer. It’s work to do anything, code doesn’t grow on the LLM tree yet. That’s a feature that would have to be implemented. Anything you ask the business to put effort in is a negative to the cause (and the cause is good), something for the businesses to latch onto to stop the law from changing.

        The best argument you can make is ‘let us figure it out, just don’t sue us’. Anything else you get is a blessing.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s work to do anything, but we routinely see small indie studios managing to release player-hosted games just fine, while large studios don’t bother. Even though it also costs them more to run all the servers on their own. So I’m not so sure it’s just a matter of saving costs.