• @towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    708 months ago

    I guess this is approaching the “find out” phase.
    VW/Audi group fucked around with emission tests, and they found out.

    • @Stillhart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      248 months ago

      They found out what? Their business wasn’t affected at all as far as I can tell. They should have been broken up and shut down but instead they got caught doing the same thing AGAIN.

      So yeah, not sure what Tesla is going to find out other than “money means you can get away with anything”, which Musk already knows well.

      And just to be clear, I own a Tesla. I just got it back from the shop after ELEVEN MONTHS because those fucking tools would rather sell more cars on false promises than divert some parts to repair the cars they’ve already sold. I love that car but I’m selling it. Nobody should go anywhere near Tesla cars until they get their supply chain shit together.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Did they loan you another car during that time, or were you stuck paying on a car you couldn’t use for 11 months? I’d consider suing if it was the latter.

        • @Stillhart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          118 months ago

          It was absolutely the latter. And I absolutely would sue if I didn’t have serious health issues (hello, cancer!) to deal with instead. It takes a lot of time and effort to deal with something like that, and that’s just not in the cards right now.

      • Turun
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        A lot of businesses get away with shit, but the emissions scandal did lead to some big fines and criminal investigations into the upper most management level.

    • @agegamon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      Honestly the range isn’t even an issue. Yes they did something wrong, but IMO in terms of misleading customers it’s not at the top of the list long list. They have all this horseshit about “full self driving” that they stick all over their website with pretty animations and graphics.

      Then you actually read into it and the fine text says “oh by the way, it’s technically just a slightly suicidal/homicidal level 2 ADAS that nobody has signed off on, and that Tesla can yank it out from under you at any time, and thst WILL be conveniently forgotten about and valued at $0 if you decide to trade in your car with tesla, but it’s cool brosky just do it for the likes”

      • @lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        A lot of the venture capitalist driven industry has been fueled by an ask for forgiveness not permission move fast and break thing philosophy tesla included. It’s about time the law start catching up with them instead of caving to their will because its a TOTALLY NEW idea because an app is involved.

        • @david@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          Exactly. Unfortunately “move fast and break things” has some disadvantages when it comes to driving in traffic.

  • Storksforlegs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    628 months ago

    “If you tell our customers we misled them, that would be bad for our business!”

  • mayooooo
    link
    fedilink
    438 months ago

    He warns? Does he now? I know that bashing journalists is a rightwing ting, but these dudes are really complicit in all of this shit. How the hell do you come up with that kind of headline? He warns

  • frog 🐸
    link
    fedilink
    English
    428 months ago

    So, basically… “an investigation into whether we lied to customers in order to sell them stuff would have an impact on our business”. Well, yeah, that’s true. Shockingly, customers don’t like being lied to about the quality of the goods they’re buying, and hearing that there’s enough indication of lying to warrant a full probe into it would make future customers hesitant to buy. While wrongdoing hasn’t been proven yet, I can’t imagine this probe would be happening “just in case” Tesla lied - there must have been a high volume of complaints from customers who aren’t happy. The precedent set by not investigating would be awful. It’d basically say businesses can claim whatever they like about their products, because being caught lying about them would always have the consequence of “material adverse impact on our business”.

    • @UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Are you seriously suggesting that a company (tesla) that does 50 billion in sales is NOT worth three times the value a company that does 250 billion (toyota)?

      The Tesla valuation is such a fucking joke. They are a “bigger” company that Toyota, Honda, or Ford despite not even doing a fraction of their outright sales, and likely making less on every single one of those sales. Their only advantage is that they were making electric cars before it made economic sense to make them. Now that everyone else is jumping in they are going to die on the vine because people can get a real EV that costs half of a Tesla and actually works.

      Tesla DID have a chance of leveraging their early market presence by either introducing a higher quality or cheaper vehicle that could compete with their new competitors. Their existing presence could have captured enough of the market to stand against them if they had a product that was in the same league. Instead they made the fucking Cybertruck.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      So the purpose of a federal investigation is to ensure the thing being investigated is shut down by the investigation?

      • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        If the offense is found to violate federal law, there should indeed be consequences. Hence the investigation part — to determine the extent.

        That’s how enforcing law works.

  • Michelle Hughes
    link
    fedilink
    318 months ago

    @Five

    “Well hey, now, let’s not get hasty. If you investigate me for crimes, you will find that I committed crimes! That would be bad for mee. Is that really what you want?”

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    248 months ago

    then maybe you shouldn’t have lied to your customers about your cars

  • Schroedinger
    link
    fedilink
    118 months ago

    @Five Oh good.

    What he means is that being found out for lying will impact how much people believe him.

    Well no shit Sherlock.