On the side bar it lists the following:

  • [Matrix/Element]Dead
  • Discord

“Discord” is an active link, but the Matrix link is completely inactive. Not only is it inactive (which could have be excused as a broken link), but it is also manually labeled as “Dead”, as if there is no intention of making it work. How can a community that is focused on privacy willingly favor a service that is privacy non-respecting when a perfectly functional privacy-respecting alternative exists?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the timeless debate between accessibility and exclusivity. Do you want more people in your community by compromising some values? Or would you rather be a hardliner but never reach those people?

    Most of the time you have to pick somewhere on that spectrum. It’s a question of pragmatism and utilitarianism.

    Does it do more good for lots of people to be slightly more privacy-aware, or is it better to have a very small portion of the population that are super privacy-aware?

    You have to decide, and the debate rages on all the time.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, really? So you think Matrix is the ultimate form of secure and private “chat” communities? Because if it is not then it is a compromise.

        This Lemmy instance for sure as hell is not the most private and secure.

          • NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree with you. I don’t understand why people are arguing that something less developed or stable is a valid reason to use something like discord, a widely anti privacy focused platform; to discuss privacy related topics.

            You can argue that it’s more stable but the cost is shepherding users into a platform they might think is secure by promoting it. In my opinion that’s worse because it lulls uneducated users into a false sense of security by having the community use and engage with each other there. The implication alone might cause some people not to second guess it since it’s supported by the community and that’s a problem for me personally.

          • thanksforallthefish
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That depends on your threat model. All lemmy posts are publicly visible and can be scooped up by Farcebook, google et al. Discord is very definitely not properly private but all posts aren’t public. They are undoubtedly doing the same thing FB does and selling a semi anonymised set of meta data about you, but the world doesn’t have direct visibility

            I know the three letter acronyms have access to everything I do, hidden or not, I don’t like it but I don’t see anyway around it.

            I can however do my level best to keep FB, google, M$ out of my stuff to some extent

          • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Never used it but I can imagine it being better. Discord is annoying as hell. Point was that the commenter seemed to argue that you should not accept any compromises, which seems silly to me.

            • I dunno. The comment doesn’t have the word in it now; that’s why #1981 is important. But, maybe they didn’t and I imagined it.

              It remains true that not all compromises are equal, and the privacy compromises we make for Discord are relatively large compared to the ones for Matrix.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                There is an “edited” indicator for posts, and the post you’re referring to doesn’t have it.

                Sure, your point is true, but you were (incorrectly) accusing the other commenter of skipping a qualifier that would make your point relevant.

                • You’re right; Voyager doesn’t show the “edited” flag.

                  I was mistaken about the word, and the accusation about skipping over it was unwarrented.

                  I think this is missing the point by arguing semantics, but my phrasing was wrong.

      • RQG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not compromising at all would be not using the internet though. Probably live in a cottage somewhere in the middle of nowhere too.

      • RovingFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people that need a topic to be promoted are the people outside of the topic. A place where privacy and non privacy focused individuals can meet is needed to atract and teach new users.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We all compromise somewhere, it’s just a question of where the line is. Even Richard Stallman makes concessions for things like Firmware and hardware being closed source.

    • Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a nicely bridget matrix - discord channel, so that the individuals of the community can choose themselves

    • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you able to at least bridge you matrix to the discord? You should, at the very least, be able to do that while also promoting matrix.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to adoption, it takes time for the usability to catch up.

      Right now Signal is just as good (IMO better) as Messenger usability wise, but that wasn’t always there.

      Matrix needs some time to iron out those issues

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree to an extent, but usability is not a sufficient condition for mass adoption. I think Lemmy for end users is just as usable as Reddit was, at least for me it is. But people don’t want to leave their communities.

        That’s why personally I have a Discord still. There are too many communities I am an active part of on there to abandon Discord outright. Plus all of my friends and family are on there, and I’ve already approached some them about switching and they all have said the same thing I just did.

        I wasn’t ever super invested in Reddit, so it was easy for me to abandon it for Lemmy, and I vastly prefer the communities here. Discord though is a different story for now, unfortunately.

      • TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this more accessible? Have you read the installation instructions? How would someone that has no IT background even manage to configure this? Even just grabbing a binary from the releases page is complicated for a lot of people.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue becomes moderation at that point, not a big problem for a larger community, but small communities tend to struggle with moderation with just one hub of communications.

        Also, the hardliners wouldn’t be interested in co-existing, that’s against their ethics generally.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You also split your intended audience and every discussion. It’s one of the big issues with Lemmy and federation right now. People create multiple copies of the same community across different servers.

