• tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rather disappointing.

    I’d be in favor of a law requiring the labeling of such products, but this seems to overreach; especially when applied to animal feed.

  • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The proposal [prohibits] the use, sale, import and export of food and feed “from cell cultures or tissue derived from vertebrate animals”.

    Am I missing something, is it a translation issue, or did they just ban meat?

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what you could argue, yes.

      Since you can’t get any “tissue” without deriving it from an animal.

      Which would be the funnier solution… Well if you scientists and farmers can’t get along, nobody gets meat! Good news everyone! You’re all vegetarians now!

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a translation issue. “Derivanti” in Italian is translated as “derived”, but the Italian word implies a new type of tissue and the English word does not.

        • bmsok@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Downvote if you want but at least educate me on why I’m wrong on facepalming. I’m serious. I love a good discussion.

          • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think people are downvoting because a simple facepalm emoji is considered a low effort comment. If there’s no substance to your comment, better not to comment at all.

            • bmsok@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair point. My intent was to encourage discussion and it was my mistake that an emoji would facilitate more discussion. Lesson learned 🤦🏻‍♂️

            • bmsok@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay. My point is that methane (from cow farts) is a significant source of greenhouse gasses. If we can get high quality food without ruining the planet or the enjoyment of food then why shouldn’t we go for it?

      • rhizophonic@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’ve been evolving with the times for quite a while. Maybe change for the sake of change isn’t exactly the right thing either.

        Lab grown food, sold to you by the same system who sold you intensive farming.

        • wkk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is lab grown meat change for the sake of change? There’s obvious benefits to it: no more need to breed beings just to eat them, less resource-intensive, frees up land, and I might be missing others

          • rhizophonic@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it really sustainable ? I’m just not sure it’s a viable alternative to eating less meat and farming with sustainable and regenerative practices.