ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means. | Voxwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1208arrow-down139cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1169arrow-down1external-linkThe WHO declared aspartame "possibly" causes cancer. Here’s what that means. | Voxwww.vox.comProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square97linkfedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.ml
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoBody odor doesn’t increase the likelihood of cancer for the people around you.
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·edit-21 year agoLet’s trade sources. Here are mine. Secondhand smoking may increase the overall risk of cancer for never smokers, particularly lung and breast cancer, and especially in women. Does secondhand smoke cause cancer? Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have all classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (a cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 7, 9) Twenty years after secondhand smoke was first classified as a cause of lung cancer in lifetime nonsmokers, the evidence supporting causation continues to mount (USDHHS 1986). Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent. Secondhand smoke is estimated to cause approximately 53,800 deaths annually in the United States. Exposure to tobacco smoke in the home is also a risk factor for asthma in children. Edit: I also did the work for you and checked some of the references in those sources. Here’s the 1986 landmark surgeon general report.
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoAll of these studies are extensively peer reviewed. What source do you have that proves they are unreliable? Let’s pretend that it’s true, what purpose is served by fabricating this data?
Removed by mod
Body odor doesn’t increase the likelihood of cancer for the people around you.
Removed by mod
Let’s trade sources. Here are mine.
Secondhand smoking may increase the overall risk of cancer for never smokers, particularly lung and breast cancer, and especially in women.
Does secondhand smoke cause cancer? Yes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Surgeon General, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have all classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen (a cancer-causing agent) (1, 3, 7, 9)
Twenty years after secondhand smoke was first classified as a cause of lung cancer in lifetime nonsmokers, the evidence supporting causation continues to mount (USDHHS 1986).
Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers increases lung cancer risk by about 20 percent. Secondhand smoke is estimated to cause approximately 53,800 deaths annually in the United States. Exposure to tobacco smoke in the home is also a risk factor for asthma in children.
Edit: I also did the work for you and checked some of the references in those sources. Here’s the 1986 landmark surgeon general report.
Removed by mod
All of these studies are extensively peer reviewed. What source do you have that proves they are unreliable? Let’s pretend that it’s true, what purpose is served by fabricating this data?