  • gasull@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most cryptocurrency communities use Discord or Telegram. It’s such an embarrasment.

    • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood this either, given the whole notion and enthusiasm behind decentralization. I get the trade-offs regarding privacy, security, and convenience, but if you’re really tryna start a movement, and you really believe in the concept and principles of something like cryptocurrency, it seems like your communities and communication channels should also reflect similar values.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Crypto enthusiasts don’t really care or understand decentralization. If you talk to crypto bros you will realize pretty quickly that a lot of them are very very low IQ morons.

        I was at an event and met a crypto bro. He tried to explain to a group of us that btc is like moss and the world is the forest. A couple people legitimately “got it” and began to get excited about crypto.

        • corvus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Crypto enthusiasts don’t really care or understand decentralization.

          I wouldn’t criticize others for their low IQ while making such a dumb generalization.

      • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that’s where you realize that them defending decentralization is just trying to have a nice-sounding argument instead of assuming their dreams of getting rich with new tech

      • HardenedSteel@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you don’t trade off your security, instead you increase it.

        for Bitcoin you can increase your privacy with various tools like coinjoin and lightning network with convenience tradeoff

        or you just use Monero.

        If you have questions feel free to ask in Monero@monero.town

    • HardenedSteel@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should check privacy coin Monero.

      Matrix and XMPP is pretty much popular in XMR community

      And often discord and telegram channels are bridged with other platforms.

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh I hate communities that use Telegram. I mean, sure, I guess there’s better privacy, but Telegram was just not built for that. Messages always get lost, and there are no channels, which means no info channel, so they have to try and cram everything into the description.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should be telling the only two services they use is one infamous for fuck tons of child grooming and one infamous for fuck tons of terrorism.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why it’s so popular… It’s a fancy IRC that’s centralized by a single company

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it has significantly more features than IRC and it’s dead simple to spin up your own “server” where you aren’t beholden much to “admins” or whatever.

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        fancy IRC

        IRC was already “caveman playing with sticks and pebbles” a decade before discord became a thing. It’s really not a good point of comparison and questioning.

        Discord became popular for one simple reason: anyone could make a server, share it with a crossplatform link, and others could then try out that link without installing anything. In other words, it became popular because it literally copied Slack and because the Skype era was atrociously bad customization and ease of use-wise compared to the preceding.

      • folkrav@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every time I see Slack/Discord et Al. described as such, I wonder if any of these people actually used any of those. By use, I mean actually try out its features, not just treating it as IRC (“just” channels, messages and DMs for text convos).

        I hate Discord with a passion, but pretending like it’s just “fancy IRC” is IMHO pretty absurd.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you legitimately don’t understand why it’s popular, you are seriously out of touch.

      • rbits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Better moderation tools
        • Easier to do voice/video channels
        • Easy to create your own server
        • Huge amount of useful bots created by the community
        • Features like replies, threads, onboarding screens, and custom emotes

        Don’t get me wrong, I wish that we could use a FOSS platform instead of Discord, but 1: people are already using Discord and it’s hard to get everyone to switch platform, and 2: there is no comparable alternative right now

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use it because some of my favorite games for the Nintendo DS that has Wiimmfi support use it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        Too hard to regrow the, already tiny user base in those cases.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, seems like it is only for MK for Wii, as it shows in the always decent active users count, but it supports many games, and I use it mainly for Metroid Prime Hunters and Jump Ultimate Stars.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s encrypted between you and discord. So somebody on your Wi-Fi can’t see what you’re typing. But it’s not encrypted end to end. Discord can see everything that people talk about. And that’s the problem

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Secure socket layer is a type of encryption. So discord can correctly claim it is encrypted. And the commenter above can get confused by that. Confusing user to server encryption and end-to-end encryption where the messages are encrypted between users is important distinction.

              • Liforra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah ur right, it is encryption, barely, but it is “military grade encryption”

              • library_napper@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ceaser cipher is a type of encrypton. That doesn’t make it safe. Nor is TLS with a terribly broken PKI.

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used the Discord bridge before; it works pretty well, and allows Matrix users to practice better (identity & tracking) privacy if they want. There is none, in Discord.

    It does require (a) the Discord community admin to allow the bridge, and (b) some playing with configuration of the bridge to get banning working.

    The biggest issue with Matrix is how privacy-respecting it is. Any public forum with anonymous account creation is subject to spam bots, and requires more work by admins. The biggest complaint about the bridge, and why so many Discord admins do not allow it, is because it greatly increases the spam they have to deal with. Kicking and blocking do work fine through the bridge, but it’s still a distraction requiring constant vigilance.

