• PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the moral of every tech company. FFS, learn and keep the greeds out.

    I do think the clock is ticking, though. The deterioration of Google’s culture will eventually become irreversible, because the kinds of people whom you need to act as moral compass are the same kinds of people who don’t join an organisation without a moral compass.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      183
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And then don’t ever, ever go public. Once you go public all the greedy people will insist that you install more greedy people.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s less about going public and moreso about the people that have the ability to get to the head of that line via funds.

        Why should Joe Shmoe who’s family fortune is based off mafia and cartel funds get to have say in your company? Just because of the money?

        I don’t get it. I’m probably naive to facets of this process - open to hearing/learning more from more informed people

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good, healthy, properly running companies that don’t owe their existence to a lot of external forces don’t go public.

          Going public only pays off the stakeholders in the company, like venture capitalists or employees that were under salaried and offered stock as a bonus.

      • MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once you accept venture capital, you’re pretty much down the path to going public, because the investors have an expectation of realizing their gains if the company is successful.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      with every tech company

      Clearly the problem here is unbridled capitalism, so why are you crying about tech companies specifically?? Nothing you highlighted has anything to do with tech but instead company culture in general

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not wrong, but why not add onto it instead of being so aggressive. Tech companies do seem especially bad, but that’s probably because I live in Seattle.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. With respect to network effects, culture bifurcates and can do so quickly. Good eggs bring in good eggs, bad (and dangerously, mediocre) bring in bad.