• lwuy9v5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would’ve never gotten that! I started getting lost trying to think about the differences in circumferences and radii before they mentioned the right or wrong answers

    • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      My only intuition was this: if you take two identical coins and rotate them together (like a pair of gears), it takes one rotation each to reach the starting point. If you now rotate your head along with one of the coins, it will appear standing still, while the other one will be rotating twice as fast.

      I still would have guessed the answer was 6, though. It took me awhile to figure out how extrapolate this model to a 3:1 ratio. As it turns out, it still works, and you get 4, but evidence of that was far from obvious to me.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      I probably would have gotten four because I would have visually saw the answer without knowing the equation.