A frog who wants the objective truth about anything and everything.

Admin of SLRPNK.net

XMPP: prodigalfrog@slrpnk.net

Matrix: @prodigalfrog:matrix.org

  • 1.44K Posts
  • 1.79K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle







  • As a fellow user of Librewolf, I’ve also lamented that I can’t use the dark mint theme due to that setting. The alternative Alexandrite and Photon frontends we host have easy user-editable themes, though it can take some getting used to if you’re used to the standard lemmy-ui.

    Your comment prompted me to look into if there’s a workaround, and I found this, which describes how to disable the ResistFingerprinting setting, and instead modify the FingerprintingProtection setting in the about:config settings menu to replicate the functionality of ResistFingerprinting while still letting the user set the default page theme.

    When I compared the standard ResistFingerprinting setting vs the workaround with dark theme enabled in the user settings, it showed no difference in fingerprint score over on CoverMyTracks, so that could be a good temporary or permanent solution (extra bonus that it effects all websites)

    poVoq is also investigating the possibility of adding a dedicated dark theme option to slrpnk as well.

















  • I think the analogy holds up beautifully.

    The man proceeds to tell the booth talkers that he’s taken great pains to avoid seeing or hearing politics in his daily life, such as quickly muting political ads on TV, requesting his neighbors take down their Trump flags and local candidate election signs in their yard, and taking backroads to avoid seeing a political billboard on the way to work, all in the effort to spare their eyes the misfortune of sliding across disgusting politics. So it’s perfectly reasonable that he demand to the booth talkers they cease their discussion immediately, and switch to a topic he approves of, he explains, confident in the knowledge that they will understand the pains he’s gone through.

    The two people in the booth glance at each other uncomfortably, wondering what terrible fate brought this demanding and oddly entitled man to their booth. Finally, one of them flashes a half-grin and spreads their hands disarmingly “Hey man, I get it that you don’t like what we’re discussing, but if we give in to your request, wouldn’t that mean we’d have to give into any other request you have about topics? What if we were talking about sex amongst ourselves and that too wasn’t acceptable since you go to efforts to avoid that topic as well? I don’t think we want to live our lives beholden to your feelings on things, that’s for us to decide. Have a good day.”


  • Interesting, by your guidelines, there’s quite some limits on expressing oneself to appease people who can easily avoid and skip over a clearly labeled piece of content.

    From my perspective, it’s as though someone came into a tavern and, fresh ale in hand, overheard a political discussion happening in a corner booth. Perhaps the subject was particularly distasteful to this theoretical tavern goer, and instead of ignoring it or moving to a seat where they can’t hear it, they instead march up to said booth and demand these booth talkers cease their discussion immediately, explaining that they come to the tavern to relax, not have these political ideas pop up everywhere they go.

    I suspect the people in the booth would be quite bewildered as to why this theoretical person is going to such trouble to involve themselves in ceasing an activity they could so easily avoid.