    Matrix needs better admin tools (where have we heard that before?) Mjolnir is good, but the freely hosted instance was shut down a year or so ago, so it’s not available to casual users. And taking on running a service just for a community bridge is a silly requirement.

    My points are, that it’s not an either-or, but that it requires work. It’s a question of commitment, not possibility. c/privacy could have a Matrix-first, privacy-friendly approach and still offer Discord for privacy casuals; it’s just harder.

  • Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who dislike discord and want a good alternative besides matrix should check out revolt.chat <3

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tencent is not a data collection company. Discord is not owned by tencent instead tencent and tons of other companies have invested in discord. https://businessmodelanalyst.com/who-owns-discord/

      Tencent itself doesn’t get discords data. Tencent is not required by law to pass all user information to CCP.

      Discord like any communication systems is required to pass data to all major governments when they are investigating crime. Such as the USA and FBI. Your lemmy instance does the same thing.

      Please state facts rather than misinformation. If you are going to pass off these facts provide sources.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty much all companies are data collection companies, or they have data collection services tacked onto their software. However, in this case, Tencent is a company in China, and China is a data collection country.

        Tencent is not required by law to pass all user information to CCP.

        If China wants to see it, then yes they are required by law to pass information to the CCP.

        • MJBrune@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          China is a data collection country.

          Cause the USA isn’t?

          If China wants to see it, then yes they are required by law to pass information to the CCP.

          You should look up the PRISM program.

          If you are going to label Tencent as purely a data collection company belonging to a data collection country then let me remind you that Linux had a social media site that collected a lot of information that could have been turned over to the US federal law enforcement due to prism and the US laws SCA and CLOUD acts.

          So literally if that’s your definition, the Linux Foundation is a data collection company too.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not athletic enough to keep up with your logical leaps.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your only source is to counter a claim I didn’t make. I’m not going to do your homework. If you’re worried about privacy, don’t use Discord. That’s the short version.

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Citing sources is the task of the one putting the argument on the table in the first place

          -My kitchen is made out of uranium
          -That’s not true
          -Do you have a source to back this up?
          Doesnt work

        • MJBrune@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A majority stake of Discord is owned by Tencent

          You said this. My source proves this wrong.

          You are spreading misinformation. I am not going to do your homework to prove your claims.

    • Zastyion345@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This, discord saying no to Microsoft’s offer to buy them out few years back shows they know what they got.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because conversations about increasing privacy doesn’t need to be private. It’s usually about learning about other tools and that they exist.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This only makes sense if discord is a common entry point into the community which seems unlikely to me

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It probably isn’t, but it’s probably a good place to get a quick answer about something.

        • DefinitelyNotAPenguin@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Again, I just don’t understand what you mean by this, there’s a list of servers, you click one and get a list of channels in that server, click one of those and you’ve got a classic chatroom.

          What is it you find chaotic?

          • berg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            When I started out with discord I felt like such a boomer. Four years in it’s a breeze, until I made my own server, then it was a few weeks back with the boomer feel.

            If you’re coming from mumble/ventrilo or such, there’s quite a bit to learn imo. Especially if you never used skype or the like, and were used to IRC. Or I’m just a boomer…

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              IRC-dwelling Gen Z here. Discord is an abomination. Not to mention that it’s apparently not very friendly to third-party clients, while the official one as well as browser version is very heavy. Like, “a third of what my whole OS consumes” heavy.

              Left Discord a while ago, no regrets.

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Funny, I feel the same way about Matrix clients, instead. They’re not that bad, but they could use quite a bit of polish (and they also don’t rake in millions a year, so it’s not an exactly fair comparison).
      I guess it just comes down to what you’re used to

  • ngn@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “discussing privacy on discord” that should be a joke anyways i created privacy@conference.jabbers.one so join if you want

  • azenyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because privacy and convenience are two extreme opposites and you can only go so far in the privacy direction before you start losing everything. Discord just works a million times better as a public forum/community than Matrix and is much more easily accessible to everyone.

    There is a limit. I am privacy conscious but I still use all Google Services for example, because they actually provide me with a better web, work, mobile and entertainment experiences. Similarly, I prefer Discord for big communities with channels, server bots and topics, over Matrix.

