• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There were two possible definitions to go by: income or net worth. Look how low the net worth figure is (especially the one from the Credit Suisse study).

      Keep in mind that even a $1M net worth – more than either the Credit Suisse or World Inequality Report measure – is considered on the low side in terms of retirement savings by age 65. (At a 4% safe withdrawal rate, it only gets you $40k/year to live on.)

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Page 25 has a breakdown of median wealth. For the US it is $93,271, however for Western Europe it is higher then that to be fair.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A $122,100/year

      The person you’re reacting to mentions net worth. Owning a total of 138k is like a quarter of a house here

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of people have debt on their home, if they own it. There are also a lot of Americans among the people with the lowest net worth in the world. That is mainly student debt and they do not live bad lifes, but the thing is that median net worth of adults in the US is still $93,271 according to the same study. So litterally half of Americans are not part of the global 10% in terms of net worth either.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          litterally half of Americans are not part of the global 10% in terms of net worth either.

          You do realize that saying “Somewhat over half aren’t”, means that a very large number of people ARE, right?