• schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    11 months ago

    Dang, stores better get rid of their loss leaders than.

    Sometimes you gotta take a small loss for the overall benefit of the company/system.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      How is remaining in an unprofitable market a “loss leader”?

      Sometimes you gotta take a small loss for the overall benefit of the company/system.

      You really don’t think Twitch did some analysis on this matter before making a decision? Or do you just figure that your uninformed assumptions about their financials are more accurate than their internal analysis? Clearly whatever benefit they were or were not getting from their SK business was not enough to justify the operating costs.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        11 months ago

        Negative press costs money too. There will be unforeseen costs related to this move.

        • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          What negative press? They’re no longer going to do business in a particular market for completely normal reasons. This isn’t some kind of scandal, it’s a standard decision for a company to make regarding unprofitable operations. Everyone besides you seems to understand this.

          You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Loss leaders you know lead to something. Can’t see what it would lead to.

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Neither does the person you’re replying to. They probably just learned the term “loss leader” and thought they’d sound smart bringing it up but have no idea how the concept actually works in practice.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gaming nerds dictating how business should operate is one of the funniest things to observe.

        • cerement@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago
          • “corporation” + “bribery” “lobbying” … nope, never seen that before …
          • “corporation” + “breaking the law” … nor that one either …
          • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Correct, but those are both expensive in their own ways.

            If they don’t see a return they won’t do either.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Which would cost you more in the end, so if removing it costs more, you keep it in.

        That’s what’s a loss leader is……