Stop me if you heard this one…
A youthful squire, with the aid of a knight errant, his trusty steed, and a powerful wizard, go to rescue the beautiful princess from the evil Black Knight and his fire breathing dragon.
Both Lucas and Herbert were plugged into fundamental cultural mythology:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hero_with_a_Thousand_Faces
And they did that very differently. Lucas played the archetypes straight while Herbert deconstructed them.
I was just talking about this, about how Paul is not a typical hero. Sure he’s the ‘chosen one of prophecy’, but only because of generations of genetic manipulation to create someone with his abilities and centuries of spreading superstition and prophecies. Even then his actions are only sort of heroic in that he helps free the Fremen but thus drives them into a holy war against the entire empire.
It’s a really cool way of leaning on existing tropes in a self-aware way.
Paul also bailed before things ran their course, leaving Leto to become supreme jabbs of the universe. He chose what he thought was the lesser ofany evils and was still stacked by the guilt from the choice. Not very common for heroes to just bail on their destiny.
It’s important to note that Dune was published in 1965, Star Wars premiered in 1977, and The Hero With a Thousand Faces was published in 1949 but the Hero’s Journey took a while to become a well known concept.
Lucas has an interview where he talks about going to a lecture by Campbell on the Journey as part of his college studies, while Campbell was observing these common tropes have existed as long as storytelling the idea of this formula existing was still relatively new.
I am so fucking tired of people acting like the Hero’s Journey actually says something important about stories or that Campbell isn’t a complete hack.
Well, it only provided the framework for multiple multi-billion dollar franchises and thousands of individual works of genre fiction…
Pre-Disney Star Wars has an objectively trash method of story telling and the plot is incredibly derivative. If you enjoy Star Wars I am not hating on you, I do too but if you think all this hero’s journey nonsense actually helped Star Wars or that George Lucas really helped Star Wars (versus his wife and others involved) you are sorely mistaken.
Further just because pop culture decided this was the formula stories had to adhere to doesn’t mean that formula is good it means pop culture decided this was the formula stories had to adhere to.
Feel free to write something better or at least more academically acknowledged, lol
Yes the common trope of a desert planet with a powerful worm-like guy that has a face and arms having spice orgies in a palace. That’s just a common trope that exists… well just in Return of the Jedi and in God Emperor of Dune which was coincidentally published just around the time RotJ was being written.
And the old saw of someone having a vision of their lover dying during childbirth, trying to prevent it, getting an offer by an evil cloner dude to bring her back to life, and it ends up happening anyway, and surprise… it’s twins! That kind of stuff is all over mythology, right?
Hey I love Star Wars too, but come on, Lucas burrowed very heavily from Dune.
Herbert admitted he ripped off Lawrence of Arabia so throwing stone in glass houses.
Why did he think that? Also, why have no one mentioned Valérian and Laureline? It is much easier to argue was more than just a little inspiration?
The comic was published in 1967, ten years before star wars.
I remember seeing more side by side comparison somewhere, and the list of passing coincidences was very long. I think it was this one
Thank you for mentioning Valerian et Laureline!
deleted by creator
And I dont get why Avatar from Cameron was not sued.
in 1979 Herbert and Ranson wrote "The Jesus Incident ":
A planet named Pandora habited by violent various beasts
The human survive in a Colony and cant barrely go out, because of the wild life.
The whole planet is covered by an entity protecting the planet it is named: AVATA. who comunicate with blinking light.
There is a scene, where one of the main human run around the human camp folded by many monster.
To survive on the planet, the human created special Clone with better reflex.
The Clone were badly treated and rebelled against the Colony
And Arrival by Villeneuve (or the book it pretend to be from) Is bit for bit from the novella :“Try to remember” From Herbert.
Aliens try to communicate to humanity.
Some woman manage to do understand their language.
But some military try to smugle a bomb in the alien ship.
