return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 个月前The rich now own a record share of stocks, about 93% of U.S. households' stock market wealth is held by the top 10%www.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1629arrow-down116cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foonews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1613arrow-down1external-linkThe rich now own a record share of stocks, about 93% of U.S. households' stock market wealth is held by the top 10%www.axios.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 个月前message-square109fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foonews@lemmy.world
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-211 个月前Maybe. In that case, I think the “first home” should be exempt only if its your only home. If you have more than one, then I see no reason not to tax them. I’m sure it would create a lot of loopholes that would also need to be plugged up.
minus-squareNuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 个月前Ah. Ambiguity fart. Let me rephrase that to "one home per “household”.
Maybe. In that case, I think the “first home” should be exempt only if its your only home. If you have more than one, then I see no reason not to tax them. I’m sure it would create a lot of loopholes that would also need to be plugged up.
Ah. Ambiguity fart.
Let me rephrase that to "one home per “household”.