• Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    They have published new versions over the years. They’re on version 5 by now. Plenty of things have changed.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      The argument is that you shouldn’t base your position of acceptance on whatever the DSM says because they’re demonstrably very fallible, but rather you should use your own arguments instead.

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        The DSM is fallible. Many of the diagnostic criteria will change in future versions of the DSM. In the future we are going to learn that some aspects of the current manuals are wrong, just as we have for previous ones.

        But the people who will find those errors and make those updates will be, and have been, researchers and mental health experts who work in the field and have relevant experience. There’s no way that I, as some rando on the internet will have anything insightful to say on the subject. If either of us come to a conclusion that contradicts the DSM, it’s far more likely to be we are mistaken in our uninformed opinions.

        Regardless, the DSM-5-tr is the manual that is CURRENTLY used by mental health professionals to diagnose mental disorders. My description of the DSM criteria is as accurate as is practical for a single sentence sarcastic comment in response to a meme.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It is possible to accept people, use preferred pronouns and names etc. while also being of the opinion of “technically you’re not trans but enby” or something. Some people just have a fetish for precisely defined taxonomies, don’t kink-shame.