111000@reddthat.comM to Memes @ Reddthat@reddthat.com · 2 years agoWhat is .webp exactlyreddthat.comimagemessage-square93linkfedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down10
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageWhat is .webp exactlyreddthat.com111000@reddthat.comM to Memes @ Reddthat@reddthat.com · 2 years agomessage-square93linkfedilink
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoYes. (Ok there might be a lossy mode but that is barely better than jpg via mozjpeg)
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoTechnically yes by 26%. https://developers.google.com/speed/webp
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·2 years ago26% smaller at the exact same quality is better.
minus-squareIamRoot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoNot if people can’t view or save them. PNG and JPEG are superior.
minus-squareIamRoot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoWhat do you think the meme OP posted means?
minus-squarenonailsleft@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThat’s what she said!! Hahaha amirite guys
Yes.
(Ok there might be a lossy mode but that is barely better than jpg via mozjpeg)
Still no.
Technically yes by 26%.
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp
Smaller is not better.
26% smaller at the exact same quality is better.
Not if people can’t view or save them. PNG and JPEG are superior.
Seems like a skill issue.
What do you think the meme OP posted means?
That’s what she said!! Hahaha amirite guys