    Edit: all those people saying we can’t be privacy conscious and use Google Services at the same time: yes you can. Their services literally make my life better so I will keep using them, but I keep what I share with them to the absolute minimum. I go into their settings and disable everything I can about tracking and ads personalization (even if they still track me, I do my best not to be). You can surely still be privacy conscious using non-private products. Being extremist is not how you convince average joes to think about privacy, nor by telling them to give up all they use for unknown (for them) alternatives.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix is pretty convenient. They’ve got a great mobile and web app experience.

      What exactly does discord have that mateix doesn’t? They both have threading, replies, reacts, etc.

        • Ferk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But that’s cyclic reasoning. Nothing that you need/want will be on matrix if you (and everyone else) does not think it’s worth to make what you need/want be in matrix…

          I don’t need EVERYTHING to be in Matrix, just the things I’m interested in. So I’m happy when I see a push to have those specific things there. This is the same argument as to why I don’t use Reddit anymore, despite Lemmy/Kbin having only a fraction of the content.

          It also helps the fact that Matrix is very flexible when it comes to mirroring/proxying other protocols. I can easily access IRC communities from Matrix, for example. The integration in that direction is nicer than requiring discord channels to add bots that parrot an IRC chat.

            • Ferk@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, but the question is: what does matrix need to establish itself as a solid alternative?

              You can’t answer that by saying “people don’t use it, change that” because that’s something only people can change, not matrix, that’d lead to a cyclic problem.

              Specially when that’s given as a counterpoint to justify not wanting to do the change for “this community”. It’s contradictory to want its popularity to be changed but accept the lack of change alone as a valid reason to justify your communities not changing.

                • Ferk@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think EVERYONE needs to understand / know about it. I mean, I remember when I was young most people had no idea how to use the internet (hell, they didn’t even know how to program a VHS), yet I was perfectly happy using that technology.

                  I only need a specific set of people and specific communities to be there for it to be worth it. Like I said: I no longer use reddit, even though the fediverse has only a small fraction of the content existing in reddit… I would have expected people in the fediverse would be more receptive to unpopular but technologically/ethically superior alternatives.

        • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How and who is addressing this at large scale? I mean uptake of foss vs proprietary, privacy compliant vs not etc… It’s the same story for signal vs WhatsApp, when one sees the majority of relatives using WhatsApp, s/he would then drop signal altogether or keep it alongside for the one geek that uses it. I am in this situation and it defeats me that not much people care and chose convenience over concerns that I find legitimately vital, or in any case not trivial. I quit using Facebook/Instagram 2 years ago seeing what it does to society and am better off mentally, but the interactions I have through mastodon and pixelfed are zero, although my meta pages are still up with these links

            • jackalope@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Each matrix chat is it’s own channel. To admin multiple channels as you would on discord you just have to set up multiple matrix chats held by a common owner.

              There is a mod role but you’re right that you can’t make custom ones though I honestly don’t see much need to for a simple privacy community.

              And I think matrix has voice now.

              But yah I get what you’re saying. Thank you for the elaboration.

    • ngn@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      i dont think anyone using google services is “privacy conscious”

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well they’re privacy “conscious” but still feel trapped. IMHO the first sentence is even more telling namely “privacy and convenience are two extreme opposites” as a justification. It’s not necessarily true, namely one can use… well pretty much anything BUT Google or Meta product and have a perfectly convenient experience. They are just used to it, so amalgamating what they are used to to what is objectively convenient for all.

        Maybe some day in the near future they will decide to go from being conscious to active about it and I can tell in advance, they are going to feel a lot better, but it requires more than introspection, it requires action.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, Google even read your mails, it’s sooo private. Its right that Google offers good services respect quality, but its a privacy nightmare and nowadays there are very good alternatives out there, even when they are also propietary. Eg, YT is maybe the best streaming platform, but full of ads, clickbaits, tracking and other crap, now even blocks videos if you use some adblockers. Because of this a lot of people translade subscriptions and playlists to Odysee, also privacy but way better respect privacy and few ads (online service of IMDB)

      Discord is certainly not the best but also not the worse (see Reddit, X, Fakebook, WhatsCrap, etc), but offers a lot of features which other platforms don’t have.

      Privacy in internet finish when you go online, the user can only patch the worst leaks more or less succesfull, beginning with the worst privacy and security hole, himself. Read the TOS and PP of an soft or service you want to use, check the sites with Blacklight, Webkoll, UrlVoid, Exodus Privacy, AV or similar, even if it is FOSS, which no neccesarly is a security or privacy feature, tracking APIs from Google, Amazon, Facebook and M$ are also FOSS and included in a lot of FOSS in this Microsoft site called GitHub.

      You don’t need a tin foil hat, but common sense in the internet.