For years, conservative billionaires have treated Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas to opulent vacations and trips on their private jets. If these were anything other than disinterested gifts, then they’re taxable — and Thomas owes the IRS a huge bill.
  • MrZee@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    9 months ago

    By my read, this is the core of the articles argument:

    But if these billionaires’ largesse was designed to retain the conservative judge on the country’s highest court, the donations might fall outside of the definition of tax-free gifts, which according to the Supreme Court must stem from “detached and disinterested generosity.” If the benefits showered on Thomas were designed to elicit court actions or job decisions, they could be considered taxable income, whether or not there is definitive proof of quid pro quo on Thomas’s part.

  • vivadanang@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    9 months ago

    The IRS comes in to save democracy in the US? I did not have that on my bingo card.

    • ruleman@feddit.nl
      0·
      9 months ago

      If the public reacts defeated, nothing will happen. If there is public outrage, there is a political cost and change might actually happen.

      You are the public, your defeatism is self fulfilling.

      So please try another comment, this one (even though you don’t want it to) supports abuse of power.