Rofl those were examples. It’s obviously very difficult to tell exactly what they’re producing but they definitely work in manufacturing producing goods that come to the West.
I will give you one. Just one. If after this you demand further citations, specificity, or detailed description, I will denounce you as a sealioning troll and banish you.
Third paragraph:
“The Special Rapporteur regards it as reasonable to conclude that forced labour among Uighur, Kazakh and other ethnic minorities in sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing has been occurring in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region of China,” the report said.
had to look up sea-lioning, don’t think this applies since you didn’t actually provide past evidence nor am i pretending to have an honest, civil debate. I think you are someone who has heard a lot of different things, probably with the right intention, and have conflated them into one mass as if half the world’s population were not involved. so I’ve been asking you to pull apart that tangled ball of thread and see if you can’t find a kernel of truth.
in this case, you may have. after all, “is reasonable to conclude…” and “this slave is manufacturing the shit you bought at Target” are roughly the same, right?
No, of course they are not. But while I’d hoped you had the rigor to actually come up with a coherent argument, you seem not to have. I’ll save you a click and block you.
United Nations: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-18/xinjiang-forced-labour-china-un-slavery-expert/101347992
yes, we know about this
what are they being forced to produce? you claimed iphones and leggings? back that up.
Rofl those were examples. It’s obviously very difficult to tell exactly what they’re producing but they definitely work in manufacturing producing goods that come to the West.
and you’re backing this up with…
See previous UN report
i did, didn’t see what you are claiming.
whats the section/paragraph number that backs up your claims?
I will give you one. Just one. If after this you demand further citations, specificity, or detailed description, I will denounce you as a sealioning troll and banish you.
Third paragraph:
had to look up sea-lioning, don’t think this applies since you didn’t actually provide past evidence nor am i pretending to have an honest, civil debate. I think you are someone who has heard a lot of different things, probably with the right intention, and have conflated them into one mass as if half the world’s population were not involved. so I’ve been asking you to pull apart that tangled ball of thread and see if you can’t find a kernel of truth.
in this case, you may have. after all, “is reasonable to conclude…” and “this slave is manufacturing the shit you bought at Target” are roughly the same, right?
No, of course they are not. But while I’d hoped you had the rigor to actually come up with a coherent argument, you seem not to have. I’ll save you a click and block you.
You must be a tankie, only a CCP bootlicker could come up with the mental gymnastics to say “there are slaves” means “there are not slaves”.