• dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The question is answered in the first three words. “I’m a Republican” = YTA.

    The democrats are not to blame. They have been consistent throughout. They didn’t want McCarthy back in January and they didn’t want him three weeks ago. The GOP filed the motion to vacate, forcing the democrats to answer honestly: Nope, We Still Don’t Want Him. At any time it would have taken about five republicans, fewer than half the number of republicans (and only republicans) that held the chamber hostage for three weeks, to cross the aisle and elect Hakeem Jeffries. If anyone thinks the D bear responsibility, they must admit the GOP bears tenfold.

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are a few moderate Republicans and yes they could have gone across the aisle, but they would never let Jeffries become Speaker. That was never an option on the table and it would have created a very dysfunctional House. After all, Committees would still be run by the Majority and it just wouldn’t be possible to run the House that way. Too many logistical challenges and broken norms to make it work. What they would have done had moderate Republicans reached across the aisle is to elect a Republican speaker with several concessions that would ensure Democratic legislation could stand a chance of getting out of Committee and onto the Floor for a vote. That price was apparently too high as well, since 100% of Republicans voted for Mike Johnson.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blaming Democrats is outright idiotic. Republicans have a majority, and offer no compromise for Democrats to vote for.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it doesn’t matter. Most of their base does the exact same thing. As long as those people get confirmation of what they want to believe, that is all that matters.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    YTA. It is just unreasonable to expect a party to vote for the opposing party’s Speaker, and if a Speaker can’t get enough votes to save themselves, they aren’t about to lead an effective coalition.

    The option was already dysfunction vs a different kind of dysfunction because of the Republicans who turned against their own Speaker. They would either get a Speaker they approved of or they would bring the House to a standstill. They had already taken to blocking all House business under McCarthy. You just have to blame the dysfunction on them.

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What has the Republican Party ever done for you to earn your vote?

  • scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could have stopped at “AITA: I’m a Republican…” and the answer would be the same.

    Yes.

  • InfiniteLoop@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t the dems fault, and I don’t think this would have worked (the republicans probably would have chickened out), but in a dream scenario where politics wasn’t politics, I would have liked to see a coalition of both sides come together to elect someone like Emmer (hopefully I got that name right). He was the best solution the dems were ever gonna get, and personally I would have had a lot of respect for dems swallowing their pride and voting for him to keep the far right from taking control.

    Of course, it’s all moot as long as the house keeps that awful single person can vote to vacate rule on the books. The far right would have just taken turns with movements to vacate and create a different flavor of turmoil.

    All that said, it’s not the dems fault we are here - it’s the fault of the freedom caucus, the party that let those people become candidates, AND the people that voted for them.

  • MilkToastGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The concept behind AITA is that even though a title can lead people in one direction the explainition may take you in another. All the people who didn’t read the article and instead made snap judges based off a title… YTA

    Or rather a EHS

    Don’t you all see how the current reflection of governance is not aligned with the views of the people? Your news pits you all against each other with fear factors. I don’t agree with views of Republicans but freedom caucus and my neighbor Bob have different agendas. One is being told someone is trying to destroy them and the other one is on tv telling them that. It’s easy to fall in with views your comfortable with and stay there long after they get out of hand. Education takes time

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ehh, the article is good, but people get the theme it’s going for already.

        Blaming the person who is reasonable for not covering for the unreasonable person does not make the reasonable person responsible when shit blows up.

        The GOP is playing at “if you just gave me what i wanted, I would stop hitting them” and trying to say that it’s the “not hitting peoples” fault for not giving in.

        Folk aint buying it.

      • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read the last 10% because the first 90% was explaining how the AITA subreddit works. Worthless article IMO.

        Also, Democrats NTA. McCarthy was a goon and everybody knew it. That picture of him shaking Cheeto’s hand in the days following 1/6 was all anybody needed to see to know this.

        • Melllvar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s not really what they’re saying. Instead, they’re saying that it’s obvious which commenters only read the headline.

          • moody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is due to the headline being phrased in the same way as the commonly used Reddit theme of AITA. It makes it seem as if the OP is asking the question, rather than it being the headline of an editorial.

                • MilkToastGhost@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The concept behind am I the asshole is that even though a title can lead people in one direction the explainition may take you in another. All the people who didn’t read the article and instead made snap judges based off a title… YTA

  • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really interesting to spend 2/3 the article framing the discussion. I totally think it works, but I was surprised how much time we devoted to tardiness and speeding tickets.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be more convinced if it wasn’t the 4th time they were going to lose their license. Also, they agreed to stop speeding if he cooked dinner more but that was a lie and immediately started again but expected him to keep cooking. Also …