The book it pretended to be from is the short story “Story of your life” by Ted Chiang which seems to be a bit different from “Try to remember”:
-
Aliens arrive
-
Woman learns their language and it completely changes her perception of time which makes her tell her daughter her(the daughter’s) whole life’s story on the day of her birth (Hence the title)
-
Aliens leave at some point and nobody knows why
what make me think that "Try to remember " was used, is the “bomb attack”… it make no sense in the movie, and it also sound a bit dumb in Herbert novel. And of course, beside the time travel twist, every thing play the same
-
Deathworld by Harry Harrison pre-dates all that:
very interresting. This might be why Avatar was so fast forgotten, it is just a mix of more interresting stories
I don’t remember a Death Star or a princess to save in Dune. Or robots.
Those three elements were taken from Akira Kurosawa’s The Hidden Fortress. There weren’t robots, but there were two characters who serve the same function, often as comic relief in the background, but also coming through in some heroic way when it counts.
I don’t think it’s a rip-off either, but the Dune franchise does actually involve some princesses and robots
Yes, but not a damsel in distress. A trope that has a name from the other stories.
Star wars uses old tropes. Dune uses old tropes. The key is they both did it on ways that tell a story that lots of people found interesting or entertaining.
Which Dune book had robots? I thought that robots had been banned in the Dune universe.
Well, the Butlerian Jihad was a big influence obviously, and later in the series they end up fighting some leftover AIs from that era. But yeah, a very different take on robots between the two
Weren’t the Dune books mentioning these events published after Star Wars premiered?
Yeah, and wasn’t even written by Frank.
And also fucking suck. the story is bad and the writing is downright young adult dystopia novel in quality.
It’s not, it’s a rip off of Lord of the Rings.
Also, Harry Potter is a rip off of Star Wars, which is a rip off of Lord of the Rings.
sigh. Artistic works are often derivative. Even the music of Star Wars takes after Holst’s Planets, but it’s far from a copy.
The themes of the two go completely different directions. Star Wars is a fairly simple story of good and evil, while Dune dives deeper into politics and personality cults.
Hell, I’ll even defend Cameron’s Avatar from accusations of being derivative. You might find a list showing how it’s exactly like ten other works of fiction. So, why aren’t we citing those ten works as being derivative of each other? Yeah, the movie isn’t that good beyond spectacle, but even spectacle adds something that those previous works did not have.
to be fair, the main problem with avatar being a retelling of pocahontas isn’t the stealing aspect, but the fact they brought nothing to the table. It just felt stale.
Are you guys talking about Dances with Smurfs?
Probably because when you see a Cameron make billions out of his name and advertising for a story he ripped off, it is hard to cast aside all the influence he used that didnt get the same money/recognition
Because it had a desert planet with a giant worm for like 10 minutes?
It’s crazy that Herbert would see a skeleton of a giant reptile in a desert and see it as a worm.
Star wars was always just a world war II movie rip off.
To be fair World War II was kind of a World War I rip off.
A lot of the side character archetypes/interactions are stolen from Hidden Fortress too. Like the two drunks becoming the bickering droids.
Storytelling is reimagining the basic archetypal stories over and over again for centuries. It’s important to make the stories relevant and new for every generation. There’s no point in arguing who came with a motive first.
My son was really into Star Wars when he was a kid but was over it by the time I dragged him to see Dune. On the ride home all he had to say was that it just seemed like a big Star Wars rip off :)
Maybe… But at least Star Wars isn’t giving the catholic church a blowie.
If that’s your interpretation, he didn’t do a good job of writing.
“He felt that religion was forced down his throat, and his world of Dune was one of the ways he dealt with his childhood.”
I haven’t gotten to Heretics yet, but that line referencing 3PO is funny.
deleted by creator
Some other parallels I haven’t seen mentioned could be the revelation that the Baron is Jessica’s biological father, Chani dying while giving birth to twins, Alia being Paul’s secret sister.
Star Wars being a rip-off is a bit harsh and undeserved but I’d definitely say there was influence from Dune.
Luke and Leia being siblings only happened because Lucas scrapped his sequel trilogy idea after Empire and wanted to resolve that plot in Jedi. Them being twins only happened by narrative necessity when writing RotS.
