• WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Treating someone equally is to give them equal value and respect as you’d give anyone else, it’s to not devalue them based on gender, race, etc. It’s the same as it’s been since Dr. King talked about the content of someone’s character instead of the color of their skin.

      • wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        sure, no one is denying that. I was just jumping in on specifics of how that would look like, for example, when giving certain items.

      • wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’s what I meant. You wouldn’t give them to whoever not needed them. I called them man, you called them people without uterus. In other words, you don’t want to treat all equally.

          • wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            there’s no equivalence here.

            So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don’t say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus?

            But would you? If you do not, wouldn’t that make you treat people unequally, in some sense?