• TheFlopster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Nance’s prior arrest records indicated that he was previously arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon involving a woman.

    It needs to be specified if you discharge your weapon and a woman is involved? Because that’s…a different charge than if a man is involved? What if it’s a woman discharging the weapon? Still phrased like this? What a weird thing to write.

    • eatthecake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      No. They are saying that he was previoualy arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon and that the aforementioned incident involved a woman.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would you have been happier if it had said, “Nance’s prior arrest records indicated that he was previously arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon involving a person?” Because that sounds awkward to me.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Aggravated discharge implies involving another person so that wouldn’t be said. It feels like something is being hinted at - likely domestic violence - without being explicitly said for some reason. I think that’s the weirdness being commented on. If it was domestic violence why not say that? But if not that what is being hinted at?

        It’s probably overthinking, but this is the internet.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because shooting a gun in your front yard at nobody in particular because you’re a crazy fucker is different than firing a gun in a way as to threaten a person or persons.

    • maness300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They probably would have specified if it was a man, too.

      You’re making up things to be upset about.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nice of you to notice the subtitles of the American justice system. This is actually a much harsher crime than just leaving the gender undefined.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    JOLIET, Ill. (CBS) – Eight people were found shot and killed in three different locations over two days in Joliet, and the suspect in the slayings was also found dead by a suspected suicide 1,200 miles away Monday night, police said.

    The apparent self-inflicted gunshot death of 23-year-old Romeo Nance in Texas followed a manhunt by multiple law enforcement agencies.

    Yikes.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Eight people were found shot and killed in three different locations over two days in Joliet, and the suspect in the slayings was also found dead by a suspected suicide 1,200 miles away Monday night, police said.

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          edit2: fixed wording a bit, added Texas

          Not sure, but I tried to point out, with the quote, that he was not unalived by someone else; suspect was unalived by themself.

          Texas pride? Is a guess.