As if Herbert didn’t rip off half his ideas from Heinlein.
Wow you don’t understand Herbert or Heinlein.
If Heinlein wrote Dune, Paul would’ve been a real savior and also wouldn’t have hesitated to use the family atomics by the morning of the night Leto died.
Just because Herbet ripped off Heinlein’s ideas doesn’t mean he used the same format or character work. You’re taking me to mean “Herbert copied Heinlein in every respect” which I didn’t say.
Heinlein was writing about meta humans with psychic based abilities for decades before Herbert wrote about the KH in Dune. Clairvoyance and neutron dampening/excitement, eidetic memory, inherent mathematical ability (mentats, anyone?), control over human physiology, twins having quantum mental bonds which work outside of light speed limitations, the ABILITY TO ASTROGATE AND LITERALLY CAUSE MATTER/ANTIMATTER REACTORS TO FUNCTION WITH YOUR MIND.
Pretty much all of Herbert’s ideas about human evolution and the people that make society possible without thinking machines were based in Heinlein’s prior novels and short stories.
Heinlein, inventor of the concept of being good at math.
All of those concepts predate Heinlein. You credit him with things Victorians were fantasizing about. The Oracles might take issue with your claims on clairvoyance, and and in some tellings of Ajax, Teucer only shows up to help because he has a premonition of his brother’s peril. That’s from 500BC.
I don’t think that’s entirely fair, because Heinlein didn’t invent those ideas either. There’s a whole library of pulp sci-fi out there that he stole from, not just one person!
It’s honestly why I don’t care for Dune, he drops these pseudo-technical terms with no context for a reader because his context was a Flash Gordon or whatever comic he read and he just assumes the reader did too, and if they didn’t it was 1965 so every book came with a glossary in the back that said things like Personal Shield: A personal shield
Like, yeah, that’s great writing, making the reader stop to look something up in the fuckin glossary that still doesn’t explain anything.
Well sure, but that specific focus I believe was pioneered by Heinlein in the same way that when you think of Asimov you think “AI and the three laws of robotics.” Along with his obsession with free love meta human abilties were his biggest returning concept.
Heinlein’s biggest returning concept is that he is completely inconsistent ideologically and based his opinions on whoever he was married to at the time.
He took his big ideas early on from HG Wells, and later Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman.
The man began his career as an anti-war leftist barred from Naval service, and ended it writing fiction about how we’d all be better off if Nuclear Testing were still allowed.
He praised Rand, said both political parties had moved too far left, and lived his entire life on disability checks provided by tax-payers.
Heinlein was a turd of a man. His literature is so maleable and devoid of obvious truth that anyone can claim he supports their politcal views.
Even Asmiov turned against him in the end.
It’s almost like an author can write about different societies and not just one that they specifically agree with, but I guess that makes them “ideologically inconsistent.”
Furthermore, although a flaming liberal during the war, Heinlein became a rock-ribbed far right conservative immediately afterward. This happened at just the time he changed wives from a liberal woman, Leslyn, to a rock-ribbed far-right conservative woman, Virginia.
He always pictured himself a libertarian, which to my way of thinking means “I want the liberty to grow rich and you can have the liberty to starve”. It’s easy to believe that no one should depend on society for help when you yourself happen not to need such help.
- Isaac Asimov
That you could read The Space Cadet and Starship Troopers and think they have a consistent message is disheartening to say the least.
His later work was a serious rendition of everything his earlier work mocked.
If Heinlein wrote Dune
Then that same argument works for Lucas copying Dune. If Herbert wrote Star Wars, Luke would have taken the title of Duke of the Sith and then negotiated with the Emperor to marry the Emperor’s daughter to secure his power.
Lucas’s writing was pulp sci-fi with bad dialog fixed by others. But anyone picking out Dune Easter Eggs from StarWars to claim it’s a copy of Dune is crazy. Herbert should have reserved his bitterness for the public who picked StarWars over Dune. Herbert was like a classical music composer angry at the Beatles.
I thought it was a Flash Gordon ripoff?
