111000@reddthat.comM to Memes @ Reddthat@reddthat.com · 9 months agoWhat is .webp exactlyreddthat.comimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down10
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageWhat is .webp exactlyreddthat.com111000@reddthat.comM to Memes @ Reddthat@reddthat.com · 9 months agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoYes. (Ok there might be a lossy mode but that is barely better than jpg via mozjpeg)
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 months agoTechnically yes by 26%. https://developers.google.com/speed/webp
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·9 months ago26% smaller at the exact same quality is better.
minus-squareIamRoot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·9 months agoNot if people can’t view or save them. PNG and JPEG are superior.
minus-squareIamRoot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoWhat do you think the meme OP posted means?
minus-squarenonailsleft@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoThat’s what she said!! Hahaha amirite guys
Yes.
(Ok there might be a lossy mode but that is barely better than jpg via mozjpeg)
Still no.
Technically yes by 26%.
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp
Smaller is not better.
26% smaller at the exact same quality is better.
Not if people can’t view or save them. PNG and JPEG are superior.
Seems like a skill issue.
What do you think the meme OP posted means?
That’s what she said!! Hahaha amirite guys