• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Wtf is wrong with people. The initial Hamas attack was bad. But Israel is now basically bulldozing Gaza and trying to turn it into a pule of rubble.

    In what world does that make sense? They don’t need U.S. aid or anybody else’s help doing that. We should be internationally condemning what they’re doing right now. Instead we are offering to give them money?

    Am I crazy for thinking this is far far beyond a sane response. They have literally been killing children.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      This isn’t a response, it’s what they wanted to do for over half a century now. Killing Palestine or shoving it to nearby countries was always the plan, Israel was just waiting for an excuse.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s a mistake to pretend like this has been a monolithic response for Israel. It’s a little telling when people pretend like every action by the current government is and represents all of Israel for the last 50 years. This is the actions of an extreme radically right government. Netanyahu and his far right extremist allies have set this up and very likely been behind part of the entire debacle. For this reason as you suggest. However we should not pretend like his radicals have been running the entire country for its entire history. Anyone paying attention should know that these religious radicals have been at war with their own country just as much as the palestinians.

        • UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t really make sense to characterize a prime minster that is entering his (approximately) 16th year in office as being some kind of aberration. If the US elected Trump for four non-consecutive terms as president, I think would be fair to characterize the US right wing as being the norm rather than an aberration. How many times does Israel have to put a fascist in charge before they get a share of the blame for what he does in office?

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            His current government is an aberration though. His latest coalition isn’t the same one as in past years. It’s far more radical. Ignoring that is beyond dangerous to the entire situation.

            • UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You have pivoted your argument from “this government isn’t actually representative of the will of the Israeli people” to “its dangerous to ignore how much more fascist this democratically elected leadership is than the past governments, which were literally made up of the same people.” No shit, this government is dangerous, no one is arguing against that. It is ALSO the government that the people of Israeli have chosen, over and over and over again. Israel is a fascist right wing nation because they have chosen to be that.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What about all rubble in the West Bank? The settlements for more foreigners? The harassment everyday; especially in Jerusalem? This isn’t just the last 50 years, it’s been over 70…

      • Elderos@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They needed a good casus belli, this is as good as it is gonna get for them PR-wise.

        Truth is virtually no country ever denounce shit if they have something to lose doing so. Geopolitics is rooted in each nation self-interest.

        On top of that, Palestinians just hasn’t been good neighbors and no country on earth want to bring the kind of chaos of taking them as refugees. So we have it. Most nations will root for Israel out of self-interest, and pretend there is no need to take refugees.

    • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right. Insane. Even if they remove Gaza and all the people there from the face of this earth, all they will have accomplished is decades more coming back at them. The people of Israel are less safe than ever. Hamas did the same to their people as clearly they too are all less safe. When will this madness stop? This is disgusting and a worrying sign as we enter the AI age, that humanity just has not grown the fuck up.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    All in the name of defense of course. With the worlds most moral army, backed by the world’s biggest blank cheque, how could this be anything but self defense. Oh and fuck those journalists and their families.

  • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Two years from now there will be no Palestinians in Gaza or the West Bank and the world won’t do shit about it

  • TylerDurdenJunior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    A few hundred from the total amount of dead civilians in Ukraine.

    But Russian killing bad, Israeli killing good apparently.

    Fuck this empire

    • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t understand why this is controversial. I’m not pro-palestine by any definition - nor anti, but I am very much opposed to one-sided conquests.

      • DarkroomDoc@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hamas has Jewish eradication as part of its founding charter. I’m not sure this qualifies a one sided fight.

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          But checking the numbers of civilian deaths and injured count on both sides, even before the 7th of October paints a slightly different picture, don’t you think?

          155K injured Palestinians vs 6K Israelis. https://www.ochaopt.org/data/casualties

          26 times more injured, don’t you think that’s a bit extreme?

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you think terrorist means attacking civilians? Usually terrorism had the purpose of inciting fear on the larger side in an asymmetric conflict. Israel seems to be doing this moreso to get rid of the population, or at least to get at Hamas with absurdly low regard for civilians. Rather than making the population fearful.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think your comment is a great example of how wording matters. The use of “people” is vague enough to mean all jews or the Isreali government. One context makes your comment antisemitic while the other doesn’t. I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and only point out that the distinction is necessary because the Isreali government does not represent all jews. The government is hypocritical and you can find jews, even in Isreal, being critical of that hypocrisy.

    • kool_newt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I have particular contempt for oppressed peoples that go on to oppress others when given the chance.

  • shatal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Israel announced right at the start that its target is to eliminate Hamas and PIJ.

    Since there are:

    1. About 30,000-40,000 Hamas members in the Al-Qassam Brigades and
    2. About 6,000 members in the PIJ and
    3. Assuming 1 civilian casualty per 3 combative casualties

    Then unless something substantial changes, the death toll is expected to rise to around 50k-60k . This is really just the beginning.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken was heading to the region for talks Friday in Israel and Jordan, after President Joe Biden suggested a humanitarian “pause” in the Gaza fighting to let in aid for Palestinians and let out more foreign nationals.

    Roughly 800 people — including hundreds of Palestinians with foreign passports and dozens of wounded — have been allowed to leave Gaza over the past two days, under an apparent agreement among the U.S., Egypt, Israel and Qatar, which mediates with Hamas.

    But the Biden administration has pushed for Israel to let more aid into Gaza amid growing alarm in the region over the destruction and humanitarian crisis in the tiny Mediterranean enclave.

    More than 3,700 Palestinian children have been killed in 25 days of fighting, and three weeks of bombings that often level large swaths of neighborhoods have driven more than half the territory’s 2.3 million people from their homes.

    A senior Hamas official, Ghazi Hamad, dismissed Blinken’s visit, saying the U.S. aims “to give more cover for the vicious assault on Gaza” and “impose its own political solutions.”

    The Israeli military’s chief of staff, Herzi Halevy, said his forces were encircling Gaza City from several directions and “fighting in a built-up, dense, complex area.”


    The original article contains 1,332 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!