• DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Getting rid of parking spaces just creates frustration among commuters unless you provide real practical alternatives to driving — dedicated bike lanes; proper public transport that has enough seats, runs frequently and on time, and arrives close to where people are going; and/or formal car pooling.

    Bicycles aren’t practical for everyone. Public transport that requires passengers to stand for 20 minutes or more while crammed in like sardines; or public transport that runs every half-hour or more, isn’t useful — it actually discourages use of public transport. The only car pooling that I’ve seen work is when it’s organised within large companies so that people are going to the same destination and have something in common to talk about on the ride.

    Waving a magic wand and canceling car parks is most definitely not useful unless proper alternatives are available.

    Edit: Also, the plural of “minimum” is “minima“.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but at minimum, it may be good to get rid of mandatory parking minimums and the prioritization of good parking next to mass transit.

      It doesn’t have to be a lot of pain, but a little can help.

    • TeaHands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I despise car-reliant infrastructure as much as anyone but yeah, this has to be approached from all sides you can’t just punish people who use cars due to there being no alternative, and then STILL give them no alternative.

      That said, the article implies that this is in fact part of a larger plan and just removes one blocker, so I guess we’ll see if that ends up being true or not.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, don’t buy into the strawman. At no point did anyone say “let’s not do anything else”. Removing the parking minimum tax enables the rest of it.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh the Urbanity had a great video on how a large portion of non-commuting trips can be made by bicycle.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I work 20+ miles from where I live due to what I can afford. I’m not biking that lol I’d consider taking a train if I could take the bike to the train and from the train station to work. But I’d still be biking on busy roads not safe for bikers

        • htrayl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Part of why you have to live so far is because parking minimums create vast amounts of space that sits empty 90% of the time.

          The other part is because of stringent zoning regulations that kill real housing options.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends quite a lot o the climate and time. If your in a place where ice and heat stroke aren’t common, and have a shower at work, and don’t have to travel at night, and don’t have to deal with sharing the road with fifty mile an hour traffic, and can afford to spend the extra hour or so a day, and can find a place to stash your bike where it won’t be stolen immediately, etc…

        Bicycles require a lot of infrastructure and time, as well as an amenable climate. As much as i would like for the vast majority of humanity to be able commute every day by bike, the infrastructure simply isn’t there even in the places where you don’t have harsh winters. The goal of all transit, be it bike metro bus or car, is to get people from point A to B in the most effective way practical.

        Build the infrastructure, and they will come. If they don’t, then figure out what you did wrong with the infrastructure.

      • soloner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not when the weather is shit. You’re not gonna get humanity to get up for a bike ride and have to take a shower on arrival just to go get groceries, for example.

        There are a lot of different things that impact this, not just weather. The point isn’t about not picking one thing but to recognize it’s not feasible for everyone, full stop.

        • htrayl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People do this all the time in communities that emphasize biking. Easily. And actually, it isn’t that difficult to do.

          Further, driving isn’t feasible for everyone, but driving is emphasized in such a way that alternatives cannot thrive.

          See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhx-26GfCBU

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If there was really solid bike infrastructure, I think covered electric tricycles capable of towing small capsule trailers could fill that gap fairly well. Something like this or this.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Getting rid of parking spaces just creates frustration among commuters unless you provide real practical alternatives to driving

      Good. Let them be frustrated, because that’s how you get public support for real practical alternatives to driving!

      Quit bending over backwards to accommodate cars FIRST and the good urbanism will follow.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      nothing can be done, so let’s just stick our heads in the sand and wail.

      oh wait, no, human behavior and values change over time. so we can use that to our advantage by not enabling selfish fucks who refuse to change with the times. No one’s expecting metro service to rural households, but also, it’s insane to expect your right to your own single person transport while the world is on freaking fire.

      so you do you bud, but understand the rest of society is going to change and you can fight it, but it won’t make you right.

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Adjusting parking minimums and reducing parking over time is absolutely the way to promote alternatives. It promotes higher better access to services (as land can be used for alternatives) and cheaper housing (meaning you can live closer to where you work).

      The reality is we are vastly overparked. Depending on where you live, there can be 8 TIMES the number of parking spaces than cars. You can pretty easily reduce parking by 1/3 and have near zero impact for drivers 99% of the time (maybe on black Friday you may need to take a ride).

      Also, just want to point out to the conservatives and libertarians in the crowd: Parking Minimums are a TAX. Worse, they are a tax that overly affects small business that is less likely to be able to get the support they need endure the taxes effect on their finances.

  • pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because there’s already so much parking available, right?

    When I’m driving my mobility impaired grandma to her eye surgery, I want a parking space. Driving in major cities is already enough frustration, no need to add more.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there’s already so much parking available, right?

      Yes, there literally is. Very often, parking minimums are set to accommodate peak parking demand and parking lots sit >50% empty 99% of the time.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s definitely true of the US and Canada, and very likely Australia and New Zealand too. Maybe it’s not so excessive in the UK or Ireland, but still, most of the English-speaking countries have been infected by 1950s USA’s misguided influence.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m definitely with you on that.

        Fewer parking spots is not a solution on its own… It’s a natural consequence of good public transportation network. No one really enjoys to spend hours on traffic to go anywhere.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        How are senior citizens with mobility difficulties an outlier? Are senior citizens in your country a minority or are they all joggers?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He’s saying she should have a tag that hangs on the rear view mirror that can be put on your car when you drive her around (as opposed to a handicap license plate that can only be used with her car).

          • pathief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In my country only the car owner can apply for a disability permit. I’m the car owner, she doesn’t even have a driver’s license.

            • qantravon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              May I ask what country? Yes, the person who needs the placard applies for it, but in most places that can go on whatever car they ride in, so long as they’re actually in the car.

          • pathief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure how it works in your country, maybe it’s different. Here you car needs to have a visible disability permit or you’ll get fined. Only the car owner can apply for the permit. I’m the car owner.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              My country allows for a placard that can move between cars as long as the handicapped person is there to provide identification if asked by the police.

    • AEMarling@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I caregive as well. What we truly need are five-minute cities and things like tricycle taxies that I can safely take anywhere.

    • haagch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if health insurance paid for necessary taxi rides? Not every mobility impaired grandma is lucky enough to have family members to be their personal chauffeurs.

    • Jesse@aus.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @pathief @ProdigalFrog it’s just physically not possible to build enough parking for everyone to always have a park. You have trouble finding a park because that’s just the physical reality. Adding more parking (like adding more lanes) doesn’t increase availability because of induced demand and the inherent inefficiency of cars.

      Reducing parking won’t reduce the parking available to you. Just as reducing the number of car lanes won’t reduce your ability to drive places.