“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course it can and will. But just like Weimar Germany, the centrist parties (or in this case, the only non-fascist party) are too busy with their heads up their asses (or scare mongering about socialism) instead of solving people’s issues. Why would they support the party that will punish the few representatives they have any time they stand up for Muslim issues?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The alternative in this case being “treating people like you need their votes.”

        The party would rather have Trump than the nightmare scenario of acting like their voters are worth anything.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, I can’t keep people from hurting themselves. I will call them morons leading up to and afterwards though.

          Same as I did for dipshits in red states losing maternity wards now. /shrug

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m simply reminding people of the reality that either the Dem or Rep will win.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you need a group of people to vote for you, you need to get their votes.

                If you have a scapegoat to blame for any loss, you don’t need to do anything to get anyone’s votes. You’d rather have the scapegoat.

                • capital@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That has nothing to do with what I said.

                  You are desperate to say anything except admit I’m right about that simple fact.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The choice is between Biden and Trump, yes. One of them will win, assuming neither dies of old age before then. I never argued otherwise and don’t intend to start.

                    Now that I said the thing that you want, how has that changed the situation? Has that suddenly made this group more likely to vote for Biden?

                    You get to pretend you won an argument against someone who wasn’t arguing against the non-point you kept spamming. Congratulations. It’s not me you need to convince. I’m already voting for Biden.

                    If you need their votes, you need to secure their votes.