• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    My point is that it’s not a good illustration.

    Just read through some of the responses I’ve gotten. Some people think it’s a good illustration because it’s very plausible. Some because it’s not at all plausible.

    I’m saying it’s not a good illustration because it’s not at all plausible.

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Other than all the conservative efforts to destroy the ADA I guess.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think it makes much difference whether or not it is plausible. It’s just trying to communicate a message. I guess it has to be plausible enough that a reader can understand what it is even talking about; but not so plausible that the reader is led to believe this specific case is actually happening.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just one more interpretation to add to the ones I mentioned.

        Which is fundamentally my point. Had the OP used something that is actually happening then it would be harder to interpret the message in unintended ways. And it would be much more readily accepted by Americans like myself who do not see themselves as evil, stupid, malicious, or any of the other insults that necessarily follow from any interpretation the OP.