Certain sexual assaults against a spouse will now be criminalized in West Virginia for the first time under a law signed Friday by Republican Gov. Jim Justice.

The law removes marriage as a defense to first- and third-degree sexual assault.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m sorry… why was marriage ever a defense to beat your spouse?

    I’m guessing Jesus or something.

    • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its more just lack of respect for women, this is big in nations with low social development

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but lack of respect for a particular class of people is rooted in religion, which creates in-groups and out-groups beyond “this is the person in charge and the rest of you aren’t in charge.”

    • golden_calf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is not about beating your wife. It’s more about rape or forced sex. There are actually lots of places that marriage is still a defense to say you are allowed to force your spouse to have sex since you’re married.

      Good for WV for removing that. I think a lot of women will still not know they have options.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think Jesus would have been cool with you raping your wife. The religion and the people operating it on the other hand

      • Spitzspot@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        1 Corinthians 4:7 The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          To be fair, those weren’t Jesus’ words, they were Paul’s. But as I said, Jesus hated divorce and women were not considered equal to men, so he might not have had much of a problem with it.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Considering the first “official” Catholic Bible was not assembled until over 300 years after his death, I’m going to say no.

              • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’ll follow this logic path. It was assembled 300 years after his death, but the Catholic Church claim(ed/s) to have God’s phone number through the Pope, so wouldn’t Jesus have been like “yo, pops, you gotta tell them to take out that rapey shit before I get me too’d”.

                Mystery of mysteries.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s rare that I see a state like West Virginia get one right, but I’ll give them all the credit they deserve when they do.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I had to read this three times to make sure I understood that west Virginia was not doing the regressive thing.